Which produces two excerpts:
2 pages matching "COAST PROVINCE GENERAL HOSPITAL" in this book:
Page 138
And
Page 140
Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
Looks like the same apartment where SADO had those nekkid pics taken......
No, I did check that out...the floor in those images was timber, not carpet.
Which produces two excerpts:
2 pages matching "COAST PROVINCE GENERAL HOSPITAL" in this book:
Page 138
And
Page 140
Thanks Red Steel. Sorry I couldn’t get to it earlier hoosiermama.
FULL TEXT ELSEWHERE
Megaloblastic anaemia in Africans at the Coast Province General Hospital during 1960
Peter P. Turner, M.D., M.R.C.P., D.P.H., D.J.H.
http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/trstmh/article/PII0035920363900099/abstract
Don’t know if this was ever posted, putting it up for the record:
Friday, December 12, 2008
Why Was Sarah Herlihy Worrying About Article II?
Contrairimairi has forwarded a post from Insight Analytical concerning Sarah Herlihy’s article that was also discussed in the blog Count us Out. Someone had forwarded Herlihy’s article to me and I blogged it on November 29. Herlihy works for the law firm of Kirkland and Ellis out of their Chicago office. The kicker is that Herlihy’s article was published in the Kent Law review in 2006 and, notes Count us Out Blogger Creative Ogre:
“While digging my way through the Internet last night, I came across the following paper, written by SARAH P. HERLIHY. It’s title: AMENDING THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT: GLOBALIZATION AS THE IMPETUS AND THE OBSTACLE caught my eye, and had to read it…
“I had to ask myself, what would drive any American to want to change a clause in a document that is the very foundation of our government? So, I kept digging, and found that SARAH P. HERLIHY is employed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP
“Noting that this law firm is based in Chicago, the light bulb was shining a little brighter . Upon looking at the firm, and the partners, I found that Bruce I. Ettelson, P.C., is Member of finance committees of U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.
“In addition, Jack S. Levin, P.C., another partner who, in December 2002 was presented the ” Illinois Venture Capital As sociation’s lifetime achievement award for service to the private equity/venture capital community” presented by Sen. Barack Obama
“So it sure looks like Obama’s people have looked into the matter of “Natural born” as far back as early 2006. What is even more disturbing is that it would appear that they are following the thought of “If the facts do not support the theory, Destroy the facts!”
Here is the introduction to the paper… It looks like a road map for Obama’s defense lawyers…And a precursor to a Socialist world.”
http://mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com/2008/12/was-sarah-herlihy-plant.html
Thanks to both of you. Am up with a yellow jacket sting and with the meds would have missed it if I weren’t double pinged.
Was talking to dad the other evening. He looked over MR SMITH’s document with a magifying glass and made the remark that if it is a forgery it was done by a pro..Three signatures, a stamp, and a seal to duplicate plus getting all of the information correct is not an easy task.
Don’t miss Fred’s great posts.....Orley needs to see them.
Senate votes to deny funds to ACORN
Community agency is under fire in several voter-registration fraud cases
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32848593/ns/politics-capitol_hill/
BREAKING NEWS——Census cutting all ties to ACORN
Fox News
Posted on Saturday, September 12, 2009 8:17:19 AM by mockingbyrd
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2337619/posts?q=1&;page=1#1
I can tell you why Herlihy was worried about natural born. Her boss. McCain Justice Advisory Committee Christopher Landau - Partner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP
It is starting to become clearer and clearer. That's why McCain went soft on BHO and we would probably find a similar connection in the Hillary campaign that kept her from barking about eligibility. Talk about conspiracy....I can't wait to see them all in cuffs.
So they are divorced in ‘64 and official Hawaiian records show BHO II to be BHO Sr son. So why the adoption in ‘71? Why bother?
bump
I find it interesting that page is not found on the kent law review website. Looks like it has been scrubbed clean.
There has got to be a smoking gun somewhere.
TheArizona
What “official Hawaiian records?”
If/when Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, Senior was no longer Barry’s father. Why would Punahou School give a scholarship to an Indonesian citizen? The Dunhams had to re-Americanize Barry.
I’m only speculating because few “absolute facts” exist about Senior, Anna or Barry in the period from 1960 through 1966.
Their divorce papers of ‘64 name BHO II as their son. No need to tell anyone he was adopted in Indonesia, is there?
bump
The Herlihy paper has been cleansed from the Internet, btw.
Seizethecarp Says:
September 17, 2009 at 12:26 pm
From my prior post:
Hasn’t a window of opportunity been opened by Judge Carter for a narrow remedy to be fashioned for Keyes (the non-military plaintiff with the most likely standing) if, for instance, the 1964 Kenya certification was authenticated to have come from Obama Sr’s family files, for example from the son of Obama Sr’s third wife who lives in the US? No FRE 902(3) Kenyan authentication (such as required for the Lucas Smith BC) would then be needed, would it?
This is totally speculative, but such a showing of Obama’s non-NBC status could allow the federal court to declare Obama to be ineligible without recourse to extrajudicial quo warranto or impeachment. Any implications of such a declaration of ineligibility by Judge Carter would be outside the judiciary as required by the Constitution, wouldn’t you agree?
[Ed. I don't understand your last paragraph. Please explain.]
Assume the following: Judge Carter finds Keyes has standing which implies a federal court remedy is available. Carter orders discovery including the 1964 Kenya certification which comes back as being authentic and is acceptable as evidence under FRE. Other discovery shows Obama knew or should have known he was not NBC due to either knowing he was born in Kenya and/or his admission against interest that he was a dual citizen governed by 1948 BNA at birth. Carter orders civil monetary remedy for Keyes based on injury caused by Obama being on ballot as an ineligible candidate. Carter makes no orders respecting Obama’s status as POTUS as that is barred by the Constitution.
As you have pointed out, the political elite of both parties have collectively ignored the NBC status of both McCain and Obama because the thought they could get away with it. An informed public can change that calculation, as the collapse of healthcare takeover and Acorn demonstrate. A ruling by Judge Carter affirming discovery that Obama is not NBC, even if he dismisses the case after discovery, would inform the public to the point of demanding action, even if the federal judiciary can’t take that action, don’t you agree?
[Ed. If the Judge orders discovery, it will be a PR victory. If that's your question, you have your answer. Will there ever be any meaningful discovery? Only if that discovery favors Obama.]
Would that be a correct assessment - that discovery is our last hope?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
