Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Ron Paul to make third party run on Constitution Party ticket
Modern Conservative ^ | Christopher Cook

Posted on 12/27/2007 6:02:59 AM PST by connell

ModernConservative.com has received a tip from a reliable source that may have election-shattering implications.

According to our source, an activist here in Arizona has been approached by the Ron Paul campaign; the campaign has requested that he run the Arizona effort to get Ron Paul on the general election ballot as a candidate of the Constitution Party.

Our source has requested anonymity, and we have agreed. We can, however, vouch for his/her general reliability. Our source also provided us with details that added credibility to the account. (Unfortunately, disclosure of those details would put at risk our promise of anonymity. We apologize for the unnamed sourcing and lack of further details, but those were the requirements that accompanied this revelation.)

We will keep you apprised of any new developments.

There has been a lot of analysis on the impact that Ron Paul has already had, and on the impact that he might...

(Excerpt) Read more at modernconservative.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911truther; blameamericafirst; constitutionparty; cuckooforcocoapuffs; domesticenemy; elections; endorsedbydu; gop; heeeeeeeykoolaid; moveoncadidate; nutjob; ronniethecommie; ronpaul; ronpaulisanutjob; soros; tehronpaul; thedailykoscandidate; thirdparty; truthercandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-351 next last
To: imd102

So the 100 million a year the Israeli’s estimate Saddam gave to terrorists means nothing? So Saddam publicly announcing that his nation was a safe have means nothing? So Saddam publicly encouraging the terrorists organizations he gave money to expand their target list to include America means nothing?

Sorry only a complete moron would think Iraq had nothing to do with the WOT. Saddam was involved in terrorism up to his neck, and you don’t need any CIA briefs to know it, he talked about this stuff in his public speeches. The joke is you buddy, a stupid joke at that.


201 posted on 12/27/2007 8:25:48 AM PST by discostu (a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: FroedrickVonFreepenstein
Here's a list composed by Planned Parenthood of Bush's horrible "war on women." Some of these are repeated, but notice the large number, and notice that they're all from the first term. Did Clinton I do anything like this? Will Hillary?

REDUCING ACCESS TO FAMILY PLANNING

BUILDING THE PLATFORM TO OUTLAW ABORTION

REDEFINING THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE FETUS

PACKING THE COURTS TO OVERTURN ROEREPLACING SCIENCE WITH RIGHT-WING IDEOLOGYCENSORING FREE SPEECHContacts:
202 posted on 12/27/2007 8:26:59 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Support Scouting: Raising boys to be strong men and politically incorrect at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

If this report is true, and I’m still fairly skeptical, it should make the race of Paul’s congressional seat far more interesting.

Paul hasn’t said if he’s running for re-election to his House seat, but most people think he intends to do so. The filing deadline is sometime within the next couple of weeks.

Would Paul run as a Republican for his House seat while seeking the Presidency in a different party? I don’t think that would fly in his Texas district. Already he has several announced opponents in the GOP primary.

We could be witnessing a spectacular crash and burn ending the political career of one of the strangest politicians in American history.


203 posted on 12/27/2007 8:37:23 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: connell

Well, at least he didn’t decide to sandbag my party (mainly because we wouln’t want him).


204 posted on 12/27/2007 8:38:19 AM PST by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
But such an analysis would only give credibility to your looney conspiracy theories.

Since you are getting personal without any knowledge of my supporting logic, I can logically conclude that you are just slinging mud and probably incapable of examining the facts upon which to make rational counter arguments.

205 posted on 12/27/2007 8:39:36 AM PST by ghostrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: RKV
No, it’s simply that this info is of such a nature that confirmation (i.e. other sources) is needed.

Jack Bauer is deeply saddened.......

206 posted on 12/27/2007 8:41:41 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
I'm going to rip off Antoninus' answer because I think it's pretty much spot on... "With a conservative nominee like Thompson or Hunter, Ron Paul is no threat. With a liberal nominee like Rudy or Flip, Paul hands the election to Hillary. Don't be stupid with your vote."

Feel free to rip it off as much as you want. I've been preaching this since the media made Rudy McRomney into our front-runners. It's not difficult to see that any of these three are vulnerable to a 3rd party threat from a populist conservative. Ron Paul fits the bill.

Conservatives should ignore Pied Pipers like Hugh Hewitt who are too clever by half. They will lead us to a November day which will have us scratching our heads as to how a woman with a +50% negative rating can still be elected president with 45% of the vote. The answer is: "The same way her husband did." He ran against a moderate Republican who double-crossed the party base and a crazy populist who drew away just enough votes.

The solution to the problem is: vote for a conservative like Thompson or Hunter. Then an anti-war guy like Paul only draws vote away from the Democrats.
207 posted on 12/27/2007 8:43:25 AM PST by Antoninus (Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“...You’re going to have to trust me on this one.”


208 posted on 12/27/2007 8:43:34 AM PST by big'ol_freeper ("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: ghostrider
Since you are getting personal without any knowledge of my supporting logic, I can logically conclude that you are just slinging mud and probably incapable of examining the facts upon which to make rational counter arguments.

So, you support Ron Paul because he is not a globalist, right? If not, who do you support?

209 posted on 12/27/2007 8:43:34 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: umgud
He can’t seriously believe he could win, so why do it?

From the standpoint of one who belongs to a third party, it's like this:

You've got a candidate who could possibly get you enough votes to appear on the ballot next time, something third parties are constantly struggling against. This candidate is getting no traction in his current party. Now, wouldn't it be great if he left his party and came to yours, bringing his constituents with him, thus getting you the percentage of votes you need to appear on the national ballot?
210 posted on 12/27/2007 8:43:45 AM PST by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
Will Ron Paul draw his support (votes, not financial) from libertarians and conservatives or liberals?

Paul doesn't actually have a lot of love from Libertarians, myself included. He left our party to try to build a legacy. He's a turncoat.
211 posted on 12/27/2007 8:47:02 AM PST by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Perfect Music link, Close Encounters of the Third Party kind.

During our last minute Christmas shopping events and traveling to our son and DIL’s home for Christmas, we saw a few interesting vehicles with Paul Stickers on them.

They were two types:

1. An old Volvo or Volkswagon Van with save the Whales, Peace Stickers, Green STickers, Kerry Edwards stickers, Impeach Bush stickers and Ron Paul Stickers.

2. A new luxury sedan or SUV (BMW, Merc, Lexus, Audi) with stop the war, no war for oil, impeach GW, Kerry/Edwards and Ron Paul Stickers.


212 posted on 12/27/2007 8:48:57 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

LOL. Who will ever forget that.


213 posted on 12/27/2007 8:50:58 AM PST by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"There goes the Constitution Party’s credibility."

ditto

jw

214 posted on 12/27/2007 8:51:10 AM PST by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

You may be onto something there.


215 posted on 12/27/2007 8:52:24 AM PST by norton (deep down inside you know that Fred is your second choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"He might do it in the end, but on the other hand, I’m sure that this particular story is merely a plant by anti-Paul forces, intended to weaken his support in the GOP primaries - Brilliant!"

I see that those beer commercials have worked on you.

216 posted on 12/27/2007 8:58:09 AM PST by norton (deep down inside you know that Fred is your second choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback; Southack

This is the stuff that gets me. Why does he support this crap?

Income tax cuts.... not permanent. They will expire and not get renewed. Thanks! The rest is wasting $ on big govt programs. You see the Medicare prescription drug giveaway as being good??

“Signed 2 income tax cuts \u2014\u2014 1 of which was the largest Dollar value tax cut in world history

Reduced taxes on dividends and capital gains

In process of eliminating IRS marriage penalty.

Increased small business incentives to expand and to hire new people

Signed into law the No Child Left Behind legislation delivering the most dramatic education reforms in a generation (challenging the soft bigotry of low expectations)

Reorganized the INS in an attempt to safeguard the borders and ports of America and to eliminate bureaucratic redundancies and lack of accountability.

Signed trade promotion authority

Committed US funds to purchase medicine for millions of men and women and children now suffering with AIDS in Africa

Passed Medicare Reform (authorized $39.5 Billion per year for preventive medicine such as drugs and doctor visits as well as included a ten year Privatization option)”


217 posted on 12/27/2007 9:02:22 AM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: discostu
So the 100 million a year the Israeli’s estimate Saddam gave to terrorists means nothing? So Saddam publicly announcing that his nation was a safe have means nothing? So Saddam publicly encouraging the terrorists organizations he gave money to expand their target list to include America means nothing?

Can you provide a cite to any of this other than a GW or Cheney speech or some other sheep like yourself who is quoting them?

218 posted on 12/27/2007 9:02:51 AM PST by imd102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Signed into law the No Child Left Behind legislation delivering the most dramatic education reforms in a generation (challenging the soft bigotry of low expectations)

Passed Medicare Reform (authorized $39.5 Billion per year for preventive medicine such as drugs and doctor visits as well as included a ten year Privatization option)

I can't believe people still post this stuff on conservative forums.

219 posted on 12/27/2007 9:04:55 AM PST by jmc813 (Ron Paul was on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Already he has several announced opponents in the GOP primary.

I know of Chris Peden, but wasn't aware there were others. This is going to make Peden's very-long-shot bid even tougher if there are others vying for the nomination.

220 posted on 12/27/2007 9:07:37 AM PST by jmc813 (Ron Paul was on the grassy knoll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson