Posted on 07/13/2006 2:32:28 PM PDT by RDTF
more to follow
"I think we can definitely say that it was NOT a N. Korean missile"
<p?
Its probably safe to assume it wasnt one of Saddams scuds either.
There are no coincidences...
Bob Hope was a good man.
And funny.
Agreed. We have what would be a major advance in the story that nobody else has picked up on yet. That's highly irregular.
Iran's brutal Islamic killers must pay the highest price and very soon!
Thank God the Democrats are out of power, and real men and women who love this country are in charge in spite of what the liberals whine.
LOL. Agreed ;-)
Anyone listening to Hugh Hewitt...and hearing this...
could this be it?
http://www.iranwatch.org/privateviews/memonitor/perspex-memonitor-shihab3missile-090303.htm
IRAN'S SHIHAB-3 MISSILE
The1300 Km Shihab (Comet) 3 IRBM achieved operational status with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Air Force in July 2003 . It is believed that by now Iran possesses about 20 missiles of this type, which can reach Israel as well as US military targets in the Middle East
The missile's range and payload conforms well to Iran's nuclear ambitions.
The ancestry of the Shihab 3 is the North Korean missile program, which relied heavily on Soviet/Russian technology transfer.
So you don't believe that the Iranian Guard is on the ground in southern Lebanon assisting Hizbullah?
01:30 U.S.: Israel assured us it would act against Hezbollah, not Lebanese gov`t (Reuters)
Iran has painted a line in the sand. It won't move against Israel unless Israel attacks Syria.
Report: Israel says Haifa attack was staged by Iran
Only mention I can find so far...
Not a separate source, it's just a repeat of the Fox story.
Because the MSM protects terrorists, and needs 5 independent sources to make an accusation against evil islamo scumbags.
Contrast that with the MSM feeding frenzy when some fake "human rights" group in Iraq with 2 employees accuses our Marines of atrocities in Haditha.
Possible. However, if you couple this with the attempt to transport the two captured IDF soldiers to Iran, it sure sounds like Iran is far more directly involved. That move could not have been pulled off without consent from Teheran, which makes me all the more ready to believe that Iranian troops could be participating in the action in So. Lebanon.
We'll know for sure sooner or later.
No, hearing what?
There was a report of many Arabs trying to bumrush from Egypt to the south also...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.