Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rjsimmon
The crux of the issue is that if the CIC is not legally authorized to be CIC, then all subsequent actions are illegal.

First of all, even assuming the underlying assumption of your argument, that is not true. President Obama, even if he were technically unqualified, still holds apparent authority - and Congress, by seating him, has ratified his apparent authority with actual authority.

This is first year law school stuff.

36 posted on 09/04/2009 12:14:15 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: jude24

So the Nazis said at Nuremberg. Must have been first year stuff in their law school. Apparently you attended the same one that they did.


98 posted on 09/04/2009 6:09:53 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: jude24
First of all, even assuming the underlying assumption of your argument, that is not true.

If you are assuming the underlying assumption, then you cannot claim it not true. The argument is whether or not Obama is legally qualified to hold the office of President. Until that is settled, then the Captain has every right to question his authority.

President Obama, even if he were technically unqualified, still holds apparent authority - and Congress, by seating him, has ratified his apparent authority with actual authority.

If the Congress abdicates its authority, then we have anarchy. Simply because Congress passes a law does not mean that the law is Constitutional.

That is first year Constitutional Law stuff.

123 posted on 09/06/2009 6:01:10 AM PDT by rjsimmon (1-20-2013 The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson