Posted on 09/07/2006 4:12:34 PM PDT by Mo1
Senate Democratic leadership threatens Disney with legal and legislative sanctions
by John in DC - 9/07/2006 06:02:00 PM
This letter was sent today by the entire Democratic leadership of the US Senate. This letter is such a major shot across the bow of Disney, it's not even funny. It is FILLED with veiled threats, both legal and legislative, against Disney. US Senators don't make threats like this, especially the entire Democratic leadership en masse, unless they mean it. Disney is in serious trouble.
Read it, then read my analysis of it below:September 7, 2006
The Senate Democratic leadership just threatened Disney's broadcast license. Not the use of the word "trustee" at the beginning of the letter and "trust" at the end. This is nothing less than an implicit threat that if Disney tries to meddle in the US elections on behalf of the Republicans, they will pay a very serious price when the Democrats get back in power, or even before.
Mr. Robert A. Iger
President and CEO
The Walt Disney Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank CA 91521
Dear Mr. Iger,
We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.
The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.
Disney and ABC claim this program to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report and are using that assertion as part of the promotional campaign for it. The 9/11 Commission is the most respected American authority on the 9/11 attacks, and association with it carries a special responsibility. Indeed, the very events themselves on 9/11, so tragic as they were, demand extreme care by any who attempt to use those events as part of an entertainment or educational program. To quote Steve McPhereson, president of ABC Entertainment, “When you take on the responsibility of telling the story behind such an important event, it is absolutely critical that you get it right.”
Unfortunately, it appears Disney and ABC got it totally wrong.
Despite claims by your network’s representatives that The Path to 9/11 is based on the report of the 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commissioners themselves, as well as other experts on the issues, disagree.
Richard Ben-Veniste, speaking for himself and fellow 9/11 Commissioners who recently viewed the program, said, “As we were watching, we were trying to think how they could have misinterpreted the 9/11 Commission’s findings the way that they had.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]
Richard Clarke, the former counter-terrorism czar, and a national security advisor to ABC has described the program as “deeply flawed” and said of the program’s depiction of a Clinton official hanging up on an intelligence agent, “It’s 180 degrees from what happened.” [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]
Reports suggest that an FBI agent who worked on 9/11 and served as a consultant to ABC on this program quit halfway through because, “he thought they were making things up.” [MSNBC, September 7, 2006]
Even Thomas Kean, who serves as a paid consultant to the miniseries, has admitted that scenes in the film are fictionalized. [“9/11 Miniseries Is Criticized as Inaccurate and Biased,” New York Times, September 6, 2006]
That Disney would seek to broadcast an admittedly and proven false recounting of the events of 9/11 raises serious questions about the motivations of its creators and those who approved the deeply flawed program. Finally, that Disney plans to air commercial-free a program that reportedly cost it $40 million to produce serves to add fuel to these concerns.
These concerns are made all the more pressing by the political leaning of and the public statements made by the writer/producer of this miniseries, Mr. Cyrus Nowrasteh, in promoting this miniseries across conservative blogs and talk shows.
Frankly, that ABC and Disney would consider airing a program that could be construed as right-wing political propaganda on such a grave and important event involving the security of our nation is a discredit both to the Disney brand and to the legacy of honesty built at ABC by honorable individuals from David Brinkley to Peter Jennings. Furthermore, that Disney would seek to use Scholastic to promote this misguided programming to American children as a substitute for factual information is a disgrace.
As 9/11 Commission member Jamie Gorelick said, “It is critically important to the safety of our nation that our citizens, and particularly our school children, understand what actually happened and why – so that we can proceed from a common understanding of what went wrong and act with unity to make our country safer.”
Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.
Sincerely,
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid
Assistant Democratic Leader Dick Durbin
Senator Debbie Stabenow
Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Byron Dorgan
This raises the stakes incredibly for Disney.
"P.S. I wish we could see the Democrats get this excited about stopping TERRORISTS as they are about a mini-series that portrays them in a bad light."
That would be something wouldn't it!....we would be way ahead in the WOT if that was the case.
Ha ha ha. I cancelled HBO, Showtime and all the others when I moved. I order what I want to see through Netflix.
I think the hornets nest has been rattled.
Exactly so and well said.
but most sheeple won't know anything about the censorship - you have to be conservative news hounds like we are here to know about this angle.
the bottom line is - if an edited program is what they run, I think it would be better if it didn't air at all.
What do you mean, you wonder why? After all the fuss over this film, the Democrats will be finished for years, if it airs as is.
At any rate, the producers could make a mint by releasing it in theaters and on home video, uncut, uncensored. The Democrats should have followed their usual MO and ignored the series, other to comment on it being fiction. Dumb move on their part.
Well that base has changed. They found out that there are Dems that don't believe abortion is good, that marriage is between man and woman, that "standing by your man" is not a good thing. Yes, it was morals that the Repubs won on. And they'll win it again on the same issues.
I have yet to meet a woman who has said they would vote for Hillary.
The truth is: She simply doesn't have the credentials and we'd all be saying: Hillary who??? if she wasn't married to Bubba.
No, but it's incredibly stupid for a politician to do this in an election year. Of course, anyone who tramples on the Constitution like this deserves to lose more than that, but whatever. I'm off to watch the NFL game now.
Repeat it again in the next 100 posts.
Are you thinking the rats may be trying to pull a fast one...has anyone actually seen this movie? On second thought, I don't think they're smart enough..
if the "liberals" are censoring then we must be the real liberals!
There's a chill wind blowing...
The Reagans was CBS, not ABC, btw, sorry for any confusion.
I never thought ABC would be swiftboating the dems. Sept is swift boat time. What will be important to focus on is our side's reaction to this. This is a great opening for our side to bring out the full evidence and clearly blast the dems with responsibility for 9/11. The piece that needs to be added to the mix is the Gorelick wall.
The decline of western civilization is directly linked to the democratic party.
That's what my husband said.
He said that Democrats are more concerned about rights for terrorists than they are concerned about free speech for our media.
Wow, the truth must really really hurt.
Hell, rooster, I am even voting for Tom Kean Jr. I will do it, I won't like it, but I will do it.
.If I never saw him again, it would be too soon!! I'm having Clinton flashbacks...someone help me!!
^^^^^^
LOL! I had the same reaction when I heard the name "Bruce Lindsay" this afternoon. He is in on this push, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.