Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Order Blocks Oklahoma Constitutional Amendment
newsok.com ^ | November 8, 2010 | Tim Talley

Posted on 11/08/2010 10:32:14 AM PST by gwjack

A temporary restraining order has been issued to block a state constitutional amendment that prohibits state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases. U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange handed down the ruling this morning in Oklahoma City following a brief hearing.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsok.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: 0jama2012; 10thamendment; communism; constitution; crushislam; democrats; dhimmicrats; internationallaw; islam; islamofascism; judicialtyranny; liberalfascism; mileslagrange; mosqueandstate; muslims; november2010; obama; oklahoma; sharialaw; sovereignty; statesrights; theruleoflaw; treason; tyranny; unitednations; vickimileslagrange
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-243 next last
To: circlecity
In order to issue a TRO the judge must find that it’s more likely than not the movant will prevail on the merits of the case.

Doesn't the moving party also have to prove it will suffer "irreparable harm" without the TRO?

61 posted on 11/08/2010 11:24:14 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Truth is a Weapon

“Considering CAIR said they would never ask for Sharia Law in Oklahoma, how can they be harmed by this constitutional amendment?”

Because CAIR is allowed to lie to infidels. Their long range plan is whenever the muslim population density reaches critical mass in a given geographical area, they will insist on implementing Sharia law.


62 posted on 11/08/2010 11:24:39 AM PST by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jvette

Never ever, ever, trust anyone — repeat anyone — with a hyphenated last name.


63 posted on 11/08/2010 11:25:44 AM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

Gotta check that name out...U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange...hmmm


64 posted on 11/08/2010 11:27:11 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
The liberal love for Muslims is the most horrific example of mass dementia I have ever seen. It’s a group of people literally supporting their own enslavement or death.

Absolutely right. Given demographic realities, the greatest irony of all is that the shift to Islamic will take place because while Muslims continue to have babies,= liberal women continue to abort theirs. Sharia law will be ushered in by feminists—those whose personal freedom will be most negatively impacted.

65 posted on 11/08/2010 11:28:09 AM PST by newheart (Please don't shoot at the thermonuclear weapons. --Vic Deakins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

So this judge is saying that it is okay to consider international or Islamic law when deciding cases?

Let’s get this on record!


66 posted on 11/08/2010 11:28:46 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Planning on using 911? Google "Brittany Zimmerman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Yep, just as I suspected.

We gotta a lot of work to do!


67 posted on 11/08/2010 11:28:57 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

LOL, it is a prime clue, isn’t it?


68 posted on 11/08/2010 11:32:24 AM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

This judge does not have such authority.

To allow her to have this authority would separate the governed from the government.

This is serious stuff.


69 posted on 11/08/2010 11:33:21 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
BULLS#!+!
SCREW THIS JUDGE---IMPEACH HER YESTERDAY!

I am damn sick of judges pretending THEY get to write the Constitution. Seriously. Impeach this MORON and REMOVE her from the BENCH.

And Oklahoma--you go ahead an IMPLEMENT your Constitution! Tell this black robed self-anointed LEGISLATOR to SHOVE IT.

70 posted on 11/08/2010 11:36:53 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
We need to Teanami the judiciary.

This is completely insane.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

71 posted on 11/08/2010 11:37:15 AM PST by The Comedian (I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Look Jim.....nobody is trying to ban Islam here in OK.

Where did you get that idea?

72 posted on 11/08/2010 11:43:13 AM PST by Osage Orange (The IRS thinks I'm made of money.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

I heard a news story on KTOK at the top of the hour. They reported that the primary reason that the judge issued the order was that the State Election Board did not file a brief. I have called the State Election Board, and spoken with the agency head. He initially did not answer my question of whether the reported story was true. He told me that the AG’s office represented them (I guess he thinks I am stupid). After telling him he didn’t answer my question, I asked him again if it were true, and he referred me to the AG’s office. When I asked for a specific name, he said that he didn’t know who was at court, but that Jane Pressler represented them. I have a call in to Ms. Pressler.

Oh, by the way, Paul Ziriax (the director) is a democrat appointee. The outgoing AG is a democrat.

I will talk with the incoming Ag later this week. This is now a new agenda item.

Gwjack

PS: Phone numbers available on request.


73 posted on 11/08/2010 11:48:01 AM PST by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

WHAT????????????????????

How the hell could anyone say that we should not ban sharia law in our courts even for one minute


74 posted on 11/08/2010 11:48:01 AM PST by manc (Homosexuality is a mental disorder as is liberalism. Anyone supporting this needs mental help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

So follow Limbaugh’s example and illustrate the absurdity: file an amicus brief in a death penalty using Sharia law to blunt the cries of cruel and unusual. Next challenge a liberal commentator in every discussion and ask them why the so-called “separation” clause of the First Amendment would not apply. See if they are willing to give equal weight to Canon Law of the Catholic Church.


75 posted on 11/08/2010 11:48:20 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

So do 4 Justices of the US Supreme Court. Five when O’Connor was still around. Stephen Breyer conducted a lengthy symposium on the subject that was televisesd on either CSPAN or PBS, can’t remember which but he was joined by Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruthe Bader Ginsburg. They’re serious and frankly traitorous IMHO.


76 posted on 11/08/2010 11:48:56 AM PST by pgkdan (Protect and Defend America! End the practice of islam on our shores before it's too late!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
Just goes to show our elected judges have done as much if not way more damage than this WH administaration however Obama just elected two radicals to the Supreme Court so we'll be seeing some real nasty stuff via the courts for decades to come. Shar'ia law is evil, Islam is a murderous cult, end of story.

Throw any fools that don't believe this in their own new city in any muslim oriented country or society and see what happens when they try and establish a different religion, a different way of life including atheism.

77 posted on 11/08/2010 11:49:10 AM PST by Karliner (Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jvette

let me get this right.
A judge is supposed to go by the constitution.

Now how can a judge put this order in.

The constitution is the law not sharia.

Is this judge able to be replaced by the voters like here in FL.


78 posted on 11/08/2010 11:49:59 AM PST by manc (Homosexuality is a mental disorder as is liberalism. Anyone supporting this needs mental help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

International and Sharia law dictate that this amendment is unConstitutional.

You have a nice day. :)


79 posted on 11/08/2010 11:51:08 AM PST by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

And I thought my purchases of “Obama” induced guns was at an end last week. I’ll have to go and buy another shotguan now.

Note for any lurkers: I am purchasing the guns because of Obama’s policies. Not for use except in self defense. I do still have a Second Amendment, don’t I?

Gwjack


80 posted on 11/08/2010 11:51:50 AM PST by gwjack (May God give America His richest blessings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson