Posted on 09/04/2009 11:36:07 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, and INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: 10 U.S.C. §938 and Army Regulation 27-10
COUNT I: DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DUE TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUTES, ILLEGAL ORDERS, AND LACK OF ADMINISTRATIVE OR LEGAL REMEDY
COUNT II: INJUNCTION AGAINST RETALIATION FOR CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR STATUS
COUNT III: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT: EXECUTIVE ORDERS OF Jan. 21, 2009
COUNT IV: Declaratory Judgment & Permanent Injunction PLAINTIFF SEEKS A FIVE-PART DECLARATORTY JUDGMENT AS WELL AS A PERMANENT INJUNCTION TO PROTECT CONSCIENTIOUS DISOBEDIENCE TO UNLAWFUL ORDERS FROM RETALIATION
COUNT V: AN OFFICER’S RIGHT OR DUTY TO CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT?
COUNT VI: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT---5 U.S.C. §702, AND FEDERAL COMMON LAW apply to the PRESIDENT AS COMMANDER-in-CHIEF
COUNT VI: THE CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE PEOPLE; THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION
COUNT VIII: CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ACTIONABLE UNDER 42 U.S.C. §§1983, 1988(a)(a)
(Excerpt) Read more at archive.org ...
You have a problem w/the military protecting the USA from enemies outside the USA and within?
I'm active duty. I have a problem with people violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Ya you got it
Ya you got it
I have a problem with anyone with a disregard for The Constitution.
1. The State of Hawaii has authenticated his Certificate of Live Birth. That is game, set, match. Don't feed me the "he won't show the long form version" bullcrap. Not buying. Certified copies of State records are presumptively authentic in all courts of law.
2. Even assuming that Pres. Obama was illegitimate - that doesn't make the orders for her to deploy illegal. SecDef Gates, and other personnel confirmed by Congress - NOT the President - cut her orders. They are legal.
And I have a problem with promoting sedition and mutiny in the ranks.
For legal documents, yes, but for here, they don’t have to be. Nor do they have to be in a large size. It’s easier to read.
Why did you feel the need to capitalize in your post?
They “cost” a lot less than the ineligible usurper failing to provide ANY documentation to the AMERICAN citizens.
So far the tab is up to about $3 to 4 TRILLION the Kenyan has spent. Maybe the judiciary should do it’s job.
This captain, like Major Cook, have a question that begs tehm to violate their conscience-and you have a problem with that?
While I do not know this offcier’s history, she , like Cook, probably have served in harm’s way already, but now, under the question of lawful command authority (CIC) they must ask teh question.
Mindless they are not, patriotic, they are.
You swore an oath to the defend the constitution the same as they have.
Why do you think they are “war resisters”? Are they not in uniform, have they not (at least Cook -on the record) have indicated they have no problem prosecuting the defense of this country (and have), but they want to know for certain that they are doing so lawfully under this administration.
Thanks for your service.
Sure you are active duty. An Islamic usurper took control of “your” country. Now you have American boys dying in Islamic countries with a phony islamic CIC.
I would bet intel from the Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood moles in the white hut is getting back to the Taliban and Al Qeada.
They are acting under orders and the authority of the President who is the Commander In Chief in times of war. They issue orders by dir.
The crux of the issue is that if the CIC is not legally authorized to be CIC, then all subsequent actions are illegal. This is not sedition, nor is it mutiny. There are simply too many questions that the man refuses to answer that are questioning his legitimacy.
So did this guy. And this guy.
While I do not know this offcier’s history, she , like Cook, probably have served in harm’s way already, but now, under the question of lawful command authority (CIC) they must ask teh question.
That's not what they're doing. They're suing to avoid going to Afghanistan or Iraq because they lost an election.
Why do you think they are “war resisters”? Are they not in uniform, have they not (at least Cook -on the record) have indicated they have no problem prosecuting the defense of this country (and have), but they want to know for certain that they are doing so lawfully under this administration.
They're no different than the war resistors that said Iraq and Afghanistan were illegal because they weren't authorized by the UN.
BUMP. A class action by Military members and vets would be excellent news
How those Obama kneepads fitting? Comfortable?
First of all, even assuming the underlying assumption of your argument, that is not true. President Obama, even if he were technically unqualified, still holds apparent authority - and Congress, by seating him, has ratified his apparent authority with actual authority.
This is first year law school stuff.
Not nearly as much as Obama not releasing his birth certificate
What violation? She’s demanding proof of the CIC’s credentials to legally give orders.
Ooooo... original.
That's called insubordination. That's a crime under the UCMJ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.