Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Working classes are less intelligent, says evolution expert

Posted on 05/22/2008 3:07:07 PM PDT by GourmetDan

WORKING-CLASS students have lower IQs than those from wealthier backgrounds and should not be expected to win places at top universities, an academic has claimed. Bruce Charlton, an evolutionary psychiatrist at Newcastle University, has written a paper asserting the reason why fewer students from poor families are admitted to Oxford or Cambridge is not because of social prejudice, but lack of ability.

He suggests that low numbers of working-class students at elite universities is the "natural outcome" of "substantial" IQ differences between classes.... His claims could trigger an outcry similar to that faced by the Nobel prize-winning geneticist James Watson, who was forced to apologise after claiming that African and Caribbean workers were "demonstrably less able" than white ones.

However, Dr Charlton argues it is precisely the fear of creating controversy that prevents other academics taking the same line.

He said: "That is why such obvious scientific truths have not so far been stated clearly, or have actually been denied.

"(This theory is] accepted among those who know and understand the research."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: academia; creation; evolution; iq; missinglink; philosophy; science; writtenbyemilypykett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-144 next last
To: allmendream
"No YOU apparently believe this. I am a Scientist in Biology (a “evolutionist” to those ignorant and fearful of Science) and I have yet to be convinced by the data."

I showed you multiple times that Dr. Charlon believes this. Here it is again.

"He said: "That is why such obvious scientific truths have not so far been stated clearly, or have actually been denied."

According to Dr. Charlton, you are in the denier camp. If that infuriates you, take it up w/ him.

61 posted on 05/22/2008 3:59:51 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Sorry.


62 posted on 05/22/2008 4:01:21 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
Horse feathers! I work with PhDs from China, Bangladesh, and other 3rd world places who grew up in mud huts and they are the brightest of the brightest and went to top U.S. schools.
63 posted on 05/22/2008 4:05:02 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Rehash. This was presented last year.


64 posted on 05/22/2008 4:06:29 PM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
I think I know and understand Biology better than this psychiatrist who claims to be (but seems to have no education as) an evolutionary biologist.

It is obvious that Dr. C believes this, what is not so obvious is your contention that all “evolutionists” believe this.

How could Dr. C control for environmental factors when environmental differences (low class/ upper class) was the entire basis for the grouping in this study?

Yet another Brit blue blood who cannot STAND the fact that their greatest author (William Shakespeare) their greatest Scientist (Michael Faraday) and their greatest warrior (William the Marshal)were all commoners. He now seeks “Scientific” justification for his beliefs, but being a Psychologist, probably doesn't understand even the basics of conducting a Scientific study. Correlation is not causality. Biologically there is no such thing as a “Lower class”.

The end result of what he is saying is “Smart people make more money.” as well as “Educated people with access to wealth power and good schools raise children who end usually end up educated wealthy and powerful.”

65 posted on 05/22/2008 4:08:03 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Sorry.


66 posted on 05/22/2008 4:08:50 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr; GourmetDan
since Democrats market themselves as “The Party Of The Working Class®,” doesn’t this study mean that they’re the party of dumb people?

That is precisely what liberals think, which is why they want to set up a system where they, as the intellectual superiors, will make all the decisions.

The Center for Public Intellectuals & The University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC)
April 19th-20th, 2002, Conference

[Participants include: William/Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Sen Barack Obama]

April 19th-20th, 2002
Chicago Illini Union
828 S. Wolcott

This conference is part of the Center's mission of helping to create a more engaged civil society, working towards social change, fostering coalitions between theorists and activists, and combating anti-intellectualism in contemporary culture. It will be both a celebration of ideas and a rigorous examination of the roles and responsibilities that intellectuals play in society.

I. Why Do Ideas Matter? (a keynote panel)

We introduce the “meta” theme of the conference by hearing “success stories” from diverse voices discussing their experiences intervening intellectually.

Timuel Black, Chicago activist; Prof. Emeritus, City Colleges of Chicago
Lonnie Bunch, President, Chicago Historical Society
Bernardine Dohrn, Northwestern University Law School, Children and Family Justice Center
Gerald Graff, UIC, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Richard Rorty, Stanford University, Philosophy

III. Lunch and Public Encounters

Alternative breakout tours led by Chicago activists. Tours of Bronzeville and other communities, and visits to organizations that are working on partnering theorists with activists.

IV. Intellectuals in Times of Crisis
Experiences and applications of intellectual work in urgent situations.

William Ayers, UIC, College of Education; author of Fugitive Days
Douglass Cassel, Northwestern University, Center for International Human Rights
Cathy Cohen, University of Chicago, Political Science
Salim Muwakkil, Chicago Tribune; In These Times
Barack Obama, Illinois State Senator
Barbara Ransby, UIC, African-American Studies (moderator)

The Center for Public Intellectuals
University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC):
http://www.uic.edu/classes/las/las400/conferencealt.htm

Bill Ayers, TODAY, April 6, 2008, from his own red communist star-headed website, begging to debate communism vs capitalism with Sean Hannity and STILL calling for revolution!...

"Imperialism. I’m against it, and if Sean Hannity and others were honest, this is the ground they would fight me on. Capitalism played its role historically and is exhausted as a force for progress: built on exploitation, theft, conquest, war, and racism, capitalism and imperialism must be defeated and a world revolution—a revolution against war and racism and materialism, a revolution based on human solidarity and love, cooperation and the common good —must win.

We begin by releasing our most hopeful dreams and our most radical imaginations: a better world is both possible and necessary.

Source: http://billayers.wordpress.com/2008/04/page/2/

67 posted on 05/22/2008 4:09:43 PM PDT by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Bunk
I’ve met more than one child of the wealthy who wasn’t to bright but managed to do quite well for themselves and I worked for a guy that became a millionaire from pure hard work an innate ability to delegate and complete lack of ethics and morals


68 posted on 05/22/2008 4:09:47 PM PDT by grjr21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
"I think I know and understand Biology better than this psychiatrist who claims to be (but seems to have no education as) an evolutionary biologist."

Well obviously you think so, but he made some statements about what evolutionists believe and either don't say or just deny. You're denying it, which is what he said evolutionists did.

Don't freak-out, dude.

69 posted on 05/22/2008 4:13:42 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ETL
"That is precisely what liberals think, which is why they want to set up a system where they, as the intellectual superiors, will make all the decisions."

Well, it seems to be pretty effective at maintaining liberal status and wealth.

70 posted on 05/22/2008 4:15:03 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

I beg to differ, the working class, well, that eliminates Obama supporters because they don’t work, know crap when they see it. Thats why they hate McCain and Obama.

Have we done a time travel backwards? How ‘bout the working class quit working and dump it into the laps of the elites?

They may think they are smart, they are not smart enough to work hard. What they fear most is the working class rising up against them. That is why illegals, socialist healtcare and all the things liberal are what they are peddling. Global socialists know if they toss out a free crumb here and there, the chances are slimmer that people will rise up and kick their selfish behinds to the curb. They are on borrowed time. The thought about their fate makes me tingle with pleasure.


71 posted on 05/22/2008 4:18:06 PM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
I don't believe it. He may say it, you may repeat it, but I have yet to see data that is convincing, that doesn't confuse cause and effect, or that properly controls for environment. Stating this is hardly a “freak-out”; you are saying I (and others)believe something that I (and presumably many others)do not.

Are you a mind reader?

72 posted on 05/22/2008 4:18:47 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: x

Young Ones? I know this pic from somewhere!


73 posted on 05/22/2008 4:18:56 PM PDT by WakeUpAndVote (Huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan
If there were a single gene, or a relatively small set of genes that determined overall intelligence, this theory might make sense. However, that does not appear to be the case and, as a result, smart people sometimes have stupid kids and stupid people some times have smart kids. Children of smart parents will have an edge in terms of environmental factors, because they will most likely be exposed to more intellectually stimulating things than the kids of stupid people, not to mention they probably receive better physical and nutritional care (although not guaranteed), and they will have greater expectations put on them, but it is no guarantee that they will actually be smart.

Most likely, those smart kids who are born into poverty end up succeeding in one way or another, and thus move out of the "working class" category.

One ironic thing about the term "working class": it is used in the US quite often as a substitute for "poor", but an unhealthy percentage of our poor people do not actually work.
74 posted on 05/22/2008 4:23:39 PM PDT by fr_freak (So foul a sky clears not without a storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

I’ve always been told that there is no difference if one is born smart and that the only difference is in the quality of education. Being smart and being educated are two totally different things and you can be very educated without being smart.


75 posted on 05/22/2008 4:26:28 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

And if I remember a central tenet of the Bell Curve correctly, smart people by and large marry other smart people, so this divide in intellectual capability is only increasing over time.


76 posted on 05/22/2008 4:27:16 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
I agree with everything you said.

I am afraid that Dr. Charlston would group me as “Upper Class” based upon my income and education and then say that “evolutionarily” I come from superior “Upper Class” genetics. I however was one of those born into poverty who ended up succeeding and thus moving out of the “working class” category. Neither do I consider myself an aberration from my very intelligent “working class” family.

How do these classist blue blood bigots explain that the greatest Scientist (Faraday), Writer (Shakespeare), and Warrior (William the Marshall); all came from “working class” people, while their Crown Prince is a big eared buffoon in love with a horse.

77 posted on 05/22/2008 4:29:41 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak

Yes, but it is hard to dispute that on average smart parents are more likely to have smart children outside of considering whatever sociocultural (’nurture’) advantages they may give their on average smarter-than-average kids.


78 posted on 05/22/2008 4:31:59 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: chris_bdba

Some of the smartest people I know are 70-80 years old and went no further in school than the eighth grade. Some of the dumbest I know have graduated from college. Common sense can take you a long way in life.


79 posted on 05/22/2008 4:34:07 PM PDT by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

“Reeks of eugenics.”

Reeks of reality - I fixed your typo for you.

;-)


80 posted on 05/22/2008 4:35:01 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson