Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bombing Islamic sites an option: US presidential hopeful-(nuclear attack against US soil "imminent")
thenews ^ | 8/3/07 | the news

Posted on 08/02/2007 6:30:59 PM PDT by Flavius

WASHINGTON: Republican presidential hopeful Tom Tancredo says the best way he can think of to deter a nuclear terrorist attack on the US is to threaten to retaliate by bombing Islamic holy sites.

The Colorado congressman on Tuesday told about 30 people at a town hall meeting in the state of Iowa that he believes such a terrorist attack could be imminent and that the US needs to hurry up and think of a way to stop it.

“If it is up to me, we are going to explain that an attack on this homeland of that nature would be followed by an attack on the holy sites in Mecca and Medina,” Tancredo said at the Family Table restaurant.

“Because that’s the only thing I can think of that might deter somebody from doing what they otherwise might do,” Tancredo said in comments recorded and posted on the Web site iowapolitics.com.

A Washington-based Islamic civil rights and advocacy group responded in anger on Thursday, calling Tancredo’s statement “unworthy of anyone seeking public office in the United States.” “Perhaps it’s evidence of a long-shot candidate grasping at straws and trying to create some kind of a controversy that might appeal to a niche audience of anti-Muslim bigots,” said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenews.com.pk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cair; crushislam; genociderus; idiots; islam; islamicterrorists; jihadinamerica; muslims; nukemecca; tancredo; terrorism; thenews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: Reverend Bob

You say that likes it’s a bad thing.


121 posted on 08/04/2007 6:29:40 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

btt


122 posted on 08/04/2007 6:32:23 PM PDT by Scarchin (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Sounds reasonable to me. Pres Truman ordered Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuked and that was the right decision to make.

If NYCity, Chicago or Colorado Springs were nuked or dirty bombed by terrorists, I would expect the POTUS to retaliate. In that regard, Tom Tancredo is talking about making what is, the right decision. Nothing wrong giving an ultimatum to your enemy. The Islamic world lives under rules based on holy edict from Mohammad. We Americans have our own set of rules based on freedom and liberty.

The enemies of freedom and liberty must understand. Attack America and you will pay the consequences.

123 posted on 08/04/2007 6:43:26 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
>>>>Reason #37,209 why Tom Tancredo should never be allowed anywhere near the reins of power. He might not be a clueless idiot, but he does a very good impersonation of one.

Since you support the abortionist liberal RINO, Rudy Giuklinai for POTUS, I would advise FReepers not take your opinion as serious.

Tancredo is on the right about this issue. You are the clueless one.

124 posted on 08/04/2007 6:48:44 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Since you support the abortionist liberal RINO, Rudy Giuklinai

Who says I support him?
“I support the rightward most viable candidate.”
WF Buckley


125 posted on 08/04/2007 6:57:45 PM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Valin
So, that wasn't you on that pro-Giuliani thread within the last hour, talking up Rooty Toot? LOL

Oh, come one now. There is only one Valin I know of on FR. Btw, if you didn't notice that pro-Giuliani thread was pulled for promoting an abortionist for POTUS, who happened to have the last name of, Giuliani.

126 posted on 08/04/2007 7:25:43 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow

Our forefathers took up arms over much less. We’ve been sadly conditioned to be soft, pliable, and easily influenced. Our children are taught in public schools that America is bad, God is dead, guns are evil, we’re descended from monkey droppings, and that surrender is the best option. And we wonder why we have no collective nerve?

All the while, we’re distracted by on-demand entertainment garbage, satisfying every greedy whim we can muster. Lulled to sleep by ones in partnership with those who have sworn to destroy us.

= = =

More excellent points, in my view. Thanks.


127 posted on 08/04/2007 8:27:29 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: shield

Thanks.

So, does it qualify as black humor?


128 posted on 08/04/2007 8:31:08 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Malsua

Lots of people agree with you.

We shall see who’s hypothesis covers the most data points in the future.


129 posted on 08/04/2007 8:32:53 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Quix

LOL...I don’t know what black humor is...


130 posted on 08/04/2007 8:56:58 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Please see post #79 to this thread for my response.


131 posted on 08/04/2007 10:29:33 PM PDT by GravityFree (Death is not the end, nor the beginning of the end, but only the end of the beginning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: bfree

Ditto. It’s gonna happen eventually imo and I hope we’re the ones that initiate it. I sincerely hope we’re not the ones who suffer astronomical casualties after the fact.


132 posted on 08/04/2007 10:32:22 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

ITA. I don’t think the USA will do it though.


133 posted on 08/04/2007 10:33:19 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow

I don’t think we do either. And that worries me. I think it will eventually come down to individual fights so I thank God for our second amendment rights.


134 posted on 08/04/2007 10:35:33 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

True. Gabrielle something (can’t recall her last name at the moment but she’s the author of Because They Hate) also speaks out on this.

Some understand Islam and the Muslims and speak out. We find it futile most of the time. It’s an uphill battle.

Robert Spencer understands what this war is about.


135 posted on 08/04/2007 10:38:59 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
You announce that the Attack will only be stopped if Allah stays the attack, then nuke the sites. You want to introduce cognitive dissonance. You set up a “baal vs the TRUE GOD” scenario...(ie. if Allah was so powerful why did he not stop the destruction of the Kaaba stone)

Nope. First and foremost, there's a huge body of theology in all religions devoted to the subject of why bad things happen to good people. Second, Muslims don't believe that you can just walk around telling God what to do. It didn't work during the witch trials of the Middle Ages, it won't work now. Third, it can quite easily be turned on its head, e.g. "If God is so powerful why did He not stop 9/11, or the Holocaust, or the Spanish flu epidemic?"

Perhaps most important, though, and definitely most pertinent to this discussion, is that you guys are waaaaaaay overestimating the importance of the physical city of Mecca, as well as the Kaaba and the Black Stone, to Muslims. Yes, it is their most sacred city/mosque/meteoroid. That doesn't change the fact that it's just a physical object. God does not live in Mecca. You cannot kill Him by nuking Mecca.

Also, incidentally, the whole "pigs are to Muslims as garlic is to vampires" idea is ridiculous. Muslims are not supposed to eat pork. That doesn't make pork some kind of anti-Islam biological weapon, it just means that if a Muslim eats a strip of bacon, s/he has committed a minor sin.

136 posted on 08/05/2007 3:32:36 AM PDT by Sergei Andropov (Deus serva Americam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: GravityFree
The only problem I see with the example you are trying to use is that the middle east is run under a theocracy. It is high time we accept the fact that the mullahs run the countries, make the laws, and declare the wars. They have heads of state just to keep us from understanding who is really in charge. That strategy has messed with our concepts so badly we can't seem to figure out who is running things over there. It isn't the 'government' by any stretch of our imagination...it is the mosque. In my mind since that is the case it brings Mecca and Medina into the picture as fair targets. They want to bomb our 'historic places and houses of democracy' then their places of law making are fair game too. Whether we want to admit it or not, when we declare war in the middle east...we are declaring it on islam. They have made it so by placing it as the central tenant of their own governance.

Article 3

In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the sacred religion of Islam and the values of this Constitution.

Article 2

Article (2): 1st — Islam is the official religion of the state and is a basic source of legislation:

(a) No law can be passed that contradicts the undisputed rules of Islam. Iraq Constitution

137 posted on 08/05/2007 4:03:15 AM PDT by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sergei Andropov

Muslims are so invested in Allah being on their side which is why Israel is such a conundrum for them. Secondly the traditions in our country teach us that bad things do happen to good people which is why we just didn’t fold up and fall in on our-selves when 9/11 occured. In other words our religious traditions tell us that God does allow bad things to happen just as they declare that governments exist to bear the sword to bring order among evil doers. Even the Jihadist Muslims were quite taken aback by our responses to 9/11.

The Jihadist Muslim can’t accept that notion that they are on the losing side, nor can they accept the notion of a Jewish state which gives the lie to their own religion. They can’t live with internal cognitive dissonance. We of a Christian tradition might declare that an unresolved question be left in “God’s Hands”! Jews might state, “When Elijah comes, he will decide”. The Muslim extremist can’t leave the question alone, for them they must fight and conquer for only then will their outer world match their inner destorted vision, and only then will they be(they surely reason) at peace with Allah.

The book of Habbakuk might give us some guidance as to the reason for such a threat to the world. The prophet was told...”See, I am raising up the Chaldeans to be a scurge for Israel”. Israel had plunged into a time of corruption and moral degradation, the desciptions of which were not unlike our times. Our society has become morally decadent and weakened and we have lost our Christian vision. We are being ‘scurged’ and I pray we will recover our vision and repent lest these Muslims beome our masters! There is no reason for us to succomb to such monsters, we have force of arms....but if we have no national re-awakening of our moral vision, then we are lost and our corrupt leaders and educators will give up with nary a shot fired!


138 posted on 08/05/2007 11:03:56 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

“The Jihadist Muslim can’t accept that notion that they are on the losing side”

They’ve had no choice but to accept that for over a dozen centuries, ever since the assassination of Uthman, the Islamic Civil War and resulting usurpation of power by the Umayyads, and the breakup of the Caliphate. Muslims are quite used to things not going as planned, because, as with every group of people, they’ve had their fair share of hardships and failures. The end of the Islamic Golden Age was far more faith-shaking than some mere physical attack on a physical location could ever be. Indeed, it would probably be faith affirming, since it would validate, beyond so much as the least shadow of a doubt, that the West is at war with Islam, and that their decline over the last few centuries — a decline to which Salafism directly traces its roots — is the fault of some sinister external force, rather than any fault on their part.


139 posted on 08/06/2007 11:06:41 PM PDT by Sergei Andropov (Deus serva Americam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Killborn
Considering what DBrow (customary ping) said about the Qaa’ba being formed by a meteorite, its survival despite a thermonuclear strike, scientifically, is not so far-fetched.

Capt. Kirk, if unwilling to use the phasers, would have beamed the whole thing into the sun. Although much more difficult and expensive in casualties without Scotty's transporter, the end result IS technically possible today and probably would be theologically confusing. However, the rock was stolen once in the past and resided in Bahrain for 20+ years before being returned. Islam survived that. So we should be careful when contemplating what our logic says should be a decapitation attack on a religion. Their logic might not work the same way.

140 posted on 08/07/2007 6:35:21 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson