Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Do Americans Believe About Creationism and Evolution?</
john in springfield | 10/23/2009 | jis (vanity)

Posted on 10/23/2009 8:18:13 PM PDT by john in springfield

What Do Americans Believe About Creationism and Evolution?

After spending time on some of the recent discussions here at FR about Young Earth Creationism (YEC) and other points of view (which I will call Old Earth Creationism (OEC) and Naturalistic Evolution), I found myself wondering: how many FReepers (and how many Americans) hold each particular view?

Obviously, there aren't any statistics on FReepers. But there are on Americans as a whole, and on certain groups of Americans.

The best general resource I've found so far on people's viewpoints is located here. I will summarize some of those here.

(Note: This page uses slightly different terms for a couple of these viewpoints, but as far as I can tell, they mean the same thing.)

American adults as a whole:

About 45% accept the Young Earth Creationist viewpoint, about 37% accept the Old Earth Creationist viewpoint, and around 12% to 14% accept the Naturalistic Evolution viewpoint.

This has held fairly steady over the past 25 years or so. The percentage who believe in NE may have increased slightly, but overall, the numbers have held fairly steady.

A CBS News poll gave a bit different percentages: YEC 55%, OEC 27%, NE 13%.

Observations:

There are a lot of people who believe in young earth creationism, and there are also a lot of people who believe in old earth creationism as well.

The vast majority of Americans believe in God.

The majority of Americans believe in evolution.

American college graduates (Gallup Poll, 1991):

The numbers change significantly among the college-educated:

YEC: 25%
OEC: 54%
NE: 17%

It is interesting to me that most - a full 54% - college-educated Americans accept the Old-Earth Creationist (or theistic evolutionist) view.

Note also the effect that a college education seems to have: With a few exceptions, people who go to college don't stop believing in God. However, quite a few do seem to shift from YEC to OEC.

This graph also means that an awful lot of people who don't go to college believe in YEC rather than in either OEC or NE.

Note that while this poll is nearly 20 years old, based on what we know from some other polls, overall beliefs do not seem to have changed greatly during this time.

Scientists (Gallup Poll, 1997):

YEC: 5%
OEC: 40%
NE: 55%

Note: The word "scientist" seems to be very vague in this poll, which apparently includes a lot of people with professional degrees in fields completely unrelated to biology, geology, etc.

In any event, a majority of "scientists" don't seem to believe that God was involved in the development of life on earth. It's not a very large majority, though. "Scientists" are divided as to whether God was involved. Most of those who think He was believe that this involvement included the process of evolution.

Earth and Life Scientists

A 1987 Newsweek article claimed that well under 1% of earth and life scientists in the United States support the YEC viewpoint of origins. While I have some doubts about the reliability of their estimate (a nationwide total of 700 YEC earth/life scientists seems just too small to me), that number would still seem to be a very small one.

However, given that only 5% of "scientists" support YEC, the under-1% figure may well be true. I just don't know. Nor do I have access to the original 1987 Newsweek article to see exactly how they got their information.

If there's another poll or two out there on this, it might be interesting to know about.

Beliefs of Christians Concerning Origins

A 2007 Harris Poll showed the following percentages of Christians who accept the theory of evolution:

Catholics: 43%
Protestants: 30%
"Born-Again Christians": 16%

Can One Believe in God and Evolution?

Finally, a 2005 CBS Poll stated that a full two thirds (67%) of Americans believe that it's possible for one to believe both in God and in evolution.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2009polls; chat; creation; creationism; evolution; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 441-453 next last
To: betty boop
Some people do, of course, fail to respect that the scientific method is not appropriate for all phenomena. And others (on the other end) seem to think that God is threatened by science.

Personally, I simply have never been able to conceive of God being threatened by truth. Of course, if you really take this position, then you have to be prepared for the real possibility that your understanding of certain things will change.

101 posted on 10/24/2009 11:09:29 AM PDT by john in springfield (One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: john in springfield
Personally, I simply have never been able to conceive of God being threatened by truth

God cannot be threatened. Only distorted beliefs and practices can be threatened by the truth.

102 posted on 10/24/2009 11:11:12 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
My suspicion is Neo-Darwinist theory is insufficiently comprehensive to describe/explain the phenomenon of evolution.

And Einstein's General Theory of Relativity is insufficiently comprehensive to describe the phenomenom of the universe but man is always advancing unless research is shutdown by narrow-minded control freeks.

103 posted on 10/24/2009 11:14:15 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: john in springfield; Alamo-Girl
Personally, I simply have never been able to conceive of God being threatened by truth. Of course, if you really take this position, then you have to be prepared for the real possibility that your understanding of certain things will change.

How can Truth be threatened by truth? And I really do take this position, and I totally agree with your "takeaway": "then you have to be prepared for the real possibility that your understanding of certain things will change."

