Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House passes resolution rebuking the president on Iraq {246-182}
CNN ^ | February 16, 2007 | Unsigned

Posted on 02/16/2007 12:41:40 PM PST by .cnI redruM

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Democratic-controlled House issued a symbolic rejection of President Bush's decision to deploy more troops to Iraq on Friday, opening an an epic confrontation between Congress and commander in chief over an unpopular war that has taken the lives of more than 3,100 U.S. troops.

The vote on the nonbinding measure was 246-182.

Resolution criticized President Bush for his decision to send more troops to Iraq is a rare admonishment of a wartime commander-in-chief.

"The passage of this legislation signal a change in direction that will end the fighting and bring our troops home," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said before the vote when she endorsed the measure that takes issue with Bush's decision to send an additional 21,500 U.S. troops into battle.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 17forremoval; 17losers; 17rinos; 2008; cheeseeaters; congress; enemywithin; governmentterrorists; justlikefrance; losers; mccarthywasright; nonbindingwusses; pelosercrats; rinos; sedition; shamelesstraitors; surrenderchimps; traitors; trators; treason; two
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-293 next last
To: Jrabbit
This is EXACTLY how the Rats treated the troops in Viet Nam, and if they have their way, they will defund the war effort and put our troops in great danger.

That's why we all need to pray that these traitors don't GET their way.

We cannot let this happen again. EVER!

221 posted on 02/16/2007 3:34:23 PM PST by ohioWfan (PRAY for our President and our troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44; xzins; RedRover; SandRat; jude24; blue-duncan; Corin Stormhands
"Executive Finding of Rebuke" never heard of such a thing

Have you ever heard of a congressional finding of rebuke?

What the congress did was not only harmful to the nation but was unprecedented at a time when our troops are engaged in combat. So if the congress can get away with rebuking the president, the president can issue an executive order rebuking those congressmen who voted to demoralize our troops.

If congress is going to invent new games, then the rules for one side should also apply to the other.

222 posted on 02/16/2007 3:35:09 PM PST by P-Marlowe (What happened to my tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

The dems and their allies are despicable. They stink to high heaven. Their brash self centered egotism knows no bounds.

They are willing to undermine our heroes to score political points FGS!





223 posted on 02/16/2007 3:35:18 PM PST by eleni121 ( + En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: anglian
Thanks. I wouldn't vote for him for dog catcher

Support the Troops:
LET THEM WIN

224 posted on 02/16/2007 3:36:30 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Elections have repercussions, you reap what you sow.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

The first step in cutting off funds.

The first step in abandoning the troops.

This will be seen by the mullas as weakness, therefore it is the first step toward sitting in motion another major attack in the continental U.S.

All this was made possible by the American voters on November 7, 2006. They should be happy. I hope that they are.

I'm not, but, I voted the other way.


225 posted on 02/16/2007 3:42:47 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one! - Alexander Hamilton


226 posted on 02/16/2007 3:43:01 PM PST by batter (aka "soccer8" ~ "Better to fight for something than live for nothing" - Gen Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

The Relationship Between Fanatics and American Liberals http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1776500/posts
227 posted on 02/16/2007 3:45:07 PM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Preachin'

They are too smart to do that. They will sneak it in the back door.

But remember these people wereted by the American voters.


228 posted on 02/16/2007 3:45:41 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

I don't know why you're always so damn eager to defend Lindsey. I was perfectly aware of what his position on the resolution was. He is *my* senator, not yours.


229 posted on 02/16/2007 3:47:17 PM PST by ilovew ("Sure I am of this, that you have only to endure to conquer." --Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

quite simply Paul is willing to sacrifice this nation's security on the altar of his ideology. He even joins the blame America crowd when discussing 9-11 ...yes that bunch.

He doesn't get it on the islamic insurgence...and could care less for the morale of our troops.


230 posted on 02/16/2007 3:50:17 PM PST by eleni121 ( + En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Faith

What about Hillary and chuckie? I didn't see them there but I could just have missed them.


231 posted on 02/16/2007 3:52:04 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Faith

WHOOPS. This is the HOUSE not the SENATE. I need a drink.


232 posted on 02/16/2007 3:52:58 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
"The Republican primary opponents of those 17 will be receiving contributions from me before the next election."

That's the problem. There rarely is an opponent of an incumbent, and when there is they are not supported by the RNC.

233 posted on 02/16/2007 3:54:08 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I am really ticked off at Walsh. I've voted for him every time he's run. I hope they find a real conservative (in Syracuse???) to run against him next time. No MO!


234 posted on 02/16/2007 3:54:17 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

This is what George gets for being nice to Nancy,a kick in the teeth.


235 posted on 02/16/2007 3:57:55 PM PST by linn37 (Love your Phlebotomist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Cheers! :)

Love your tagline.

236 posted on 02/16/2007 4:05:09 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

While you're at it, how about a People's Rebuke of Congress?


237 posted on 02/16/2007 4:07:14 PM PST by RedRover (www.justinsharrat.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Borges

2


238 posted on 02/16/2007 4:12:52 PM PST by b4its2late (Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anglian
"Ron Paul has a video of himself explaining his vote on his website."

Ron Paul is a LIBERTARIAN who ran as a Republican in order to get elected. The Libertarians I know are against the war.

239 posted on 02/16/2007 4:13:47 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Faith

Thanks, Faith. It's something I need to remember from time to time, especially NOW when I want to lay hands on some of these folks--around their grimy little necks, of course (smile). Mxxx


240 posted on 02/16/2007 4:14:51 PM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson