Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper help: The Certificate
self | 7/29/09 | LS

Posted on 07/29/2009 8:58:42 AM PDT by LS

Freepers: in preparing for radio shows and appearances, I need some information. Yes, it's here (someplace) on FR, usually buried in a myriad of links. So I'm asking your help to get some concise and clear answers on some "birther" issues:

1) Is there a difference between a "Certificate of Live Birth" and a "Birth Certificate?" If so, what are the specific differences, and can a non-U.S. citizen obtain either or both?

2) Was, or was not, Pakistan on the State Department's "banned travel" list when Obama went there. This has been asserted and denied. Can anyone provide a list of such states from "da gubment" on the date in question?

3) In the noise and confusion, I have heard that a) the Hawaiian records were destroyed in 2001 or 2002; that b) the birth certificate exists; or c) a copy of the birth certificate exists. Which is it?

4) Is such personal information on a public figure subject to FOIA? (I know, it would take years, even if it was, but just asking).

5) What officials have claimed to have actually seen this, and would they know what to look for (if they inspected it at all?)


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: article2section1; barackobama; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; colb; imom; naturalborn; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obroma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-251 next last
To: Spunky

Lack of support would indicate that the server he post his blog on is not supporting it anymore.....He may have cancelled the account or the account could have been pulled out from under him.


141 posted on 07/29/2009 2:42:47 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
And yes, Congress makes the laws and SCOTUS interprets them.

Congress is restricted to making laws dealing with immigration and naturalization under the Constitution, as far as "natural-born citizen" status is concerned, RummyChick.

And, "interpretation" of this specific, legal term is not in the purview of SCOTUS either, barring a Constitutional Convention and Amendment.

142 posted on 07/29/2009 2:43:40 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Thanks for the information.


143 posted on 07/29/2009 2:44:18 PM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

... and “Islamofascists” have driven Leo Donofrio into hiding, lol.

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm

Lo and behold, it’s still there. Cut the web traffic generating scams.


144 posted on 07/29/2009 2:54:06 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

THis topic now has a thread of its own.. There they say he was signed up to continue account until 2010.


145 posted on 07/29/2009 2:54:07 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

google it for yourself, a...hole

this now has its own thread fortunately there are still links that work, for now


146 posted on 07/29/2009 2:57:16 PM PDT by silverleaf (If you can't be a good example, at least don't be a horrible lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2303908/posts


147 posted on 07/29/2009 2:59:32 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: LS
What's your take, though, on the Honolulu Advertiser announcement of the Obama birth? (yes, the address is screwy, but this was 1961, is hardly fabricated at the time).

There were two papers, I believe, and each had similar listings posted if not the same day within a 48 hour window. Just the announcement itself is no proof of his birth on Hawaiian soil as the legal rules in place at that time allowed for others to apply for a COLB based on a notarized statement of an out-of-state birth to a 'Hawaiian' resident.

Others have said that it is feasible that the papers archives could have both been 'washed' to insert the info. That is too far to go, when the simplest answer has not been resolved to anyone's satisfaction. Those listings are sequentially provided by the County Records department, so the paper record is a reflection of them. A better question to raise is why his document sequence is out of step with all of the others. A woman had twins the day after his birth, yet her document numbers put them ahead of Obama's.

Too many anomalies lead to only one valid conclusion - he is not qualified. Either he is an illegal alien, or he has committed gross perjury and grand theft in his college and law admissions. I see no other possible answer - based on HIS statements.

148 posted on 07/29/2009 3:02:41 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: pissant; Lucy; All

.

I exchange emails with him once in a while- the last ones being yesterday re; his ‘happy birthday’ thread. He wrote a simple message thanking me. That’s all.
I wrote him when I discovered his message, ‘There will be no more posts from me. I’m done’. He does not answer.

Something has happened here- and we need to find out WHAT. He has been receiving death threats..maybe all it took was a death threat against his children or grandchildren- or a visit from ACORN thugs. A law suit?
He mentioned something before about ‘them’ trying to shut
him down. How could anybody sue him for the content of his website? He only put in it what was reported by others daily. It was all the news in one place- a marvelous treasure trove of information. I read his ‘latest news’ daily, and used it for reference constantly!

I am just heartsick about this.
Is this the beginning? Will the Chicago thug shut us all down?

.


149 posted on 07/29/2009 3:08:43 PM PDT by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf; Beckwith
google it for yourself, a...hole

Charming, just charming.

What, pray tell, does Google have to do with anything?

I provided you with a direct link to a page on the site. It's still there. All text, all linked images ... everything.

I'm going to have to re-think my support of FReeper Beckwith's site, if you sock puppets are going to play these stupid games.

150 posted on 07/29/2009 3:09:59 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

Well, well. Imagine finding you up in the middle of this. What, posting the same spam links for Plains Radio over and over not working out or something?


151 posted on 07/29/2009 3:12:29 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Damn, why didn’t you tell Thomas Jefferson and John Adams who drafted the Naturalization Act of 1790 . Oops.

Oh well, and forget about legislative interpretation...OOPS...

I guess no one can define natural born citizen.


152 posted on 07/29/2009 3:13:55 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: LS

The Obamas never lived at the address listed in the newspaper announcement.


153 posted on 07/29/2009 3:16:18 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Damn, why didn’t you tell Thomas Jefferson and John Adams who drafted the Naturalization Act of 1790 . Oops.

No need. It was taken care of in 1795. I'm going to be charitable and presume you knew that, but perhaps not.

Is the notion that a Constitutional Convention is required, in order to amend the Constitution itself, alien to you or something? Seems so. And, that's surprising, since you so love to deliberately misconstrue the 14th Amendment like so many other citizens of the world.

154 posted on 07/29/2009 3:17:43 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

WOW..you mean Thomas Jefferson and John Adams just didn’t know the law, eh? Hmmmmm.... I wonder if any of those signers of the Constitution were involved with that 1790 law.
Pish Posh...a bunch of numbskulls.


155 posted on 07/29/2009 3:23:10 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Oh my...

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution/

” None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention”

You don’t quite know all that you think you know. You wouldn’t happen to be that Mario lawyer, eh?


156 posted on 07/29/2009 3:25:16 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

They moved into further accord with Vattel, RummyChick.

Why is this so difficult for you? It seems you’re too caught up in some purported Kenyan marriage to see the clear implications of history upon any meaning of the term “natural-born citizen.”

And just where is your evidence of any marriage other than to Stanley Ann Dunham, for Barack Obama, Sr.? Obama’s book doesn’t count.


157 posted on 07/29/2009 3:28:23 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Wong certainly didn’t.

Is your name Mario?

How is it that you failed to know that an amendment can be passed without a Constitutional Convention?

If you want to claim that Obama was not married to Kenzia..go right ahead. Pretty foolish..but then so are some of your other notions - LIKE NO AMENDMENT CAN BE PASSED WITHOUT A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION...
oh and that those passing that 1790 law didn’t know what they were doing. Poor Thomas Jefferson..isn’t that the same bloke that wrote the Declaration of Independence?
He must have been a real numbskull.


158 posted on 07/29/2009 3:39:32 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

There are specific difficulties in amending Article I of the Constitution under the terms of Article V, Rummychick.

Would you care to discuss the 20th and 25th Amendments?


159 posted on 07/29/2009 3:55:22 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Wong certainly didn’t.

Show me where the specific, technical, legal term of art "natural-born citizen" was recognized as applicable to Ms. Wong, and I might begin to see your point.

160 posted on 07/29/2009 3:57:30 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-251 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson