Posted on 06/12/2006 11:24:46 AM PDT by finnman69
"Would it kill you, 'Godless' author Ann Coulter, to do us all a favor and kill yourself? (Oh, well, yeah, I guess it would kill you.)
"After her recent rabidly hateful, foaming-at-the-mouth, sub-human 'Today' show appearance -- in which she reiterated her assertion that 9/11 widows are "enjoying their husband's deaths" -- even her former supporters began to fantasize about how much nicer the world would be if it were Coulterless."
Ann told the truth. If you don't like it go to hell.
The rules are NOT being observed. Ahemmm.
And she'll still be single. Dang!
Well of course. She's on 'our' side don't you know? Partisanship can be used to defend practically anything, even personal attacks.
I wasn't going to buy the book yet, have other things on my reading list. But after all the fuss, I had to give Ann some of my money.
Rules 1, 3, 5 and 7: NO POOFTERS!
Hehe. Now, if she'd only buy a copy of "America's Victories: Why the U.S. Wins Wars" out of solidarity!
They can stuff it.
Found it among his article archive at NY Magazine.
This guy's a real flamer.
Kudos to your lovely wife! I learned the same lesson from my first wife.
That's just so wrong.
Simon Dum-ass-o.
sw
Coulter is doing a needed service. The moonbats are having widows and grieving mothers act as spokesperson so they can have unquestionable speech. And criticism or rebuke will be countered with "how can you say that to someone who lost a loved one" in order to shut down all discourse. It's a blatant attempt by the Left to have one way dialog. Coulter is breaking the ground for further criticism by others of what these women say. Taking point isn't easy and it isn't pleasant, but it needs to be done. Anne is doing very important work by breaking through that false front.
Thanks for your perspective newbie. Coulter has hardly gotten a pass for her comments. If you do search the coulter threads here in the last week, you will find that she has been roundly criticized and defended here mainly for a couple of lines out of her 310 page book that were clearly seen as over the top by a significant number of FReepers and other conservatives. Of course, the vitriolic way she was condemned by liberals for these comments and the names she was called went a long way toward illustrated the point she was making with her acerbic language.
As for the author's comments being "tongue-in-cheek", there is nothing tongue in cheek about "do us all a favor and kill yourself" and there is nothing tongue in cheek about describing someone as "rabidly hateful, foaming-at-the-mouth, sub-human".
As a further study of interesting responses, why don't you search the comments, quotes, columns from those on the left (your basic MSM, democrat party, whatever) and see if you can find any criticism from the left for similar or more inflammatory rhetoric from the likes of Michael Moore, Al Franken, and/or Ted Rall. I would bet that you could not find enough criticisms from the left for all the vitriolic statements of all three of these left wing-nuts combined to equal even one-tenth of the criticism for just this one comment of Ann's from convervative columnists alone. You want to talk about giving someone a pass? You'll need to look elsewhere.
Not only is this author considered a jerk...I would include in that category anyone who is in this thread to shill for him (and join in the effort to stiffle Ann's skewering of those use their "grief" for cheap political purposes.)
Probably, but the MSM lackeys should certainly be added to the convertee's
Man! 82 posts before a picture of Ann shows up! The rest of you people are slipping!
I disagree. Ann is not being deliberately "outrageous". She's speaking her own unabashed mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.