Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To The States: Should We Talk About Secession?
Market-Ticker ^ | 11 October 2009 | Karl Denninger

Posted on 10/11/2009 3:28:57 PM PDT by combat_boots

I'm going to go back to this quote by Barney Frank of the US House, because it says everything those in state and local governments need to know:

Barney Frank, the Massachusetts Democrat who is chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said in an interview that the defaults were, in essence, worth it.

“I don’t think it’s a bad thing that the bad loans occurred,” he said. “It was an effort to keep prices from falling too fast. That’s a policy.”

Got it? It's a policy to screw the state and local governments.

Huh, you say? It's simple, really: State and local governments rely on property tax revenues. Yet defaulted mortgages don't pay property taxes. Yes, there's a lien on the property but this doesn't help the municipal budget now.

And suffer they are:

Tax revenues used to pay teachers and fuel police cars continue to trail even the most pessimistic expectations, despite the cash from the economic stimulus plan pouring into state coffers.

"It's crazy. It's really just unbelievable," said Scott Pattison, executive

(Excerpt) Read more at market-ticker.denninger.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; 111th; bho44; bloggers; business; donttreadonme; economy; liberty; secession; states; statesrights; unfundedmandates; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-228 next last
To: OpusatFR

Absolutely not. That type of thinking plays right into the hands of those who know that the strength of the US is in ALL the states being together.

Breaking up the country into states and regions is EXACTLY what those who want this country devolved into a non-entity, powerless and small, want for the future.

______________________

This is progressivist, centralized thinking — NOT the thinking of most of our Founders. NOT what the Constitution defined. NOT what Conservatives should affirm. This is the thinking of Statism and Empire, not States Rights and Republic!

How can Conservatives EVER win back office, much less save the nation, if some “Conservatives” are “big government, neo-Conservatives?” Restore the STATES to their rightful place, and that will FORCE Washington into THEIR rightful place! THREATEN secession, REGAIN 10th Amendment PROTECTIONS! SCARE Washington DC (and all those who reside therein) and ONLY THEN can we win!...

I’m starting to sound like Jesse Jackson’s white twin LOL


81 posted on 10/12/2009 9:36:55 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

I’d much rather send the leeches elsewhere to their socialist utopia they have always dreamed about. There are plenty of other places they’d feel more “at home”.


82 posted on 10/12/2009 9:39:55 PM PDT by RasterMaster (The only way to open a LIEberal mind is with a brick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calex59

The traditional fears of a constitutional convention are ungrounded. This is because any changes must be approved by 38 of the 50 States. There is just no possible way that 3/4ths of the State legislatures will approve any kind of radical changes.

Despite the conservative wish list of changes that we would like to see, the #1 priority of the individual States would be to restore the balance of power between the States and the federal government. Right now, they just imagine this in the reinforcement of the 10th Amendment; but as a convention became more realistic, they would likely change their starting point to the repeal of the 17th Amendment.

But where would they go from there? Again, from their point of view, they want the federal government to stop oppressing the States. This is very different from addressing the complaints of the people, other than by imagining the States as the spokesmen for their people, that is, that to get to the people, the federal government has to go through the States.

This creates a dilemma with the income tax, because the current constitution forbids the federal government from directly taxing the States, and there is no way the States would approve that.

A balanced budget amendment wouldn’t fool the States for a minute, because the federals have mastered the art of evading such restrictions with off budget items, multi-year contracts, mandatory appropriations, and other tricks.

And nobody trusts the POTUS enough to give them a line item veto.

So just to restore a balance between federalism and anti-federalism, the convention has its work cut out for it. To make matters much worse, they will have to consider amazingly unpopular things such as renouncing the US national debt, ending government largesse programs like SS, Medicare and Medicaid, and massive defense cuts.

The one thing the convention will not suffer from is radicalism. But getting 38 States to agree on anything will be like sweeping ants into a pile. So at least a year will be spent haggling, before a straw poll of legislatures will be affirmative enough to even attempt a vote.


83 posted on 10/12/2009 9:45:54 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
We should be talking about semi autonomous states with a greatly reduced role of federal government.

BINGO! The money quote of the day! The states created this mess and the states could end it tomorrow. Decommission the Federal "government" NOW!!!

84 posted on 10/12/2009 10:09:43 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Screw the Con Con. Just walk away. If they don't like it, they can try to kill us...
85 posted on 10/12/2009 10:10:43 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
“All conservatives, everywhere in the nation, need to start thinking about where they want to be when it happens.”

How about standing on a pile of dead liberals?

86 posted on 10/12/2009 10:12:12 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If the states aren't sovereign, then why do they have their own constitutions, governors, legislatures, courts, militias, right to mint coins, and on and on.... We were here first. The Federal “government” can go to hell...
87 posted on 10/12/2009 10:16:44 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mek1959
Maybe he should think about the idea a bit before he spouts off about the USSC saying a “State can't secede”. Whether it would win or not is another discussion, but of course a State, which is SOVERIGN can secede. After all, didn't we secede from Britain?

Nine clowns in bathrobes won't have much effect in the next revolution. They had best stay neutral...

88 posted on 10/12/2009 10:18:21 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
We don't need no steeeeenkin Con Con...
89 posted on 10/12/2009 10:20:21 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

That looked well-thought out.


90 posted on 10/12/2009 10:21:23 PM PDT by wastedyears (If I don't have a right to play defense, then I'll go on offense. - FReeper Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

I dont think the system does work. I think that is why we are seeing a big chasm between the people erupt like never before.


91 posted on 10/12/2009 11:01:50 PM PDT by GeronL ("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

Nearly half the people love what is going on. You can talk about “we the people” all day but half those people want their free Obama money.


92 posted on 10/12/2009 11:03:53 PM PDT by GeronL ("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

and whats to stop the federal government from crushing the first state to do this? The media will cry “coup” and “traitors” and you can bet they’ll be assassinations by the CIA and a large number of Union troops.


93 posted on 10/12/2009 11:05:52 PM PDT by GeronL ("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

we already have a 10th amendment, what makes you think they’ll listen to another one?


94 posted on 10/12/2009 11:07:25 PM PDT by GeronL ("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

A Constitutional Convention would be a disaster dominated by radical leftists.


95 posted on 10/12/2009 11:10:12 PM PDT by GeronL ("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

Texas is now getting to be controlled by the left, little by little. I think Nebraska or Wyoming would be a better place for a conservative.


96 posted on 10/12/2009 11:12:09 PM PDT by GeronL ("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Socialists will stay in a free state. Look at history. They want to undermine it from the inside like they did to America. Thats why all those leftists who protested Vietnam became Professors et al.

Socialists believe in corrupting the institutions they want to destroy.


97 posted on 10/12/2009 11:14:11 PM PDT by GeronL ("On my twelfth day in office, Nobel nominated me..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: politicalmerc
"NO we should talk about getting rid of this loser who won the Presidency."

Agreed, and who likely stole the election via his leftist cohorts in ACORN.

98 posted on 10/12/2009 11:23:41 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never "free")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The state doesn’t matter except that it be a state that basically leans conservative and one that we can make lean more conservative.

Texas may be leaning left now, but if every conservative in a liberal sweat hole were to pick up stakes and move, we could turn it solidly conservative again.

Also, I need an ocean.


99 posted on 10/12/2009 11:29:00 PM PDT by Ronin (Nemo me impune lacesset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

On so many levels, you’re dreaming- you’re in la la land!


100 posted on 10/12/2009 11:29:55 PM PDT by matthew fuller (BHO-Aks not what you can do for your country; Aks only what you can do for ME ME ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-228 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson