Unless he is not going to allow any immigration whatsoever, he won't be stopping terrorists from coming into the U.S. (And we both know he isn't going to do that.)
His stand on handling the terrorists 'over there' before they can come here is unacceptable to me.
I could never support a candidate whose followers claim we went into Iraq for oil, that the U.S. perpetrated 9/11, that CFR is about installing a one-world government, and who gather followers from the likes of Code Pink and Moveon.org.
So you’re a big fan of the CFR?
No terrorists are going to attack America directly again, if they know what's good for them, regardless who's President.
His stand on handling the terrorists 'over there' before they can come here is unacceptable to me.
His stand is perfectly reasonable. Secure America's borders and rebuild the military and let these heathens kill each other over religious discrepancies. I don't care about the Middle East, do you?
I could never support a candidate whose followers claim we went into Iraq for oil, that the U.S. perpetrated 9/11, that CFR is about installing a one-world government, and who gather followers from the likes of Code Pink and Moveon.org.
And that means Dr. Paul supports the views of a few nutjobs who are trying to exploit his campaign? Please stop with the guilt-by-association tactics.