Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[Iwo Jima]

It would probably be better all the way around if you left now. We are going to have a fight on our hands about America, and it is obvious that you are not up to the task.

Good-bye, and good luck.

[Delphinium]

Why are you on the banned list?

[Eric Blair 2084]

Wow! The really hit the fan on this thread. I've never seen anything like this.

[cicero's_son]

Sure—it could happen.

I don’t really see it happening, but it could happen.

I can’t see any of these midgets dethroning Hillary.

[SeaBiscuit]

You made me laugh! :^)))

[Spiff]

Your site, but then this site should no longer be named 'Free Republic.'

Why? And what do you think it should be named now?

[onyx]

Reports of your demise are much like Mark Twain’s. I wanted you to know as well as the posters who are reposting a list, that’s incomplete anyway.

By the time the presidential primary is held in my little state, Super Tuesday will have taken place, so I doubt that my primary vote will matter, but my vote in the general election will count and I will be voting for the GOP nominee, even if my vote is more about voting against the democrat nominee.

It is unfathomable for me to even think about the likes of the Clinton’s in the WH again. Ditto for Barrack HUSSEIN Obama.

[EternalVigilance]

Well, I'd have to say, you're not digging hard enough.

Fred prefaced his acknowledgement of the conservative position by saying, "I'm not ready to go there yet."

Exactly what part of that are you misunderstanding?

[Mo1]

Give me a break. Ron Paul has been the most Constitutionally-grounded politician since the Founders themselves

Ron Paul is a loon

[LdSentinal]

Kerry polled at just 4% one month before the Iowa Caucuses? Thanks for the link.

[Blackirish]

So TX will go for Gore or Hillary over Rudy? Why would you even post something so absurd?

All polling refutes that. Show me a poll that proves otherwise.

[NapkinUser]

This thread is going one of two directions:

1. Locked or possibly pulled.

2. Recorded breaking posts thread.

[Iwo Jima]

He takes nothing.

[LdSentinal]

Spiffy Land.

[La Enchiladita]

She who knows she knows not knows a lot.

I said that...:)

[BigSkyFreeper]

The man is an abortionist. The Republican party is pro life. The man is a gay rights supporter. The Republican party is pro traditional family. The man is a gun grabber. The Republican party is pro second amendment. The man is poison to the Republican party.

Fine, if he is the nominee, which is debateable at this point, I don't care what you do, just don't vote for him then and gripe about it in some vanity on the Wednesday morning after the election one way or the other.

[Luke21]

What’s the current record?

[Torie]

I will ponder that one. To me, it means a place, that an inner being. Thanks for you kind note.

[Central Scrutiniser]

Well, winning an argument by silencing your opponent is not very classy. This is a circular firing squad and it breaks Reagan’s 11th commandment. Its sad.

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

Rudy Giuliani will NOT get the nomination.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I would hope the “baby-killin’-gun-grabbers” all go down the road...