Posted on 09/07/2007 8:18:27 AM PDT by april15Bendovr
Ron Paul refuses to declare war against Al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq.
We have made it clear here at Free Republic that there is irrefutable documentation showing Saddam's WMD program and links to Al Qaeda under this section on the website
PreWarDocs
Ron Paul continues to appease our enemy.
I am officially posting a declaration of war against Ron RuPaul here at Free Republic on behalf of patriotic Americans who support our troops mission in Iraq.
Ron Paul would NOT have stood up to the terrorists. Ron Paul will not win the Republican nomination. Ron Paul will not run as a third party candidate.
Ron Paul supporters that are hopping in bed with MOVEON.org and Anti-War.com had better make sure they wear flea collars and have all of their shots.
I will respect long term Freepers who support Ron Paul. The scads of newly signed up Ron Paul supporters smells of a Jihad party and Soros money.
By the way, I work for your so called “department of offense”
Thank me
Some of us are still around. We're just getting fed up with the clueless ones who like to say that Dr. Paul 'blamed' America for 9/11. They NEVER want to stop to ask themselves what lengths we might be willing to go to should, say, China come here or to maybe Mexico and build military bases or put their troops within our borders to 'keep the peace'. I can tell you pretty darned quick that there isn't much I wouldn't do to see such an 'occupation' end. I'm simply amazed that even the clueless ones can't seem to grasp the concept of blowback.
No need to apologize. ;^)
Well noted. Thats the crux of this entire matter.
There are trolls about.
LOL
ROFLMAO
ROFLMAOAPIMPRFI! Bwa ha ha ha ha haha hahahahahhha hahahah cough cough!
Stop it, you're killing me.
...continues to occupy 182 countries that are illegally there...
Why would we occupy so many countries that are illegally there? WTF does that even mean?
...since Congress did not declare war.
Neither you nor Lord Paul have a clue what that phrase means.
Thank you.
Unless he is not going to allow any immigration whatsoever, he won't be stopping terrorists from coming into the U.S. (And we both know he isn't going to do that.)
His stand on handling the terrorists 'over there' before they can come here is unacceptable to me.
I could never support a candidate whose followers claim we went into Iraq for oil, that the U.S. perpetrated 9/11, that CFR is about installing a one-world government, and who gather followers from the likes of Code Pink and Moveon.org.
Any time.
It’s nice that you post websites that cite places like prisonplanet as a reliable source. Just don’t expect others to take it seriously.
And the links you posted still don’t show that Paul said the things you attributed to him further up the thread.
Those weren’t his quotes and it is dishonest to continue passing them off as his quotes. But that’s becoming standard fare for those who continually feel compelled to attack the “inconsequential” Ron Paul.
So you’re a big fan of the CFR?
Let me summarize your argument for you...
Whaaaaaahhh! I don’t want to hear intelligent debate. Anybody who disagrees with me should be sent to a Gulag.
Put there by 'Rats and The Stupid Party, depending on who is in power.
Ron Paul is right, Freepers no longer support the republic. How sad.
You can GTH! Paul is putting himself out on the limb. After watching him on the debate 2 nights ago, I came to the conclusion that,
1)He's not just your whackjob Uncle, and
2) He is not fit to be the President.
BTW pal, I support Tancredo. No more big Gubbermint and build the damn fence!
I agree Paul is a fringe type but outright declaring war? You need 2 to tango and Paul is just not the fighting type.
Paul is relief.. a chance to post some jokes about the Libs.
I agree with your assessment (at least today), but am holding out hope that Tancredo will be able to pull off a miracle win. He is a true blue conservative, even if Republicans no longer are.
I've seen some uncomplimentary comments on various Paul forums about Freerepublic, but did Ron Paul say that?
Yes, in a manner of speaking. This time his name is Ron Paul.
Do you have any proof of this?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.