Posted on 11/08/2010 10:32:14 AM PST by gwjack
A temporary restraining order has been issued to block a state constitutional amendment that prohibits state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases. U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange handed down the ruling this morning in Oklahoma City following a brief hearing.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsok.com ...
the law stigmatizes his religion.”
translation sharia law is my law not the constitution and I will not abide by your laws as I have mine.
THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS
DUH! Well, of course, we want to consider whether or not to stone someone to death for adultery, or to chop off the right arm and left leg of someone who insults Mohammed. That's exactly the sort of thing the Framers had in mind when they set up our judicial branch. YEA! Bravo! Way to go, judge! You are truly a forward thinking visionary. /s
I can see the torches and pitchforks from my house.
so C AIR went judge shopping did they or they just happened to get lucky that the judge is a woman who has many muslims friends and a muslim boy boyfriend
Speaqk for yopurself. I most certainly AM trying to ban islam here. It's an evil, corrupt Judicial, Political, Militaristic codified way of life that is completely incompatible with all other ways of life. It stands in direct contravention to our Western Values and Heritage and in fact denigrates our values at every turn. islam teaches its adherants to never assimiliate. It teaches them to overthrow...by any means possible. Right now we're being assaulted by a demographic bomb...they are birth rating us into the ground. Look around the world and tell me where muslims have moved in, increased their population and coexisted peacefully with their non-muslim neighbors.
Actually, I (and a few of my friends) am considering a suit on the disenfranchisement of our votes.
“In order to issue a TRO the judge must find that it’s more likely than not the movant will prevail on the merits of the case. I’d love to see how the Judge came to that legal conclusion.”
I am curious what pressing case created the emergency necessary to have a TRO hearing.
Was there an accused murderer whose defense required claiming Sharia made him do it? Maybe a bomber?
Please keep us updated with the results of your efforts.
Thanks in advance.
Might I take this time to direct you to this previous thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2620447/posts
Reply number 19 might be of interest to you.
LOL!!!! Post of the day!
CA....
LOL!!!! Post of the day!
CA....
can this judge be removed, ignored or to take a hike?
Something needs to be done to this judge as she is clearly not doing her job as she should be./
sick to death of judges doing do their agenda.
Here in FL a homo judge says homo’s can adopt even though the law says they cannot
In CA homo judges overturn a constitutional amendment
CA again another liberal judge says get rid of don’t ask.
Now in OK this judge says you can’t ban the courts at looking at sharia law in this country
SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE TO THESE KIND OF JUDGES IT HAS GOT WAY OUT OF HAND NOW
ATTACK OF THE M&M.Mexicans and Moslums
It looks like the federal courts will side with the Islamo-fascists just like they have sided with the Mexican fascists.
ATTACK OF THE M&M.Mexicans and Moslums
It looks like the federal courts will side with the Islamo-fascists just like they have sided with the Mexican fascists.
Mr. Jazzy, thanks for writing. Yes I was aware of what I wrote before. I still have confidence in our judiciary. As I wrote in an earlier post on this thread, it is easy to win when the defendant doesn’t show up.
This is the beginning shot in a long battle. We will not consider the issue closed until an en banc panel, the Tenth Circuit, or the US Supremes rule.
I am sending you a private post that I sent to Jim Robinson earlier.
Be well, my friend.
Gwjack
This is a joke, although a very bad one.
How long until a court just invalidates an election for, say, governor and senator and hands the election to the losing candidate because a win by the one people voted for would somehow be “unconstitutional?” Sounds absolutely ridiculous to me, but a lot of the things we’re arguing with the left about these days sounded ridiculous only ten or twenty years ago.
Someone posted that as a “semi-satire” on Sunday. Not so funny now. It took what, all of ten minutes for this creature to concoct this ruling, straight from her posterior.
Little by little, judges are doing away with the ballot box. They do so at their own risk.
Someone posted that as a “semi-satire” on Sunday. Not so funny now. It took what, all of ten minutes for this creature to concoct this ruling, straight from her posterior.
Little by little, judges are doing away with the ballot box. They do so at their own risk.
But I was specifically talking about SQ-755 here in Oklahoma.
That's not what was happening though, was it?
They were banning the using of Sharia Law in the State, not Islam.
Or am I missing something?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.