Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
I think it is a very serious matter that people keep posting the wrong law and making claims as if it applied .
I beg to differ.
Native born = kid born in US
Natural born = kid born in US (or US jurisdiction i.e. military base) AND both parents being US citizens
If there was not a distinction between the two, there would have been not need for a Sentate committee and vote to iron out McCain’s eligibility. The founding fathers included this term in the Constitution for POTUS eligibility to prevent loyalties to other countries.
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html
...and the "president of the world."
Another one of the endless ironies associate with this creature.
Stanley Dunham or Anna Obama
Did she obtain a passport (or later, a SSN) as a “married woman” and under what name?
She would have needed a “valid” marriage license to obtain a passport under “Anna Obama” or another married name.
In the 60’s, could 18yr olds get their own passports without parental permission?
And what on earth are they talking about “Dates all screwed up”?I think they are very confused about the document having more than 1 date on it... it's WAY over their (non-multitasking, narrow minded, hollow) heads.
3. January 13, 1941 to December 23, 1952
If you were born between January 13, 1941 and December 23, 1952, you automatically acquired U.S. citizenship if both your parents were U.S. citizens and at least one had a prior residence in the United States. You didn’t have to do anything special to keep your U.S. citizenship.
If only one parent was a U.S. citizen, that parent must have lived in the United States for at least ten years prior to your birth, and at least five of those years must have been after your parent reached the age of 16. To keep your citizenship, you must have lived in the United States for at least two years between the ages of 14 and 28 (called a residence requirement). However, as a result of a U.S. Supreme Court decision, if you were born after October 9, 1952, your parent still had to fulfill the residence requirement in order to pass citizenship to you, but your own residence requirement for retaining U.S. citizenship were abolished. If your one U.S. citizen parent was your father and you were born outside of marriage, the same rules applied if your father legally legitimated you before your 21st birthday and you were unmarried at the time.
>KENYAN AMBASSADOR SENDS PROTEST NOTE TO SENATOR BARAK OBAMA<
Hell of a nice find.
Obviously Obama was against them because they were against corruption. Hindsight is 20/20
Read the Nyugen vs INS case for a thorough discussion of this about a man born in 1969 to a US citizen father and foreign mother.
there is an out of wedlock provision..and what does that make the other one???
Even if you don’t understand the statute..READ THE SCOTUS CASE decided in the 21st century speaking about immigration law.
This is where Elg comes in...and in my Opinion..screwed up and mixed the terminology...but nevertheless, it is the law.
Ooops it is Nguyen vs INS. I always get the name screwed up which is why I put it on my profile.
If this is the case, I'm inclined to think that it should to be explained clearly to the American people, in a public forum, with an irrefutable demonstration of the supporting facts, should enough people require an explanation.
the lie is there. they are caught up in their own sin of political correctness.
caught up in their own sin of political correctness gave up their lie
From what we know of Ann, she'd think it would be oh so exotic to have her kid in some far off foreign country. If nothing else a rebellious teen getting back at her parents. O. Sr. would have taken her to show off a new wife to the tribe. It was a win-win for all but the American people.
>Lots of folks are doing that on this thread, and I suppose I can’t blame them, given the explosive nature of the topic.<
I agree. It’s certainly something that makes you take notice.
Obama knows this isn’t going away.
he spent over a million dollars hiding his birth certificate, yet what I really want to see is his college records.
Seems like such a small thing to ask of a leader of a nation doesn’t it? To put all this behind him and actually move on, I would think he would gladly do it, unless of course he is hiding something.
The irony of all this is that if democrats and republicans were treated equally, we would already have seen all his records. There would have been a senate hearing on his eligibility and this would not even be a thread.
http://www.accentre.org.uk/photos.php?pgid=3&photoid=1234876027
Could this pastor Eric Lavender pictured at the link above be the same person as the one pictured with the Hibberts in 2004?
weekend polling always favors Dhimmis
She died with the name Dunham on her social security number.
You have to remember that the marriage license would be considered valid on the surface to anyone looking at it because Obama Sr lied to get it. It was not valid in reality.
Marriage was Void Ab Initio
Don’t have a problem with it being serious. I have a problem with your comments calling people stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.