All I know for sure is that the more I know, the more I realize how much I don't know. But this doesn't trouble me; for I'm completely happy to continue on the quest, by the light of the Holy Spirit....

104 posted on 10/24/2009 11:19:10 AM PDT by betty boop (Without God man neither knows which way to go, nor even understands who he is. —Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
...man is always advancing unless research is shutdown by narrow-minded control freeks.

Certain lines of research don't get funded nowadays. To my mind, the real "control freaks" are the folks in academe, the professional journals, and politicized funding agencies who are mainly in the business of maintaining the status quo; for it benefits them. But I think science suffers....

105 posted on 10/24/2009 11:29:10 AM PDT by betty boop (Without God man neither knows which way to go, nor even understands who he is. —Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
“Just because the earth is billions of years old does not necessarily mean that life on earth is also billions of years old as well.

There is no room for a mix of creationist theory with evolutionary theory. They are mutually exclusive.”

I think that is pretty much the view of many others. The age of the earth and the age of life on it need not be the same or even close from what I've learned.

106 posted on 10/24/2009 11:53:35 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
The age of the earth and the age of life on it need not be the same or even close from what I've learned.

But, according to YEC'ers, accepting an old earth is denying the Bible and totally non-Christian.

107 posted on 10/24/2009 11:55:05 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Maybe you're confusing Darwinism and belief in an earh much older than life AND/OR “Once again, you are limiting God's powers to your earth-bound perceptions.”

I thought that last part just too good to keep to myself and that you might remember it.

108 posted on 10/24/2009 12:20:26 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

It may be too good to keep it to yourself but since noone can understand your post, you are keeping it to yourself.


109 posted on 10/24/2009 12:23:36 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

That last part about earth bound perceptions was rather silly, wasn’t it? I’ll put it back where I found it and ignore any further posts.


110 posted on 10/24/2009 12:33:23 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
That last part about earth bound perceptions was rather silly, wasn’t it? I’ll put it back where I found it and ignore any further posts.

Don't you mean:

'That last part about earth bound perceptions was rather silly, wasn’t it? I’ll put it back where I found it and I'll not make any further posts.'

111 posted on 10/24/2009 12:34:56 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: john in springfield

“I thought this should be educational for all” bookmark

:-)


112 posted on 10/24/2009 12:36:17 PM PDT by Canedawg (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

“Come to think of it, the longer one spends in a communist “education” system, the more likely one is to be a revolutionary evolutionist. Indeed, for those who go all the way to the top of a communist “educational” system, I would imagine that there would be very few non-communists left among their classmates. In fact, I am quite confident of this, as I have watched this story repeat itself over and over in the books written by Soviet, Red Chinese, Vietnamese, Eastern European, and Cuban defectors. In most cases they become more and more idealistic about communism the longer they remain in their indoctrination system, and then they become dissalusioned when they finally enter the “society” of their respective country-sized prison camps, and are soon dreaming of escape.

It seems the same thing holds true in the hard-left American university system. The higher American students rise in Indoctination U., the more likely they are to become an libtarted, evo-atheist, Obamabots. Indeed, isn’t the Obama administration filled with Ivy Leaguers who have earned graduate degrees from what David Horowitz would call Indoctrination U.?”

YOU are EXACTLY RIGHT!


113 posted on 10/24/2009 1:34:20 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

Comment #114 Removed by Moderator

To: whattajoke; Agamemnon

Lighten up there, Francis U.R. Whatajoke. I just checked your posting history, and you have variously referred to Creaionists and IDers as insane, stupid, dolts, idiots, fundies, dumbasses, goofballs, rampage shooters, and...drumroll please...”SOCIALLY RETARDED.”

Now get out a mirror and start swearing at your sad, hypocritically self like you just told off Agamemnon. Or does the PC rulebook exempt you from the prohibition from saying such things if you have (or claim to have) a special needs son?

PS Is your Darwin Central screenname 38sw? Just curious.


115 posted on 10/24/2009 2:48:20 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: Agamemnon

==The “joke” doth protest too much.

You are absolutely, 100% correct...see my last.


117 posted on 10/24/2009 2:55:50 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon; whattajoke

My bad, it turns out the Whattajoke’s screenname is Whattajoke on Darwin Central as well. Or perhaps Whattajoke is both people. At any rate, Whattajoke has been using the word “retarded” to refer to creationists FReepers on Darwin Central as well. See link:

http://forum.darwincentral.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=22227&start=425

PS Whattajoke... Just out of curiousity, do you have two screennames over at DC?


118 posted on 10/24/2009 3:02:37 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I noticed your and your minions trend of using “retreads” when you meant to use the word “retards”.


119 posted on 10/24/2009 3:06:20 PM PDT by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

“Come to think of it, the longer one spends in a communist “education” system, the more likely one is to be a revolutionary evolutionist.”

So.....education is bad?


120 posted on 10/24/2009 3:12:04 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 441-453 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson