Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tradesports: Republicans Losing House; Senate Certainty is Down (Money where mouth is alert!)
Tradesports.com ^ | 09 October 2006

Posted on 10/09/2006 8:17:03 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

Control of the House is down to around 40%:

And the Senate is down to around 65-70%--it used to be at 80%!


(Excerpt) Read more at tradesports.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; congress; tradesports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
I believe the conservative base will show up; the buyers and sellers at tradesports.com, who put their money at risk for this kind of stuff, feel less certain about it. Ugh.
1 posted on 10/09/2006 8:17:03 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
They seem to be coming out with polls every 30 minutes or so. And all of the polls show that Republicans across the country are being punished because some Rep in Florida didn't have sex with an employee.

How odd.

2 posted on 10/09/2006 8:20:34 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Never have the grass roots been needed like this before. Im cautiously optimistic-GOP retains..


3 posted on 10/09/2006 8:21:18 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

The betting sites (like Tradesports and Iowa Electronic Market) can be pretty volatile, reacting to scandals in particular. But what we may be seeing is just a temporary Democratic bounce from the Foley scandal. It is unlikely that the bounce will persist until election day. Eventually, things will turn again in the republicans' favor (I hope).


4 posted on 10/09/2006 8:21:18 PM PDT by AaronInCarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Priam is the king of ashes, now that ten years' war is spent...


5 posted on 10/09/2006 8:22:38 PM PDT by Uncle Vlad (You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Fear not; it's always darkest before the Rove...


6 posted on 10/09/2006 8:24:12 PM PDT by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

But this is all before Rove's October surprise. I think this is going to be an eventful month before it's over.


7 posted on 10/09/2006 8:24:58 PM PDT by defenderSD (CO2 is not a pollutant and I am not a polluter when I breathe....you hear that Algore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Would be interesting to see if anyone made insider trades on the Foleygate information...


8 posted on 10/09/2006 8:26:25 PM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

It will rebound.

The Republicans won't lose either house of Congress.

As fast as its gone down, it will go back up.


9 posted on 10/09/2006 8:26:56 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

The "October Surprise" needs to be a massive mobilization of patriotic Americans who are willing to work their hearts out to keep the Speaker's gavel out of the hands of Nancy Pelosi.

To count on some manipulated "event" is foolish.


10 posted on 10/09/2006 8:27:50 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (What man doesn't know about God's creation is still enough to fill a universe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

How accurate has tradesports been in previous elections?

They seem to be regarded as more authoritative than regular polls -- Michael Barone cited tradesports in one of his recent columns -- but I wonder if they deserve to be.


11 posted on 10/09/2006 8:28:55 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

I agree. All the Democrats braying is really grating. Today's pronouncement by Reid that North Korea's testing the nuke was Bush's fault was over the top. I am hoping that the Republicans will show up in force.


12 posted on 10/09/2006 8:28:55 PM PDT by Merry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

We should also remember that the party in power usually loses at least a few congressional seats in the midterm elections.

The 2002 election was highly unusual in that regard, because Bush gained seats. The question is, can he do it again?


13 posted on 10/09/2006 8:30:04 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

"Republicans" are being punished to make the same social conservative base stay home in "outrage". The same social conservative base that supported "same sex marriage bans".

Republicans are being punished for having the wrong politics.

Foley is being punished for being a homosexual. But that wasn't enough to call for his ousting so they called him a child molester (which he was not). He left because he was outed and stepping down was the right thing to do (unlike Bill Clinton who bribed witnesses to lie under oath about his office sexcapades in a sexual harassment lawsuit).

Now Paula Jones may have been irrelevant to the case of Whitewater, but the same tactics of buying off witnesses and intimidating others (and smearing their names in print) were present in both cases. And when Bill Clinton's team went into COVER-UP, they did the same thing that Nixon did.


14 posted on 10/09/2006 8:30:41 PM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I watch these closely and this is not good news....and they are more accurate than individual polls; however, I think losing the House may not be the worst thing ever. Ford losing brought Reagan.....H.W. Bush losing brought us the House in '94. I think losing the House will bring us the White House in '08 because the Repub. can run against their loony agenda....and they will have a record to run against...unlike now.... Also, McCain and other "moderates" will get creamed if they side with these loons.....and, let's face it, the Repubs. in the House and Senate have acted like wimps.....so, I hope the House Repubs win....but it won't be a disaster if they don't....I would hate to lose the Senate though....that would not be good....
15 posted on 10/09/2006 8:31:20 PM PDT by There You Go Again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

I don't suppose you've considered that Tradesports bases their predictions on the push polls and conventional wisdom of the beltway?

Here's a bit of remembrance. When the fake exit polls came out in 2004 not just Tradesports but the REAL stock market plummeted over a 100 points. They put their money where their mouth was too, but they put it on false data.

I really don't know why Tradesports is so popular among the political crowd, when the investors base their opinions on the notoriiously wrong conventional wisdom. They don't have the inside track as to which circle the public if filling, which name is having the lever pulled...

It's junk.


16 posted on 10/09/2006 8:31:29 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

HH makes a good point on his blog-

say gbye to missile defense shield with Pelosi


17 posted on 10/09/2006 8:32:38 PM PDT by ground_fog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
How accurate has tradesports been in previous elections?

Tradesports had Bush winning in 2004, but as an example of the volatility of these betting sites, it tanked for Bush on election day because of deceptive exit polling data that came out on election day. So it is generally a good barometer, but it is easily thrown off in the short term by such things as this Foley scandal. Let it die down for a couple of weeks, and things should return to normal.
18 posted on 10/09/2006 8:34:21 PM PDT by AaronInCarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

If you look at the individual Senate races at Tradesports, then compile the results, you wind up with a prediction that the GOP will lose the Senate.


19 posted on 10/09/2006 8:34:33 PM PDT by freespirited (A government big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.- Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: There You Go Again

No, they aren't more accurate.

I just googled it because I remember 2004 and how lousy they called that one.

http://www.geekmedia.org/tradesports/

Tradesports had Bush getting 227 with Kerry getting 311.

Oh, yeah, and Bush lost Ohio.


20 posted on 10/09/2006 8:35:54 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Kobach: Amnesty is going from an illegal to a legal position, without imposing the original penalty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson