Posted on 11/08/2010 10:32:14 AM PST by gwjack
A temporary restraining order has been issued to block a state constitutional amendment that prohibits state courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding cases. U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange handed down the ruling this morning in Oklahoma City following a brief hearing.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsok.com ...
Doesn't the moving party also have to prove it will suffer "irreparable harm" without the TRO?
“Considering CAIR said they would never ask for Sharia Law in Oklahoma, how can they be harmed by this constitutional amendment?”
Because CAIR is allowed to lie to infidels. Their long range plan is whenever the muslim population density reaches critical mass in a given geographical area, they will insist on implementing Sharia law.
Never ever, ever, trust anyone — repeat anyone — with a hyphenated last name.
Gotta check that name out...U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange...hmmm
Absolutely right. Given demographic realities, the greatest irony of all is that the shift to Islamic will take place because while Muslims continue to have babies,= liberal women continue to abort theirs. Sharia law will be ushered in by feministsthose whose personal freedom will be most negatively impacted.
So this judge is saying that it is okay to consider international or Islamic law when deciding cases?
Let’s get this on record!
Yep, just as I suspected.
We gotta a lot of work to do!
LOL, it is a prime clue, isn’t it?
This judge does not have such authority.
To allow her to have this authority would separate the governed from the government.
This is serious stuff.
I am damn sick of judges pretending THEY get to write the Constitution. Seriously. Impeach this MORON and REMOVE her from the BENCH.
And Oklahoma--you go ahead an IMPLEMENT your Constitution! Tell this black robed self-anointed LEGISLATOR to SHOVE IT.
This is completely insane.
Where did you get that idea?
I heard a news story on KTOK at the top of the hour. They reported that the primary reason that the judge issued the order was that the State Election Board did not file a brief. I have called the State Election Board, and spoken with the agency head. He initially did not answer my question of whether the reported story was true. He told me that the AG’s office represented them (I guess he thinks I am stupid). After telling him he didn’t answer my question, I asked him again if it were true, and he referred me to the AG’s office. When I asked for a specific name, he said that he didn’t know who was at court, but that Jane Pressler represented them. I have a call in to Ms. Pressler.
Oh, by the way, Paul Ziriax (the director) is a democrat appointee. The outgoing AG is a democrat.
I will talk with the incoming Ag later this week. This is now a new agenda item.
Gwjack
PS: Phone numbers available on request.
WHAT????????????????????
How the hell could anyone say that we should not ban sharia law in our courts even for one minute
So follow Limbaugh’s example and illustrate the absurdity: file an amicus brief in a death penalty using Sharia law to blunt the cries of cruel and unusual. Next challenge a liberal commentator in every discussion and ask them why the so-called “separation” clause of the First Amendment would not apply. See if they are willing to give equal weight to Canon Law of the Catholic Church.
So do 4 Justices of the US Supreme Court. Five when O’Connor was still around. Stephen Breyer conducted a lengthy symposium on the subject that was televisesd on either CSPAN or PBS, can’t remember which but he was joined by Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruthe Bader Ginsburg. They’re serious and frankly traitorous IMHO.
Throw any fools that don't believe this in their own new city in any muslim oriented country or society and see what happens when they try and establish a different religion, a different way of life including atheism.
let me get this right.
A judge is supposed to go by the constitution.
Now how can a judge put this order in.
The constitution is the law not sharia.
Is this judge able to be replaced by the voters like here in FL.
International and Sharia law dictate that this amendment is unConstitutional.
You have a nice day. :)
And I thought my purchases of “Obama” induced guns was at an end last week. I’ll have to go and buy another shotguan now.
Note for any lurkers: I am purchasing the guns because of Obama’s policies. Not for use except in self defense. I do still have a Second Amendment, don’t I?
Gwjack
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.