Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
sokay, I had to laugh though, you skipped a generation...but it’s obvious isn’t it, they knew each other before...
I don’t think that those people go over there... LOL...
Exposing you for the liar you are is right on topic since your spouting boasts for which you offer no verification. Your veracity on a thread is what that link is all about. Just think about how many are right now finding out what a liar you are!
I jumped into this collossal thread after seeing something potentially amusing on the Comments tab.
So, I don't really know what else FreeAlaska32 may have claimed or the correctness of it.
But, I do agree with her(?) that this BC, as well as the purported Hawaiian BC, is a distraction, since he's already clearly ineligible, by his own admission.
new = knew
Must .. go .. to ... sleep
Thanks! Subways are healthier, too. Wonder if they deliver.
Well, it might be your topic, but it wasn’t the one I saw here... LOL...
And the facts speak for themselves, and have never changed... (getting “on topic” of course here...)...
You do know (I hope...) that there is *no legal requirement* for a candidate to show his birth certificate... now all you’ve got to do is show that law and that’s it... but...
And of course, the *big problem* is that if there was a law that required a candidate to show his birth certificate, we would all be looking at it right now. But, that’s the big thing that you can never get around... hence the “fact of the matter”...
Like I said, the facts speak for themselves... LOL...
Then, after one realizes that there is *no legal requirement* for a candidate to show his birth certificate, it because real obvious that the solution is to *get a law* that requires it... :-)
And that’s precisely why I’ve been posting since the time of the election to enact a state law to make it *legally required* for a candidate to show his birth certificate or else he cannot be on the ballot.
But, the weird thing is that you’ve always avoided giving any support to actually *getting* the birth certificate this way (by a law), which is fairly strange, since that is what would get it for you...
Very weird indeed — but fortunately there are a few people who have promoted this and the legislation has been started in Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri and Arizona...
However, it is very strange that the very people who say that they *want to see the birth certificate* don’t seem to want to do a thing to get a law that say you *must show* your birth certificate... kinda weird, actually...
This is probably fake.
Gosh, what a hard-nosed investigator. Dug down a whole 232 posts deep and finally came to the definitive conclusion that the document is a fake, eh?
LOL!
I’ve seen your posts proving ST is a troll. You’ll have to stand in line.
p.s. check out the new keyword BFRCoLBTWAWLOL
Hold on now, he did say ‘probably’.
Ive seen your posts proving ST is a troll. Youll have to stand in line.
p.s. check out the new keyword BFRCoLBTWAWLOL
I supplement it with apples, oatmeal and triscuit...and eggbeaters...for variety.
Since Barack, together with his KGB trained cousin, Odinga, were campaigning to force Kenya, a Christian Republic, into accepting Sharia law, it may be that the Kenyan government will be reluctant to cauterize their files to protect him. The Taitz document does provide tracking numbers, and reconstructing a large volume of birth certificates could be next to impossible, with so many copies already in circulation.
Is it possible that original documents have been cataloged in Britain, or elsewhere? There have certainly been many documents in U.S. archives microfilmed or digitized (which I presume was the case with the Obama passport files “cauterized” last year in State Department Archives). I'm not in that business, but know there are conservative protocols about documents such as those Sandy Burglar secreted in his pants to facilitate removal from the National Archives. I can't imagine that those documents weren't photographed, or digitally scanned.
Perhaps, but I don't think I fired off an attack on anyone personally after reading one of perhaps a hundred of his posts on the subject.
I'd be too embarassed to do something that lame.
But, the only problem is that “troll” as far as you’re concerned and in your own mind — doesn’t exist on Free Republic as far as its concerned. If me posting things that you simply didn’t like to hear was a troll, and that was the definition that Free Republic used (in your own mind), then I wouldn’t be still posting to you now... would I...
So, you should tell everyone the definition of troll, too...
A troll is someone who doesnt agree with my opinion and has the audacity to say so!
You already tried to convince the mods a long time ago about that and got nowhere... If I remember right, they just told you to forget it... But, really you’ve got to work on the basic principle that Free Republic operates under... which is everyone doesn’t think the way you do... and so, it’s just one of those facts of life... what can I say... LOL...
The *real problem* here, you see — is that you just don’t want to recognize the basic fact that exists in this birth certificate issue — and you always try to divert it over to troll, which is just like a kid plugging his ears and saying, “I can’t hear you!” ... :-)
The problem is that there is *no legal requirement* for a candidate to show his birth certificate. If you could *come back to reality* and see that, you wouldn’t be having this problem, now would you?
But, you can’t face that reality and someone telling you that reality... so you do the only thing you can... divert the issue away from the birth certificate onto something else...
The fact of the matter is once you realize that there is *no legal requirement* for a candidate to show his birth certificate, you then know *automatically* what comes next. A normal citizen knows that there needs to be a law *mandating* that a candidate must show his birth certificate or else he cannot be on the ballot of that state... easy...
I don’t know why you can’t see it and have to always divert away from the birth certificate issue and onto the troll definition that only exists inside your own head...
Not exactly. This time we are writing to you. Knock it off!
15 years for Abercrombie to get his doctorate degree at UH?...hmmm.
I see the Congressman was on the ‘fast track.’
now this is a good post to go nighty night on
Dragging your problems in from January into an August thread is not recommended, particularly when acting as if you have some sort of authority or prior management approval.
As we have asked everyone, if you feel there is an urgent or serious problem which needs our immediate attention, please just use the abuse button. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.