Posted on 06/29/2010 8:48:14 AM PDT by NYer
A farmer's field in Buckinghamshire has yielded a grisly secret - it was the burial ground for nearly 100 tiny babies slaughtered by the Romans.
The site is suspected of being an ancient brothel and the 97 newborns could have been the unwanted babies of prostitutes, experts say.
With little or no effective contraception available to the Romans, who also considered infanticide less shocking than it is today, they may have simply murdered the children as soon as they were born.
The Yewden Villa excavations at Hambleden in 1912. Archaelogists have found the remains of 97 babies at the site
Archaeologists believe locals may have systematically killed and buried the helpless youngsters on the site near Hambleden.
Measurements of their bones show all the babies died at around 40 weeks gestation, suggesting very soon after birth. If they had died from natural causes, they would have been different ages.
Archaeologist Dr Jill Eyers said: 'The only explanation you keep coming back to is that it's got to be a brothel.' Today, in the rolling countryside, there is nothing to suggest it was the scene of mass killings.
The Yewden villa at Hambleden was excavated 100 years ago and identified as a high status Roman villa.
One of the infant skeletons found during the dig. Scientists believe the site was used to dump the bodies of prostitutes' babies
Part of one of the baby's skulls which were found at the site
It is now covered by a wheat field, but meticulous records were left by Alfred Heneage Cocks, a naturalist and archaeologist, who reported his findings in 1921.
He gave precise locations for the infant bodies, which were hidden under walls or buried under courtyards close to each other.
However, the matter was not investigated further until now. Cocks' original report was recently rediscovered, along with 300 boxes of photographs, artefacts, pottery and bones, at Buckinghamshire County Museum.
A team plans to carry out DNA tests on the skeletons to establish how old they were and if they were related
'There is no other site that would yield anything like the 97 infant burials,' said Dr Simon Mays, a skeletal biologist at English Heritage's Centre for Archaeology.
The find has been compared to the discovery of the skeletons of 100 Roman- era babies in a sewer beneath a bath house in Ashkelon, southern Israel, in 1988.
Invaders' hidden culture of death and debauchery
Nearly 2,000 years ago it was the Romans who were enjoying the pleasant climate and farming bountiful crops in this corner of south east England.
The nearest Roman town was St Albans, or Verulamium, a busy market on Watling Street with its own gladiator theatre.
Life was tough, disease rife and hygiene for the poor dreadful, but the climate is thought to have been warmer than now, making farming easier.
Ruling with an iron fist: A typical Roman soldier
The Roman name for Hambleden is lost to antiquity but the people would have been a mixture of native Celts and Roman settlers, most of them farmers growing wheat and barley and a mixture of other crops.
Living in houses made mostly of wood, some would have travelled the length of the empire in the army and settled in the fertile Thames Valley, but most would never have travelled any distance from home.
Despite the bloody image of the Roman Empire, Britain was - especially in the south - a peaceful and prosperous place for most of the period of the occupation.
Pottery found in Hambleden comes from modern- day Italy, France, Belgium and Germany, showing the trade which the Empire brought.
But it also brought a culture of debauchery and death - even to a tiny village near the Thames, or 'Tamesis' to the Romans - with gladiators a day's boat trip away in London ( Londinium), brothels, and unwanted babies left to die in the open.
The famously well-preserved remains at Pompeii revealed a city rife with brothels signposted with erotic frescoes tempting passers-by with phrases such as 'Hic habitat felicitas' (Here happiness resides) or 'Sum tua aere' (I am yours for money).
Unlikely as it seems, it is entirely possible that Hambleden could have supported a brothel, as it is so close to the Thames, a busy waterway bringing trade to and from London.
The two-storey building was a few hundred yards from the river, with plenty of signs of wealth in the coins and pottery found in the grounds. The remains of writing tablets and stylae, used to write, were also found, telling of a place with extensive contact with the wider world.
Dr Simon Mays, a skeletal biologist at English Heritage, has examined the Hambleden Roman infant bones
Literacy was a sign of affluence, and rich men and women were in frequent correspondence with each other.
Correspondence found at Hadrian's Wall shows how they bickered over dinner parties, gossiped about friends and discussed fashion in notes to each other.
What went on inside the Hambleden villa is, of course, a matter of conjecture. But there is little doubt that the find of so many babies' skeletons proves that Roman Britain shared another part of the empire's culture - infanticide.
John Hannah in the new TV series Spartacus: Blood And Sand. Spartacus led a slave uprising against the Roman rule
Illegal today, it was the opposite for the Romans, with the law making a child under two entirely the property of its father, to be disposed of as he saw fit - and if it was deformed, it was compulsory to put it to death. A letter from a Roman citizen to his wife, dating from 1BC, demonstrates the casual nature with which infanticide was often viewed:
'I am still in Alexandria. ... I beg and plead with you to take care of our little child, and as soon as we receive wages, I will send them to you. In the meantime, if (good fortune to you!) you give birth, if it is a boy, let it live; if it is a girl, expose it.'
In 374 - after Constantine made Christianity the official religion of the empire - the practice was banned. The Romans may have done much for us - but they left a very dark secret in the Home Counties.
bump
If the Emperor Claudius hadn't gotten the notion to conquer Britain, they could have been living a happy life...and not paying any taxes to Caesar.
From the article: “Measurements of their bones show all the babies died at around 40 weeks gestation, suggesting very soon after birth. If they had died from natural causes, they would have been different ages.”
I was 9 lb 10 oz. My first born was 5 lb. 5 oz...We were both full term.
That is why islamic families are outnumbering westerners eight to one. No punative divorce laws in sharia law; the very same ones that make a western man think twice about marrying and pro-creating.
Until the family court laws in the western world wake up and smell the failed “pro feminazi” agenda of the past 40 years (aka woman=good man=bad) we will all be on our prayer mats facing east. Then where will N.O.W. be?????!!
There was little knowledge of the birth process and no pre-natal care in those days so I imagine if anything went wrong the baby didn’t make it and the rate of deaths at or near birth was likely quite high. I wonder why those studying this find are so sure the infants were murdered? The scenerio of this being a brothel with babies murdered is possible but they may be jumping to that conclusion.
They will be either DEAD or working in one of the “unofficial” official state brothels...Like someone once told me the only thing worse than WAR is LOSING a War....
What have you read from modern liberals that shows they have selectively ignored that fact?
Take this website for instance:
http://www.britainexpress.com/History/Celtic_Britain.htm
It completely glosses over their culture of human sacrifice and dismisses it as basically roman propaganda, despite archeological evidence such as the Lindow Bog Man and the discover of a mass grave of headless skeletons in Alveston, amongst other things, supporting Roman sources...
As the story notes:
Measurements of their bones show all the babies died at around 40 weeks gestation, suggesting very soon after birth. If they had died from natural causes, they would have been different ages.
An archeologist/linguist professor friend of mine, asserts that virtually all pagan civilizations practiced some form of infanticide and/or religious human sacrifice.
In spite of PC claims to the contrary, life really was a lot more nasty before Judaism & Christianity came into the world...
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks NYer. Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · Archaeology · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
The Romans also practiced human sacrificed in their Monarchical and early Republican days, but they had outgrown it by the time they invaded Britain under Claudius....
I read that, but if they were stillborn, or had major birth defects they still would have died at about 40 weeks- ahhh.. who knows.
|
|
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution. |
|
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.