Skip to comments.Matthews Challenges 2nd Amendment Advocate Over…Bazookas?
Posted on 04/20/2010 8:32:52 AM PDT by Biggirl
Oh brother, I hate it when 2nd amendment arguments descend to this level. Chris Matthews has a Second Amendment activist on his show clearly with the intent of turning him into a kook.
(Excerpt) Read more at radioviceonline.com ...
Why don’t these guys come prepared with the standard response.
What is implied by ‘Letters of Marque and Reprisal’
You wouldn’t even get to the implications, because the interviewer would say ‘I don’t know what that means’ and the advocate can simply reply, than you clearly don;t know what you are talking about...
I had a local newspaper columnist bring up cruise missiles as his argument against the 2nd Amendment. I quit visiting his blog after that one.
Gotta give Chrissie a little credit on this for not immediately jumping to that level... /s
Sigh. Stuck in traffic. Someone jumps your parking space. Where’s a good, light anti-armor weapon when you really need one?
There is a difference in 1700 / 1800 lexicon between “arms” and “ordnance”.
I’ve had a nuke submarine in the bottom of my swimming pool for years /sarc
Well some INTERESTING stuff from Mr. Tingley Legs! THANKS Jim!”
Chris Matthews; Is that a bazooka in your pocket, or have you been watching Zero reruns on Speeches of Hope? What a nitwit.
Don’t need bazookas anyway. Did Chris forget yesterday’s anniversary? No bazookas there.
Doesn’t it simplify as projectile versus EXPLOSIVE shell?
I watched this “interview” (yeah, sometimes I force my self to view the vomit from the left). Chrissy Matthews needed to have his mic shoved down his throat he was so obnoxious. There was only one intent in his little pea brain - to set up the two men being “interviewed” such that they looked like kooks. Unfortunately for Chrissy, the two men were too intelligent to fall for Chrissy’s BS.
Pissy Chrissy is all wee wee’d up again! You’d need to put some duct tape over that big mouth to ever have a fair debate with him.
Camp in that or what? I bet you don’t have to haggle over a site. Nobody wants a sidwinder in their slideout.
A Lincoln Navigator driving on Highway 50 this morning during a heavy downpour was passing vehicles when the Navigator began to hydroplane. Now, that’s when a light anti-tank weapon would be useful.
I have to plead ignorance. Can you give a short explanation for the role that Letters of Marque and Reprisal would play in a 2nd Amendment debate? Thanks.
Portable tactical suitcase nukes don’t kill people,
People kill people! /sarc
>Can you give a short explanation for the role that Letters of Marque and Reprisal would play in a 2nd Amendment debate?
A letter of marque and Reprisal is government authorization targeting [marking] an individual or group for punishment [reprisal]; similar, in concept, to a “Wanted” poster.
One option after 11 Sep was to use such letters against al Queda / Taliban; Ron Paul suggested that it would be more affordable than a war/military-operation.
Just a little nudge gets the job done, eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.