Posted on 10/26/2006 4:36:18 PM PDT by cdnerds
Drudge Siren: ALLEN'S REVENGE: EXPOSES RIVAL'S NOVEL WRITINGS; UNDERAGE SEX SCENES
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
Why would anyone consider Webb's writing to hurt Allen? I suppose now Allen for sure will lose the votes of pedophiles and other perverts which he probably would have lost anyway.
Allen's comment, which had the MSM in hysteria, sure was mild compared to what Webb wrote.
It's pretty awe-inspiring, isn't it?
They seem to be grabbing their beebers and heading for the tall grass. Even saw some posts critical of Webb.
"Game set and match" or something like that, I suppose.
Rove you magnificent bastard!
just what i was thinking...more likely in brown's case i think
What? Get real.
This kind of thing is absolutely on the table politically! Just as the Foley thing was.
As I have said here for a long time the thing about the queer agenda has been to make sure that the physical aspects of being queer is not mentioned. It's always love and feelings and such. But when average Americans hear about penis in mouth or anal sex they don't like it. I can prove this too, just have the cast of Queer Eye for the Straight guy start toungue kissing or worse on their show. It would tank instantly.
Put a fork in Webb, he's done!
And you have been a member for - how long?
It does. And sex sells, even in elections anymore. Shouldn't that raise flags too?
Peach: Literature has gotten so sick.
Yep. Literature, politics, tv, movies, sports....I'm sure there are more examples too.
Dugway Duke....LOL! Thanks for the grins tonight!
Dog: Politics isn't called a bloodsport for no reason....its rough and tumble.
True, I know. Yet doesn't that continually lower the bar for expectations for the ones we are electing to govern us? I feel like I'm voting for gorillas at times.
okie01 : Negative campaigning is designed to suppress the other side's turnout of "leaners". That said, mud begets mud. It's been long time since the Democrats were even remotely civil. I can't blame a Republican for responding in kind.
Good point about the leaners, likely true. Since I've already voted absentee this year, I guess I'm turned off for other reasons. While the RATS are the prime instigators, I hate to see us lowering to their standard.
Fledermaus: Grow a pair.
No thanks, wrong gender. I'll remain my steadfast conservative self and continue to wish that certain things were a LOT different in politics because of how it contributes to SOCIETY and interactions between Americans.
Steve McKing, the internet certainly is a blessing in getting info to the people and exposing lies, media etc. I do think that politics and society used to be less sexually hypnotized and more civil. Good manners were common, boundaries were more respected etc.
ilovew: It would be considered a weakness these days not to attack your opponent.
Actually, a candidate who could stay on the high road and not resort to smear tactics while staying on message about a platform I believed in, would get my serious consideration. Possibly my vote.
Petronski: How do you define mud?
The Mud term may not have been fully accurate the way I used it, but I typed it rather than try to explain my dismay at what seems to be tit for tat sniping. But I guess we all need to remember...sex sells.
All: Lots of qualified people in this country wouldn't dream of entering or staying in politics because of character assassinations during elections and other times. I find it a shame that what could be our brightest and best leaders may not be willing to step forward because they don't need the aggravation in their lives. Who can blame them? And yet, we desperately need them. It's a shame really.
Thanks for the responses I'm calling it a night.
bookmark for later reading
"The Ayatollah of Rock and Rollah?"
SOMETIMES TO KILL RATS YOU MUST CLIMB INTO THE SEWER-THATS HOW YOU KILL THEM ALL
Agree completely. Where are the vaunted "investigative reporters" ala Woodward, Dana Priest et al on this? Can't wait to hear Neal Gabler on Fox News Watch this weekend./sarc
"Writers have leeway to write about human character."
So if I understand you correctly; PORN writers are just fine, it's just the people who read it that are perverted...
>I don't see this as a big deal and something so petty that it could backfire in Macacavitz's face. We'll see how this plays out.<
I bet you're male. Webb will repulse just about all female voters. Democrats need female votes to get elected.
And, it's made clear why the Democrats have been so hell bent on making voters think Allen is "racist", and that he might have uttered the "N" word 30 years ago.
They've GOT to lower Allen down to Webb's level. They've got an impossible task, and their boy is going to lose.
From Webb's book:
shirtless man walked them along a mud pathway. His muscles were young and hard, but his face was devastated with wrinkles. His eyes were so red that they appeared to be burned by fire. A naked boy ran happily toward him from the little plot of dirt. The man grabbed his young son in his arms, turned him upside down, and put the boy's penis in his mouth.
The Democrats are probably going to say... it's a novel, he was just imagining... he was just writing... so was Foley, he was just writing, too! The point is, writing about having homosexual sex with a little boy isn't normal, but a symptom of perversion.
Just how many more Democrat sickos are they running? We should do what the Rats did to us and accuse them of cover up. They knew about this pervert.
hahaha! We need a Senate investigation!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.