Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Berg And The Twisted Values Of Greens And Pacifists (Blathering Leftist Idiots Alert)
Townhall.com ^ | 06/13/06 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 06/12/2006 10:26:39 PM PDT by goldstategop

Apparently, being the parent of a child murdered by a Muslim terrorist gives one moral credibility. There is no other way to explain the vast attention paid to the ideas of Michael Berg, father of Nick Berg, the American who was slaughtered by the Islamic sadist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. That is also the only explanation for the all the attention Cindy Sheehan has received. It is not because of the intellectual and moral depth of her worldview. But the attention paid to Michael Berg has been very helpful in enabling many more people to understand the thinking and values of the Green Party -- and those on the left sympathetic to the Greens -- and of pacifism. Thinking and values that are, in a word, twisted.

Michael Berg is a Green Party candidate for Congress from the state of Delaware and a pacifist. According to The Associated Press and many other reports, Berg believes George W. Bush is more evil than Zarqawi. Berg said that the blame for most deaths in Iraq should be placed on President Bush, who he said is "more of a terrorist than Zarqawi."

Here is one example: "Zarqawi felt my son's breath on his hand as held the knife against his throat. Zarqawi had to look in his eyes when he did it. George Bush sits there glassy-eyed in his office with pieces of paper and condemns people to death. That to me is a real terrorist."

When asked on CNN about his reaction to the death of Zarqawi, he responded: "Well, my reaction is I'm sorry whenever any human being dies. Zarqawi is a human being."

The incredulous CNN interviewer, Soledad O'Brien, then asked Berg, "At some point, one would think, is there a moment when you say, 'I'm glad he's dead, the man who killed my son'?" Berg responded: "No. How can a human being be glad that another human being is dead?"

Thanks to such views, Berg has been nominated by the Green Party to be its candidate for Congress for the lone congressional seat in Delaware.

If the fact that a man who regards his son's butcher as a better man than the American president is rewarded with a party's nomination to Congress does not tell you all you need to know about the morally twisted world of the Greens, nothing will.

It was, I believe, David Horowitz who first pointed out that with the death of communism, those who held communist views will morph from Reds to Greens -- "watermelons," he called them: green on the outside, red on the inside. Why worshippers of nature lose their moral bearings is a question for another column.

Thanks to Michael Berg, the country also better knows the warped moral universe of pacifists.

Pacifists are often personally sweet and endearing people who advocate "peace," and therefore their doctrine is usually spared the moral contempt it merits. Among its many moral and intellectual weaknesses, pacifism ensures that cruelty will prevail on earth. When asked by talk show host Michael Medved if he, Berg, would have killed Zarqawi as the terrorist was about to cut his son's throat, Berg said he would instead throw his body in front of the knife -- thereby ensuring, as Medved noted, that two innocent people would be murdered.

That is the consequence of pacifism -- far more cruelty and death. But the spread of evil apparently means little to pacifists. There must be some joy in feeling oneself so morally superior to those who believe that killing is sometimes morally necessary that even the ritual murder of one's son does not shake the pacifist's fanaticism.

The more Michael Berg speaks -- using the murder of his son, a Bush supporter and supporter of the war in Iraq, to publicize his views -- the better it is. Because every time Michael Berg speaks, he shines a needed light on the moral darkness of the Greens and of pacifism.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abumusabalzarqawi; alqaeda; berg; dennisprager; evil; greens; idiocy; iraq; islamofascism; left; michaelberg; moralrelativism; nickberg; pacifism; prager; townhall; unilateraldisamament; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Michael Berg is a pacifist. Pacifists believe in peace but in practice enable evil because they believe ALL use for force is wrong. In their world view, its better to let a thousand innocents be murdered than to kill one Abu Musab Al Zarqawi for taking their lives. They believe their moral superiority is better than other people's imperfections. In their certitude, people like Michael Berg are a threat to every human being on the planet. Because they are idiots who would allow terrorists to kill us all without our being able to stop them. That in a nutshell, is what a pacifist program would do in the real world: it is in short, a program of unilateral disarmament in the face of evil. Those on the Left who support it live in moral darkness.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

1 posted on 06/12/2006 10:26:46 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
How can a human being be glad that another human being is dead

Because he realizes that thousands of other human beings won't be butchered.

2 posted on 06/12/2006 10:31:14 PM PDT by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Ping.


3 posted on 06/12/2006 10:33:54 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't.


4 posted on 06/12/2006 10:36:45 PM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter
When i saw him on TV, i told my wife that he seemed more upset that he who shall not be named was dead than his own son
5 posted on 06/12/2006 10:41:00 PM PDT by sachem longrifle (proud member of the fond Du lac band of the Chippewa people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Michael Berg is a pacifist an idiot.

There...that's more truthful.

6 posted on 06/12/2006 10:44:46 PM PDT by JRios1968 (There's 3 kinds of people in this world...those who know math and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Berg is a mind-wiped tool of Democrat Socialist indoctrination. If you were able to get just a piece of him you'd be able to mix up a few hundred cups of Democrat-flavored fruit drink out of it. It gets really fun when they ask Rachel Corrie's parents over.

For the record - a pacifist is a person who never had to fight for their life or suffer atrocities committed on their loved ones. There's no way I could understand any "forgiveness" for the animals who killed their children no matter how convoluted.

7 posted on 06/12/2006 10:46:23 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (Israeli-style security for our Southern border - all 1,950 miles of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

It probably takes a lot of education to counter natural urges and inclinations toward survival. Berg is not an aristocrat of the spirit who throws away his life for a noble principle, but a pauper, who's life is a meaningless shell. But then is it really? When he has the cameras pointing a him it seems that he, like Cindy, would kill for the attention.


8 posted on 06/12/2006 10:55:04 PM PDT by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"Zarqawi felt my son's breath on his hand as held the knife against his throat. Zarqawi had to look in his eyes when he did it. George Bush sits there glassy-eyed in his office with pieces of paper and condemns people to death. That to me is a real terrorist." That is an amazing display of insanity....honestly, what f'n planet could someone like MB have come from? His own son's death on the internet, slow, staged, horrible all while shouting praise to some weird god...and he still gives zark the high ground!?!?!!
9 posted on 06/12/2006 10:59:26 PM PDT by gdc314
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

"How can a human being be glad that another human being is dead?"

Simple, some peaple just need killin'!


10 posted on 06/12/2006 11:01:56 PM PDT by Lancer_N3502A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

This berg is one sick man. The scary part is all the play the leftist MSM is giving him.


11 posted on 06/12/2006 11:03:41 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus
It gets really fun when they ask Rachel Corrie's parents over.

Wasn't Rachel Corrie that wench that threw herself under an army bulldozer somewhere in Gaza or the West Bank? Quite a different death than Berg's....

And what about her parents? Are they pacifists, too? If they are, I'm curious whom do they forgive for their deranged daughter's demise: the Palis, the Shalom Ahshav idiots, or the IDF?

12 posted on 06/12/2006 11:08:42 PM PDT by Neophyte (Nazis, Communists, Islamists... what the heck is the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter

Amen


13 posted on 06/12/2006 11:10:29 PM PDT by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Pacifists make my skin crawl.


14 posted on 06/12/2006 11:15:21 PM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles ("Well, Watson, we seem to have fallen upon evil days.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neophyte

I don't know if they've forgiven Caterpillar yet.


15 posted on 06/12/2006 11:19:59 PM PDT by JennysCool (Roll out the Canarble Wagon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Neophyte

Yes; she was. Their parents share the rampant California mental dysfunction known as artificial revulsion/self-imposed guilt for non-deserved actions...aka Liberalism.


16 posted on 06/12/2006 11:24:52 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (Silly aliens - Rights are for Citizens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus
As David Horowitz has observed, environmentalists are really Marxists. They may be green on the outside but like a watermelon, inside they're a deep hue of red. These people believe in confiscating everything we have for the common good. Behind their so-called concern for Mother Nature is an unbridled desire to have the government run every aspect of our lives. That's the real meaning of the Green Party agenda.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

17 posted on 06/12/2006 11:51:33 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If someone walked up to Michael Berg with a gun, club or knife and tried to kill him, would he resist or fight back to save his own life?

If he would fight to save his own life, why wouldn't he fight to save another life. If he won't fight to save his own life, that means that people are free to kill with impunity. Would he have no police?

Does he think that everyone will cheerfully obey all laws and behave perfectly nicely? What do you do with the ones that don't? How do you get them to STOP if they don't want to? Do you force them to stop killing, stealing, assaulting or do you just talk nicely and slowly to them to please stop? And if the nice words don't work?,......

Michael Berg is not connected to reality. He abets evil and violence by his refusal to do anything to stop it.

Can he distinguish between good and evil? Or is everything all the same to him? He can make no distinctions?

If some people didn't fight evil, there would be chaos, a total breakdown of society and life. You wouldn't be able to walk down the street, you'd have to fight every inch of your way.

All "liberals" and "pacifists" think words are reality. They think that talk is the solution to everything. That's why they're all "intellectuals" who produce nothing except words and more words. They never do a single lick of work that actually produces anything.
18 posted on 06/13/2006 12:00:21 AM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter

Man, that is one of the best aphorisms I have read.


19 posted on 06/13/2006 12:08:42 AM PDT by Kay Syrah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kay Syrah; MistrX
I think that it is from Benjamin Franklin. My favorite quote is from John Stewart Mill, and should be tattooed to Berg's forehead before he is deported:
"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

20 posted on 06/13/2006 12:24:14 AM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson