Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Best ever find of soft tissue (muscle and blood) in a fossil (evos claim it is 18 mya!!!)
CMI ^ | November 11, 2009 | Carl Wieland

Posted on 11/11/2009 9:29:38 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

A salamander allegedly “18 million years old” is the latest fossil to produce astonishingly well preserved soft tissue. This time, it’s muscle tissue, and it is supposedly the most pristine example yet.

Background—the “dinosaur connection”...

(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Georgia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: antiscienceevos; atomsdonotexist; catastrophism; catholic; charismatic; christian; christianmythology; creation; creationnescience; crevo; darwiniacs; dinosaurs; electricityisfire; evangelical; evolution; evoreligionexposed; godsgravesglyphs; gravityisahoax; intelligentdesign; judaism; maryschweitzer; paleontology; protestant; science; softtissue; superstition; templeofdarwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-253 last
To: RegulatorCountry
As far as your not worshipping any book written by man, well, that's very good, ColdWater.

That's a keeper!

241 posted on 11/12/2009 8:41:50 PM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Oh, I remember now. You were the one misquoting Einstein.


242 posted on 11/12/2009 9:23:26 PM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
going so far as to lie, that you had possession of Evolution Of Physics,

I don't lie. Ergo. Your post must be a lie.

243 posted on 11/12/2009 9:33:23 PM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Your memory is as faulty as your understanding of special relativity or the Bible, ColdWater.

Please see the FR thread in question to refresh your memory, starting here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2274459/posts?q=1&;page=451


244 posted on 11/13/2009 3:31:43 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
I don't lie. Ergo. Your post must be a lie.

A faulty premise leads to all manner of lunacy, ColdWater.

245 posted on 11/13/2009 3:41:25 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

The Bible says that God ‘spoke’. The Word of God says that. I merely relayed that to you.


246 posted on 11/13/2009 4:08:16 AM PST by RoadGumby (Ask me about Ducky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
"They don't, they have fossilised soft tissue. From the source of this confusion, "

Even still, an 18 million year old fossilized soft tissue still seems like an extreme belief.
247 posted on 11/13/2009 4:17:55 AM PST by Jaime2099 (Human Evolution and the God of the Bible are not compatible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Jaime2099
Even still, an 18 million year old fossilized soft tissue still seems like an extreme belief.

Doesn't seem much different that than fossilized wood. Fossilized wood is more common because wood decays more slowly that animal tissue.

248 posted on 11/13/2009 5:56:10 AM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Upon reflection, I have considered that Darwin was a man much ravaged by the conflict between his culture and his conclusions; heir to his piety but victim of his pride.

Careful not to offend in his earlier works and defiant in his newfound convictions in his last published papers.

Perhaps only history and society are the true judges of the difference between heroes and pariahs.

With time, new shoes become old friends.


249 posted on 11/13/2009 9:39:49 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
"Doesn't seem much different that than fossilized wood."

Good grief, as common as wood, you are being very closed minded about this discovery.
250 posted on 11/13/2009 3:11:46 PM PST by Jaime2099 (Human Evolution and the God of the Bible are not compatible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

However, Ptolemy placed Venus’ deferent and epicycle entirely inside the sphere of the Sun (between the Sun and Mercury), but this was arbitrary; he could just as easily have swapped Venus and Mercury and put them on the other side of the Sun, or made any other arrangement of Venus and Mercury, as long as they were always near a line running from the Earth through the Sun, such as placing the center of the Venus epicycle near the Sun. In this case, if the Sun is the source of all the light, under the Ptolemaic system:

If Venus is between Earth and the Sun, the phase of Venus must always be crescent or all dark. If Venus is beyond the Sun, the phase of Venus must always be gibbous or full.

But Galileo saw Venus at first small and full, and later large and crescent.

This showed that with a Ptolemaic cosmology, the Venus epicycle can be neither completely inside nor completely outside of the orbit of the Sun. As a result, Ptolemaics abandoned the idea that the epicycle of Venus was completely inside the Sun, and later 17th century competition between astronomical cosmologies focused on variations of Tycho Brahe’s Tychonic system (in which the Earth was still at the center of the universe, and around it revolved the Sun, but all other planets revolved around the Sun in one massive set of epicycles), or variations on the Copernican system.

wikipedia.com


251 posted on 11/13/2009 5:24:05 PM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Natufian
Sorry, but GGG´s contention is *indeed* that it wasn´t fossilized. It´s central to his conceit.

Nat, You have comprehension problems. The bones were 'fossilized' AND there was still soft tissue that was well preserved inside the fossil. When the minerals were removed, the soft tissue was left behind. Is that so difficult to understand?

Typical evo trying to understand science:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmsuYeztVbs

252 posted on 11/13/2009 6:45:54 PM PST by Tramonto (Live Free of Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

When God created Man, did he cross his arms and blink (Jeannie style) or wiggle his nose (Samantha style).
____________
What’s your best guess, troll?


253 posted on 05/07/2010 8:10:05 PM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-253 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson