[jude24]

You have a problem w/the military protecting the USA from enemies outside the USA and within?

I'm active duty. I have a problem with people violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

[presently no screen name]

I have a problem with anyone with a disregard for The Constitution.

[Manly Warrior]

This captain, like Major Cook, have a question that begs tehm to violate their conscience-and you have a problem with that?

While I do not know this offcier’s history, she , like Cook, probably have served in harm’s way already, but now, under the question of lawful command authority (CIC) they must ask teh question.

Mindless they are not, patriotic, they are.

You swore an oath to the defend the constitution the same as they have.

Why do you think they are “war resisters”? Are they not in uniform, have they not (at least Cook -on the record) have indicated they have no problem prosecuting the defense of this country (and have), but they want to know for certain that they are doing so lawfully under this administration.

Thanks for your service.

[Frantzie]

Sure you are active duty. An Islamic usurper took control of “your” country. Now you have American boys dying in Islamic countries with a phony islamic CIC.

I would bet intel from the Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood moles in the white hut is getting back to the Taliban and Al Qeada.

[pissant]

What violation? She’s demanding proof of the CIC’s credentials to legally give orders.

[Red Steel]

I'm active duty. I have a problem with people violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Problem. the problem may be on top of the chain of command.

[AmericanVictory]

In your opinion, then, the UCMJ trumps the Contitution. It's the old Nuremberg defense. As I recall that's the one you learned about in the first year of your law school. How would your teachings apply in the Hollister case?