Replies

I don't believe it. He may say it, you may repeat it, but I have yet to see data that is convincing, that doesn't confuse cause and effect, or that properly controls for environment. Stating this is hardly a “freak-out”; you are saying I (and others)believe something that I (and presumably many others)do not.

Are you a mind reader?

I’ve always been told that there is no difference if one is born smart and that the only difference is in the quality of education. Being smart and being educated are two totally different things and you can be very educated without being smart.

"I don't believe it. He may say it, you may repeat it, but I have yet to see data that is convincing, that doesn't confuse cause and effect, or that properly controls for environment."

You are the one who misrepresented what I said and yelled at me in post 56 when all along I have said that Dr. Charlton is the one who said it. Dr. Charlton went on to say that scientists who know this will deny it. That's what you are doing. That is Dr. Charlton's position. Yell at him.

"Stating this is hardly a “freak-out”; you are saying I (and others)believe something that I (and presumably many others)do not. Are you a mind reader?"

You are misrepresenting me again. I didn't say you believed anything. Dr. Charlton is the one who said, "That is why such obvious scientific truths have not so far been stated clearly, or have actually been denied." and "(This theory is] accepted among those who know and understand the research."

You are freaking-out and projecting your opinion of Dr. Charlton onto me. He's the one who says that it is 'accepted among those who know and understand the research'. Not me.

Please stop projecting your opinions of Dr. Charlton onto me.