Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Once a Progressive State, Minnesota Is Now a Fief of the N.R.A.
The New York Times ^ | September 5, 2006 | VERLYN KLINKENBORG

Posted on 09/04/2006 11:19:03 PM PDT by neverdem

Editorial Observer

A couple of weeks ago, I checked into a hotel in Bloomington, a Minneapolis suburb framed by the airport and the Mall of America. On the hotel door was a sign: “Firearms Banned on These Premises.” The next day I drove to St. Joseph, an hour west of the Twin Cities, where I saw the same sign. Slowly the logical conclusion sank in. If firearms are banned on these premises, then they must not be banned in other places.

Sure enough, a year ago the State Legislature passed a “concealed carry” law, which means that it’s legal to carry a concealed weapon if you have a permit. So that no one misses the point, the Legislature has also turned Minnesota into what is called a “shall require” state. If you apply for a concealed-weapon permit, the local authorities must grant it to you.

I asked one of the state coalitions opposed to these laws whether it would attack them in the Legislature this year. The answer was no. It is too busy trying to defeat a “shoot first” bill, which would give gun owners the right to fire away instead of trying to avoid a confrontation. The way I see it, Minnesota is only one step away from requiring every citizen to carry a gun and use it when provoked.

There are some other twists to these laws. A person carrying a concealed weapon cannot be banned from a public building, even if it’s a library full of kids. Churches have succeeded in keeping guns out of the pews, but they’re having to fight another court battle to keep them out of the parking lot. The application for a concealed-weapon permit appears to have been created by people who believe the real threat in carrying a gun is...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: banglist; dncfishwrap; elitists; firearms; gunbanners; guncontrol; liberals; minnesota; moonbats; newyorktimes; nra; nyglbtt; redstateamerica; shallissue; standyourground; verlynklinkenborg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
"Once a Progressive State," now the knuckle draggers are in control. Good Lord, those panties are in a wad.
1 posted on 09/04/2006 11:19:04 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
So that no one misses the point, the Legislature has also turned Minnesota into what is called a “shall require” state. If you apply for a concealed-weapon permit, the local authorities must grant it to you.

The term is "shall-issue." The reporter is an ignoramus.

2 posted on 09/04/2006 11:20:52 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If it was a requirement to have a gun with you at all times, then crime could be reduced (if applied only to stable noncriminals).


3 posted on 09/04/2006 11:22:37 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Once a Progressive State, Minnesota Is Now a Fief of the N.R.A.

And the halls echo with the laughter of my black conservative heart. MAWAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

4 posted on 09/04/2006 11:22:44 PM PDT by CzarNicky (Gentlemen, Dethklok has summoned a troll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
That "lady" is a raving lunatic. Shall issue CCW laws have proven effective time and time again, in state after state. There have been no exceptions.

She really needs some mental help, I mean spending all that time worrying about who might be carrying a gun?

I have news for this "lady". Criminals carry guns no matter what the law says.

5 posted on 09/04/2006 11:24:31 PM PDT by ghostmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

A person carrying a concealed weapon cannot be banned from a public building, even if it’s a library full of kids




These fools never learn. No law matters to the guy who would take a gun into a library and shoot kids. If he tried that, however, maybe it would be a good idea for the librarian to be armed so he/she could shoot the SOB before he shot kids.


6 posted on 09/04/2006 11:24:54 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Slowly the logical conclusion sank in. If firearms are banned on these premises, then they must not be banned in other places.

Proof that a common criminals is quicker to grasp reality than this reporter.

7 posted on 09/04/2006 11:25:21 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Angelides v. Schwarzenegger is like deciding between ebola and cancer, respectively.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Another liberal elitist who looks down on the blue collar riff raff and says they're too stupid to handle a gun properly. "They don't have the training of police officers." Yeah and he unloads on Minnesota's CCW law and its pending self-defense law with the mendacious claim he's a hunter and gun owner - in the same sense as John Kerry. When the New York Times starts printing screeds to the effect that Minnesota is turning a deep hue of Southern Red... you know liberals have really lost it. Its that madness sinking in.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

8 posted on 09/04/2006 11:25:25 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

An armed society is a polite society...
A dueling society is a VERY polite society..

Semper Fi


9 posted on 09/04/2006 11:25:38 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
And Yes, I realize that Verlyn Klingenborg is technically a male, hence the "'s around lady.

And no, I don't mean any insults to women by the remark, I am only pointing out the pansyness of Klingenborg.

10 posted on 09/04/2006 11:28:10 PM PDT by ghostmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: river rat
Oh dear me, it must be bleak to be a liberal in Minnesota with all those crazed gun nuts running around. Fortunately, Klinkenborg can find a gun-free paradise right in New York. And then there's California.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

11 posted on 09/04/2006 11:29:33 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem


Oh my god! People are exercising their rights! How offensive!

(/sarcasm)


12 posted on 09/04/2006 11:34:06 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky
They pine for the good ol' days when the DFL ruled Minnesota as a one party fiefdom. They ain't coming back.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

13 posted on 09/04/2006 11:34:45 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ghostmonkey
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/opinion/editorial-board.html

That "lady" is a raving lunatic.

I think it's a he.

14 posted on 09/04/2006 11:36:30 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

But did she come out alive? She forgot to tell us. Sounds lke she was in pretty bad condition going in.


15 posted on 09/04/2006 11:36:35 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

'requiring every citizen to carry a gun'
----

What an idiot to think that is a goal of anyone.


16 posted on 09/04/2006 11:37:03 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Amnesty_From_Government.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Verlynn...you may be a dumb-ass if...

"I asked one of the state coalitions opposed to these laws whether it would attack them in the Legislature this year. The answer was no. It is too busy trying to defeat a “shoot first” bill, which would give gun owners the right to fire away instead of trying to avoid a confrontation. The way I see it, Minnesota is only one step away from requiring every citizen to carry a gun and use it when provoked."

17 posted on 09/04/2006 11:37:33 PM PDT by Khurkris (When the levee breaks there'll be no place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat
Pocatello is a very polite city. Not much dueling, but lots of CCW and a social calendar at the range that would be the envy of most social organizations. International silhouette matches, cowboy action shooting, youth firearms training, local law enforcement training, long range shooters, airgun target tournaments. That's just the September lineup.

I didn't see the silhouette announcement soon enough. It would have been a hoot to take the Encore pistol with the 15" S&W 460 barrel out for some friendly competition.

18 posted on 09/04/2006 11:40:56 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; neverdem; EdReform
maybe it would be a good idea for the librarian to be armed so he/she could shoot the SOB before he shot kids.


What do you have against training and arming the kids? (grin)

They do it all the time in the MidEast... (grim)
19 posted on 09/04/2006 11:43:24 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris
"Shoot first" law - that's what the Brady gun banners perjoratively call the "Stand Your Ground" law passed in Florida and a number of other states this year that eliminate the duty of a law-abiding citizen to retreat in the face of danger before being able to use a firearm. Like any decent person would shoot in the absence of clear and present danger. In Klinkenborg's entire anti-gun jeremiad, he can't come up with ONE scintilla of proof that carrying a gun has made people less safe - or that it has turned America into the Wild West. The reason liberals are losing ground in this country is because they are out of touch with reality.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

20 posted on 09/04/2006 11:44:20 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson