Posted on 09/04/2006 11:19:03 PM PDT by neverdem
Your first picture is more accurate. Hence my "lady" comment.
Being prepared to defend one's life and other lives is not "progressive". Check.
bump
Four Million NRA members doing what Seventy four million gun owners are too lazy to do.
The notion that 38 states would have “concealed carry” laws in 2006 would have seemed insane, a regression to a more primitive idea of who we are.
More like 48. Wisconsin and Illinois are the only holdouts.
yep- but something big happened in Minnesota -1997-98
They passed a right to hunt law *- because the peta
gang was going to try and ban/restrict hunting and
fishing.
I think this helped carry the day to do the right to
carry law-
The author can go back to the lib press in minnesota
and find all kinds of doom scenarios- NONE have come
close to happening- AND the crime rate has fallen.
*( actually changed the Constitution of Minnesota so it
would be harder for the libs to repeal)
Every concealed weapon, with very few exceptions, is a blow against the public safety.
If this is so, then why has violent crime dropped disproportionately in every state where shall issue has been adopted?? Also, if this piece of balderdash is true, where are the (nonexistent) peer reviewed studies that refute John Locke's excellent book, More Guns, Less Crime.
By focusing so obsessively on an individual’s rights — in this case, the purported individual right to bear arms in the library — all other rights are shoved aside.
What other rights aren't even mentioned. It's the gun grabbers, not the NRA, that have done a really great job of destroying our other rights, like free speech with the McCain/Finegold abomination and private property rights with the USSC Kelo monstrosity. If we just talk about carrying guns in public places, like libraries, the right of everyone else to be personally secure and protected from mass terrorist shootings is greatly enhanced. Once again look at John Locke's work on mass public shootings that shows shall issue spectacularly reduces them, something this nitwit doesn't even bother to address.
He also contradicts himself later in the article where he writes: Guns make a perfect test case, because the end result is an armed cohort that is very prickly about its personal rights.
What’s worse, by granting this right to individuals, the law strips the public of its right to occupy public spaces without the threat of being shot. The police are trained to handle guns. The criminals know they’re not supposed to have them but find them easy to get, thanks to the N.R.A.
This law and the "castle doctrine" actually enhance the public's right "to occupy public spaces without the threat of being shot." The massive drop in violent crime of all types and, especially, mass public shootings that accompanies adoption of shall issue and the "castle doctrine" prove this. Again, nitwit here fails even to address the studies that conclusively show the tremendous public safety benefits of shall issue and the "castle doctrine." Also the NRA has been a leader in making sure criminals don't get guns and, even more important, in assuring stiff sentencing for people who commit violent crimes with guns. Methinks nitwit here is horrified by heavy sentencing of criminals and, especially (HORRORS!!) the death penalty.
Sometimes I think the N.R.A. isn’t really about guns at all. It’s about making certain that the public — our political and civil society, in other words — has no ability to limit the rights of an individual.
Finally we get to the nub of the liberal and Marxist objection to the NRA: the NRA is one of our greatest advocates of America and our unique rights and freedoms as Americans, something the left absolutely abominates and despises.
Guns make a perfect test case, because the end result is an armed cohort that is very prickly about its personal rights.
He's right on with this remark; that's why I'm a proud Endowing Member of the NRA, an NRA Golden Eagle, and why I'm going to contribute $200 to the NRA PVF this election season.
The foregoing quote is from your link. Not only is nitwit's column dead wrong, but with his academic background, it's blatantly dishonest and unprofessional, since he doesn't cite any peer reviewed academic studies to support his position and doesn't even mention John Locke's work.
They do it all the time in the MidEast... (grim)
They don't seem to employ much marksmanship skills, if any. Thank God!
It's pretty hard for a subhuman not to hit himslef when he's wearing a 360 degre bomb vest.
+
Why would anybody ever need to carry a gun in Minnesota?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1028540/posts
If only Dru had been armed and alert.
My apologies to John Lott and the rest of you; the early morning fuzzies got to me when I called him "John Locke."
That "lady" is a raving lunatic... She really needs some mental help...
What the helz a verlyn klinkenborg?
.....Once a Progressive State......
"Progressive" is euphamistic for "liberal verging on communist state"
Oh, wait, she is a "he"!
As a life member of the NRA I can only smile.
The announcement came as a monthly club flyer in the postal mail. I don't know if the club has a website. It is the Gate City Sport Shooting Association. Mailing address is PO Box 4862 Pocatello, ID 83205. Memberships are sold at local gun shops in Pocatello. $38/year. Open 365 days a year. Facilities not scheduled for an activity are available for use by the members. Non-member fee is $3.00 per day.
If they pass that, I might move back to Minnesota.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.