This case is completely different from that of Social Security.
The budgetary concerns are hyperbole. An AG legal staffs will motion, respond, reply, research, communicate, coordinate, strategize and set tactics using about 4 FT attorneys and the same number of assistants and secretaries. It’s hardly a concern as these are government attorneys who are on salary and production.
As far as ‘others’ stating slim chances for success, there are more fine legal scholars and constitutional law professors all over the internet that say there is not one part of the Constitution that would leave this bill standing.
Amnesty and Cap& Trade will further infuriate the public and bring them to the boiling point. That is not good but I personally would welcome it as it would usher in a set of real conservative reforms.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2477434/posts?page=52#52
.....”there are more fine legal scholars and constitutional law professors all over the internet that say there is not one part of the Constitution that would leave this bill standing”......
I do so hope you are correct and I am simply erring in comparing apples to oranges.....Also, things have changed since we saw this bills passage taken thru congress as it did. They have shown how dirty they will play...and unashamedly....Looks like the good guys need to get tough as well. Thanks for the link.