Posted on 04/14/2009 8:36:29 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Dinosaur herd buried in Noahs Flood in Inner Mongolia, China
by Tas Walker Published: 14 April 2009
An international team of scientists have uncovered graphic evidence of the deadly terror unleashed on a herd of dinosaurs as they were buried under sediment by the rising waters of Noahs Flood in western Inner Mongolia (figure 1).[1]
Dinosaur bones were first discovered at the site, located at the base of a small hill in the Gobi Desert, in 1978 by a Chinese geologist. After about 20 years, a team of Chinese and Japanese scientists recovered the first skeletons, which they named Sinornithomimus, meaning Chinese bird mimic.
A few years later in 2001, the international team excavated the remains of more than 25 dinosaurs, creating a large quarry in the process as they as they followed the skeletons into the base of the hill. Remarkable excavation
As the team carefully mapped the location of the bones and strata that contained them (figure 2), it became clear that the dinosaurs were all within the same layer of mudstone (i.e. the same bedding plane), generally facing the same direction and remarkably well preserved.[2]...
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
Well, if that makes sense to you then, alrighty!
Have at.
Well it was not a they that did the 'tracing', it was by design, because of what had already took place in the previous heaven/earth age. It is written that the remembrance of what took place back then is not given to us as we pass through this flesh age. However, the evidence abounds there was 'life' upon this earth prior to this flesh age that humans walk in flesh bodies.
When Europeans came to the Americas, why did 90 percent of the Native Americans die of European diseases but not many Europeans died of American diseases?
You do not believe that Mary is the mother of Jesus?
... What? Stay tuned? Is this a miniseries, lol? Cut and paste error?
Mary was clearly a good woman, chosen by God, who featured prominently in the virgin birth, being that virgin. Beyond that, she has no religious role in Christianity. Point out the Biblical passages that support such a belief.
Not meant to be offensive... I understand the potential for objection I just don’t think the arguments are related in this case. The theory you present concerning the “evil, soulless hybrids” is interesting no doubt. of course evidence either way is lacking and I’m not familiar with the Biblical support of any animal possessing a soul. Food for thought, though.
Probably more evidence for your final point than is ever discussed in scientific circles, no doubt. I do believe that dinosaur prints and bones have been found in the same strata with human prints and evidence of human activity, I just don’t have the supporting evidence. Let me know if you have any references... that would interest me. Thanks for the reply.
I know I’d be walking along in some dino-herd... it would be fun!
K. I’ll take that under advisement, have my attorney look it over and get the signed copies back over to you by the end of the week.
Gordon Greene
P.S. If I figure out how that little exchange has anything to do with belly buttons, I’ll get back with you. Thanks for the lesson in Catholicism though. It was fun!
I believe in micro evolution like combining a poodle with a labrador to get a labradoodle. They stay in the same species. A labradoodle is still a dog just like its parents were. Macro evolution like what Darwin claimed, on the other hand, goes to an extreme.
The fossil record does indicate creation. Why have no missing links been found? Also, why do all the fossil records indicate extreme catastrophic events instead of slow evolution. The 5 large extinctions occurred due to catastrophic events. In the Cambrian Explosion, fossils have been found that show groups of complicated phyla that had never before been seen in the fossil record.
I believe we could argue our points all day and night, and it has been a pleasure. I have the belief that neither of us are going to change each others minds. The best option may be to agree to disagree.
Thanks for the link! I have not personally researched the topic in depth and I did admit that! It’s on the to-do list!
The Hebrew word used in Genesis 1 is “yom.” This word has two meanings: a 24-hour period or longer periods of time. The word here is translated as a 24 hour period because there is no other indication in the text that it means longer. For example, it means longer periods of time in Psalm 90:4 where it says a day is like a thousand years to the Lord. There is an indication though that it means longer.
>Mary was clearly a good woman, chosen by God, who featured prominently in the virgin birth, being that virgin. Beyond that, she has no religious role in Christianity.<
Apparently you slept through the first day of biology and skipped the rest of the classes.
“You do not believe that Mary is the mother of Jesus?”
Just read you’re Catholicism 101 update. I’m not interested in circular debate or false accusations based on your warping of general context. Use someone else to promote your twisted RC agenda... I’m out on this one.
If you want to have an honest discussion with the cards on the table give me a heads up. That is, if you’re capable.
Because every time a new fossil is found the Creationist say that it isn’t a *missing link* because the fossils on either side haven’t been found yet.
No offense taken.
There are several references to living creatures other than mankind having a soul. The Bible is clear that God made a covenant with them; they praise Him and obey; and, they were subjected to corruption and death through no fault of their own. You’ll find comments from me on any number of pet loss condolence threads here on FR, outlining these passages, most eloquently in Romans, but also in Chronicles, Job and others.
How's it feel to get some education?
I actually was at the top of my class...
In regards to the fact that only creationists argue they aren’t missing links, let’s look at just the ones that have been said were the human/ape “missing link.”
Piltdown Man (England, 1912)—This skull was from an ape and jaw of a human. In the 1920’s, they were found to have been purposefully scraped with a wire brush to be made to look old.
Nebraska Man (US, 1922)—In the late 1920’s, they found it was a pig’s tooth that was discovered
Australopithecus or “Lucy”—Is 100% ape.
Neanderthal—Is 100% human.
I learned all that from my biology class and it was in public school too!
It would be great if I had indeed “gotten” some education. Sadly I am left with nothing but propoganda to ponder. Let me know if you come across some educational material. I’d love to see it.
I visited your link, and followed each footnote referencing Mary to Biblical passages, and find no Biblical support for specific, special religious veneration of her. If there are more compelling passages, please direct me to them. Otherwise, I see nothing other than an edict of the Vatican, espousing the particular beliefs of the Catholic church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.