Skip to comments.
Declining Defense - Obama's budget does cut one federal department.
Wall Street Journal ^
| 3/2/09
| WSJ
Posted on 03/02/2009 10:41:55 AM PST by Gabrial
For all of his lavish new spending plans, President Obama is making one major exception: defense.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; antiamericanism; bho44; bhobudget; bhodod; bhogwot; budget; cheeseeating; cicobama; citizenoftheworld; cutbacks; defense; defensespending; enemywithin; obama; surrendermonkey; traitor; treason; weakling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Obama is planning on significantly weakening the defense of our nation. Surprise.
1
posted on
03/02/2009 10:41:55 AM PST
by
Gabrial
To: Gabrial
During the campaign he promised to spend nothing on new weapons research.
2
posted on
03/02/2009 10:46:33 AM PST
by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: Gabrial
There are certain campaign promises we knew he’d keep.
3
posted on
03/02/2009 10:50:47 AM PST
by
edpc
(01010111 01010100 01000110 00111111)
To: Gabrial
Obama is an empty mindless spector
To: Gabrial
Same with Clinton. Shall we expect a 40% cut?
5
posted on
03/02/2009 10:52:12 AM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: Gabrial
Keynesian economics will not get you out of a Great Depression. The thing that gets your economy moving is the Really Big War that comes along a few years later.
And Obama The Brilliant wants to cut back on military spending?? Now??
6
posted on
03/02/2009 10:52:47 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(American Revolution II -- overdue)
To: Gabrial
Oh my. It’s more of what BO does. If he doesn’t like it don’t fund it, bankrupt it, and drive it out of business, including our military.
7
posted on
03/02/2009 10:52:55 AM PST
by
jackv
(Just shakin' my head!!)
To: Gabrial
Obama is planning on significantly weakening the defense of our nation. He needs the money to pay for his private KGB, block captains and Red Guard Civilian National Security Force.
.
8
posted on
03/02/2009 10:55:06 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
(Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
To: Gabrial
9
posted on
03/02/2009 10:56:56 AM PST
by
Lucky9teen
(The seed of revolution is repression. ~ Woodrow Wilson)
To: Gabrial
He has already violated the Presidential Oath of Office. He promised to “defend” the Constitution. He has done no such thing. In order to defend the Constitution he has to maintain a realistic “defense” of the nation. His budget does no such thing. He is in total violation of the Presidential Oath of Office. It was never delivered in good faith.
To: Veto!
It won’t matter soon;
Dow 6,817 -245.63
Nasdaq 1,331 -46.99
11
posted on
03/02/2009 10:59:57 AM PST
by
jessduntno
(Barack - Kenyan for "high winds, dark clouds, big thunder, no rain.")
To: jackv
Just the beginning. Next year, after he’s pushed the economy even further into the crapper, he’ll claim that it is “necessary” to cut defense even further to “stayed focused on important economic issues.”
He’s working hard to bankrupt this country and disassemble our military.
BTW, the rifle I bought last year for $1200 is now a minimum of $1700+ on gunbroker.com. Get ‘em while you can, boys!
12
posted on
03/02/2009 11:00:16 AM PST
by
bolobaby
To: Gabrial
Yeah. Surprise, surprise.
13
posted on
03/02/2009 11:00:50 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
To: ClearCase_guy
“Keynesian economics will not get you out of a Great Depression. The thing that gets your economy moving is the Really Big War...”
Not if its a civil war...
14
posted on
03/02/2009 11:01:11 AM PST
by
jessduntno
(Barack - Kenyan for "high winds, dark clouds, big thunder, no rain.")
To: Gabrial
Typically defense has been the quickest way to inject new money into the economy because there are outlets for it all over the country. Whichever area is hit hardest, all they have to do is ramp up a project in that area.
Proving once again that he either doesn’t get it, or he does and is trying to rip the economy to shreds while putting up the pretense of trying to save it.
15
posted on
03/02/2009 11:01:37 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(Obama had to destroy the economy in order to save it.)
To: Iron Munro; Gabrial; My Favorite Headache; Slings and Arrows; martin_fierro; MeekOneGOP; ...
16
posted on
03/02/2009 11:05:14 AM PST
by
Lady Jag
(Believe in your heart that you're destined to do great things)
To: Gabrial
Ronald Reagan spent Soviet Union into oblivion. Obama plans on doing the same to the United States of America.
17
posted on
03/02/2009 11:05:52 AM PST
by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: Lucky9teen
18
posted on
03/02/2009 11:05:59 AM PST
by
IrishPennant
("We're surrounded...That simplifies our problem.")
To: SlowBoat407
“rip the economy to shreds”
A war on prosperity while reducing defense capability.
No country on earth could harm the United States as much as Obama is currently doing.
19
posted on
03/02/2009 11:06:28 AM PST
by
Gabrial
( Obama Lied - The Economy Died)
To: Gabrial
So true....without a shot being fired....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson