Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

13 STATES FILE LAWSUIT AGAINST HEALTH CARE BILL
Associated Press ^ | March 23, 2010

Posted on 03/23/2010 10:14:19 AM PDT by MrChips

Edited on 03/23/2010 10:22:28 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Attorneys general from 13 states sued the federal government Tuesday, claiming the landmark health care overhaul bill is unconstitutional just seven minutes after President Barack Obama signed it into law.

The lawsuit was filed in Pensacola after the Democratic president signed the bill the House passed Sunday night.


(Excerpt) Read more at aolnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; ag; bhofascism; bhohealthcare; bhotyranny; democrats; donttreadonme; health; lawsuit; libertyordeath; military; obama; obamacare; statesrights; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-337 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator

To: mel

I *think* that SCOTUS can take a case at any time, but only if they want to. A case can’t be brought to them directly.

Not sure how it works exactly, but in 2000 they grabbed the Florida Gore election case, didn’t take 2 years to get there.


222 posted on 03/23/2010 3:00:50 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

This lawsuit is perhaps the only peaceful way to get rid of this commie care caca. I’m not lying when I say I am willing to die to keep from participating in their system.


223 posted on 03/23/2010 3:04:06 PM PDT by Creek Injun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

This case is completely different from that of Social Security.

The budgetary concerns are hyperbole. An AG legal staffs will motion, respond, reply, research, communicate, coordinate, strategize and set tactics using about 4 FT attorneys and the same number of assistants and secretaries. It’s hardly a concern as these are government attorneys who are on salary and production.

As far as ‘others’ stating slim chances for success, there are more fine legal scholars and constitutional law professors all over the internet that say there is not one part of the Constitution that would leave this bill standing.

Amnesty and Cap& Trade will further infuriate the public and bring them to the boiling point. That is not good but I personally would welcome it as it would usher in a set of real conservative reforms.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2477434/posts?page=52#52


224 posted on 03/23/2010 3:04:31 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: historyrepeatz
What about the “equal protection clause”.. Some states are getting preferential treatment over others (”sweetheart deals”), and certain exemptions in some cases.. This is clearly unconstitutional. And barring banks from issuing student loans?? How is THAT constitutional?

One bank in ND or SD [can't remember which] was exempted and CAN still write student loans ...

225 posted on 03/23/2010 3:05:06 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: my4kidsdad

I moved from Bolingbrook (SW sububs of Chicago) to Florida back in 1992. I don’t miss Illinois at all exceptr for the great Joliet American Legion Band which I was a member fo for 8 years.


226 posted on 03/23/2010 3:05:41 PM PDT by dglang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

As do I.


227 posted on 03/23/2010 3:06:45 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

Arizona put it up for vote in November on health care a bill that says people who have insurance will keep what they have and those who do not want insurance will not be forced to have it.


228 posted on 03/23/2010 3:06:56 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: historyrepeatz

Hopefully the suit will be a multi-pronged attack. (I’m thinking it will be!)


229 posted on 03/23/2010 3:07:53 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Creek Injun
Same here, i'll be paying cash in a back alley before I give up to these commie basterds .

The Obamstercare and it's related tax burden should be reserved to Deemocrats only..... all others continue life in real world as if nothing happened

230 posted on 03/23/2010 3:10:54 PM PDT by KTM rider ( ..........tell me this really isn't happening ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

I agree. SCOTUS is not going to allow the potentiality of such an egregiously unconstitutional bill that applies to and enslaves every American sit and wait.

It’s too big for them to see that history would be written that they allowed the Amercian people to be shackled by a blatant socialist takeover.

But we can bet the socialists are going to try everything to delay a decision and meanwhile hope one or more of Justices Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Scalia have an accident or illness.


231 posted on 03/23/2010 3:11:58 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Not so sure about that. If the SCOTUS declares it’s unConstitutional - good luck keeping any part of it intact (esp. if the conclusion is that the States have jurisdiction over Health Care and not the Feds.) That would pretty much cook its goose. Just because it says it can’t be touched doesn’t MEAN it can’t be touched. (Remember the Reid portion where they tried to insert that no future Congress could dismantle it and the Republicans said “Yeah, right. Good luck with that.”)?


232 posted on 03/23/2010 3:12:06 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: antonico

No, it’s a question of the Constitution and what the 10th amendment means. THAT’S the issue - nothing else.


233 posted on 03/23/2010 3:13:49 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
They anticipated lawsuits in the bill:

Section 155

If any provision of this division, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of the provisions of this division and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected.

In other words, it looks like a suit has to be filed on every part of the bill to kill it. It can't be killed as a whole.

This is boilerplate stuff ...

However, the gas that drives the engine in this bill is the insurance mandate - if that provision alone is ruled unconstitutional, then the whole thing goes ...

The only way for the insurance companies to offer insurance to all, no exemption of pre-existing conditions, and at the same rates [no charging more for smokers or obese people] is to make up for it in volume [young healthy people who rarely get sick]. More money coming in than is going out

If mandatory healthcare is unconstitutional - so is the fine for not having it. SAVE BIG BUX - no prenium, no fine !!! AND, per the bill, if you do get sick - you can sign up for it then, pay your prenium, and get treated.

'Course since healthcare is no longer mandatory, you can drop your coverage once you get well and repeat the process next time you get sick ...

234 posted on 03/23/2010 3:15:54 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Tenessee’s governor Bredesen congratulated Obama on passage of the bill but is also on record as saying TN can’t afford it.

Dat's Right ...

Check out: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2477926/posts

235 posted on 03/23/2010 3:18:21 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
Hasn't this been upheld (or at least never struck down before) by SCOTUS? Virtually every bill has sweetheart deals.

To me, it's not equal protection (Amendment XIV) that should be pursued, it's uniform taxation (Article I Section 8 Clause 1) that should be pursued.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

-PJ

236 posted on 03/23/2010 3:18:51 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Democrat Dean

Exactly right. It’s a jurisdiction issue. If the FEDS don’t have the right to impose such a bill on the states because they are not granted that power in the Constitution - the whole thing is null and void. (Praying this happens!!)


237 posted on 03/23/2010 3:20:08 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Section 155
If any provision of this division, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of the provisions of this division and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected.

It's very possible that the Supreme Court could rule that very clause as unconstitutional, and therefore nonbinding on the entirety of the bill.

238 posted on 03/23/2010 3:21:10 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

.....”there are more fine legal scholars and constitutional law professors all over the internet that say there is not one part of the Constitution that would leave this bill standing”......

I do so hope you are correct and I am simply erring in comparing apples to oranges.....Also, things have changed since we saw this bills passage taken thru congress as it did. They have shown how dirty they will play...and unashamedly....Looks like the good guys need to get tough as well. Thanks for the link.


239 posted on 03/23/2010 3:21:45 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

God has a sense of humor!


240 posted on 03/23/2010 3:24:11 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-337 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson