Posted on 09/15/2008 2:03:51 AM PDT by Enchante
WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.
According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.
"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.
Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Nancy Pelosi told him it was okay. After all, she tried something similar.
It's on Drudge.
This story is viral. One of the local MSP talkies, KTLK-FM is breaking it now and linking it.
Call the elderly folks you know that are without computers. I just did. This might have “big” legs. (Fingers crossed)
The media should report it, and make a big deal about it, because you know if McCain was accused of something like this they’d be all over it.
This is potentially huge...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2082723/posts
Bush’s Lonely Decision
WSJ ^ | September 15, 2008
Posted on Monday, September 15, 2008 8:21:32 AM by nuconvert
Bush’s Lonely Decision
September 15, 2008
Now that even Barack Obama has acknowledged that President Bush’s surge in Iraq has “succeeded beyond our wildest dreams,” maybe it’s time the Democratic nominee gives some thought to how that success actually came about — not just in Ramadi and Baghdad, but in the bureaucratic Beltway infighting out of which the decision to surge emerged.
excerpt
Consider what confronted Mr. Bush in 2006. Following a February attack on a Shiite shrine in the city of Samarra, Iraq’s sectarian violence began a steep upward spiral.
excerpt
The “Sunni Awakening” of tribal sheiks against al Qaeda was nowhere in sight. An attempt at a minisurge of U.S. and Iraqi forces in Baghdad failed dismally. George Casey, the American commander in Iraq, believed the only way the U.S. could “win” was to “draw down” — a view shared up the chain of command, including Centcom Commander John Abizaid and then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
Politically, the war had become deeply unpopular in an election year that would wipe out Republican majorities in Congress. The bipartisan Iraq Study Group, run by James Baker and Lee Hamilton, was gearing up to offer the President the option of a politically graceful defeat, dressed up as a regional “diplomatic offensive.”
excerpt
Handed this menu of defeat, Mr. Bush played opposite to stereotype by firing Mr. Rumsfeld and seeking advice from a wider cast of advisers, particularly retired Army General Jack Keane and scholar Fred Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute. The President also pressed the fundamental question of how the war could actually be won, a consideration that seemed to elude most senior members of his government.
Idiot...traitors of America and our troops.
If true, that was an issue he should have dealt with using the US polital system - NOT by pressuring the Iraq government to reject Bush's proposals.
Let's hope this Obama-Iraq story has legs, but I won't hold my breath. Not much is happening on the "McCain can't use a keyboard" story, that I believe "broke" on Friday afternoon:
Wondering No More - (McCain) can't use a keyboard because of torture in Nam
Karl Rove mentioned this briefly on Fox News Sunday, but Obama seems to be Teflon, and is getting away with it...
The problem is that liberals do not have any morals and they aren’t accountable. Obama’s going behind the back of the President isn’t really HIS fault.
The reason it would be a story if McCain did this is because, historically, conservatives and Republicans have shown some adherence and rhetoric to promote themselves as actually having morals.
Its impossible for liberals to do anything wrong because of this. See...it’s not too hard to see why this won’t be covered by the MSM. Time to move on...nothing to see here...
Yes, and it's driving me insane! :-(
FR seems to have been slow / having problems since the democRATic convention... I'm outta here.
Every Christian should be offended by this cynical and false analogy.
No, the claims were made after January 20, 1981... up to that point the left had no reason to believe the hostages would be released at all. The claims were ginned up to be used in a later election.
Was that your Over.? I could not recall exactly who I saw it from but it sure is a good one and fit the picture so well.
Have a nice day!
Thanks for the ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.