Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING! (video)-CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI: Dick Morris
O'Reilly Factor | 3.03.06 | Mia T

Posted on 03/03/2006 7:07:54 PM PST by Mia T

DICK MORRIS: CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI

by Mia T, 03.03.06

 


A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA



by Mia T, 11.17.05


 

 

 

 





id you see it? More to the point, did the American press?

bill clinton made page one of Al Jazeera today. A schizophrenic mix of schadenfreude and agitprop, it was the story of an impeached ex-president of America trashing America--to standing Os--in the Arab state of Dubai--in the middle of a war zone--only several hundred miles from the American troops.

And, to rub it in, the traitor pocketed no less than $200,000 from the enemy for his troubles.

Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect.

(The Nobel committee, sufficiently mollified only after 24 years of the peanut president's America-bashing, awarded Carter his 1978 Peace Prize finally in 2002.)

Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (although not without bird problems of another sort).

Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04.

Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are?

 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE


C-SPAN asked noted presidential historians to rank the American presidents1 along the following ten dimensions: public persuasion, crisis leadership, economic management, moral authority, international relations, administrative skills, relations with congress, vision/setting an agenda, pursued equal justice for all, and performance within context of times.

bill clinton emerged as middling in most dimensions; he was surpassed in others by a settled mediocrity (Carter) and a putative failure (Nixon). In moral authority, bill clinton was rated dead last.2 He did fairly well in public persuasion, not a surprising finding given the volume of snake oil he managed to peddle during his putative presidency.

"It's NOT the economy, stupid!"

Clinton's best scores were on the economic management and pursued equal justice for all dimensions. However, both of these results are meaningful only insofar as they redound to the moral authority dimension: they are wholly based on clinton fraudulence, cooked books and black poses, respectively; and clinton's shameless Rosa Parks eulogy last week assured us that the insidious brand of clinton racism is alive and well during these tiptoe years of what the clintons hope will be their interregnum.

Note that although Brinkley doesn't place much importance on the economic management dimension--he argues that the economy variable is not durable over time--he fails to recognize that the evaluation of the clinton economy by the historians is erroneous to begin with.

Note also that C-SPAN historians found no evidence of clinton "greatness" irrespective of his moral-authority deficit, contrary to Douglas Brinkley's claim made at the clinton revisionist confab3.

(NOTE: My later research has revealed that Brinkley's qualified mention of clinton "greatness" was not a claim but rather a polite guest's white lie about an abject loser. Instead of taking the AP report at face value, one must carefully parse Brinkley's actual words and especially note the subjunctive construction.)

MIDDLING


Twenty presidents rank higher than bill clinton and 20 rank lower. But this placement assumes equal weight for each of the dimensions. And therein lies the flaw.

If 9/11 taught us anything, it is that presidential character and moral authority count, and count most.4 If the variables are properly weighted, bill clinton will always come out dead last.

That is, unless Americans are dumb enough to make the same mistake twice.

Mia T, 11.10.05
Historian massages clinton numbers, ego + legacy at revisionist confab
C-SPAN historians find no clinton "greatness" irrespective of moral-authority deficit

 

 

IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
by Mia T, 11.14.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: ahabandjezebel; bill; bribery; bush; clintoncorruption; conflictofinterest; crownprince; d; dickheaddis; dickmorris; dickwhorris; dubai; gwot; hillary; hillary2006; hillary2008; kickbacks; moneylaundering; port; portdeal; ports; terrorism; terrorists; treason; uae; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last
To: Txsleuth

Thanks, I'll be watching it too!


41 posted on 03/03/2006 7:49:55 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Elyse; Calpernia
"I think that would be more accurate if you said Christians support the separation between ONE church and state. They certainly don't support the total separation of Christian morals and values from the state."

Actually I think it would have been more accurate had I said Western vice Christian. Western culture is based on the Judeo-Christian ethic but has entered a phase of post-Christian decline. By use of the term Christian I imply a resurgence. Had I used the term Western I think the intent would have been lost. I understand what you are saying though.

42 posted on 03/03/2006 7:52:07 PM PST by Cornpone (Who Dares Wins -- Defame Islam Today -- Tell the Truth About Mohammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Yup, I was speechless when I heard this.


43 posted on 03/03/2006 7:54:18 PM PST by Chgogal (The US Military fights for Freedom of the Press while the NYT lies about the Military and cowers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

I think it's the classic approach-avoidance conflict.
On the one hand, it's the ultimate mulligan. But taking that shot would only underscore HIS utter failure... And then we must consider how he thinks SHE would handle it, knowing full well her propensity for revenge. Seems to me this is a losing proposition for him and he knows it.


44 posted on 03/03/2006 7:56:32 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

yeah, like anyone but our talk show guys, FR and various blogs will be talking about this.. MSM will completely ignore it.

i guess that could do it though... what the heck am I thinking.. who the h*ll watches or reads MSM anyway.

I'm still thinking "old school"... I must repeat 1000 times: New Media , New Media, New Media, New Media.....


45 posted on 03/03/2006 7:58:18 PM PST by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; All
It seems to run in his administration. I wrote a limerick about AlGore's similar antics here.

No cheers, unfortunately.

46 posted on 03/03/2006 7:58:59 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Don't be jumping up and down yet. The connection with a senator is a good angle but,Don't be jumping up and down yet.DC is awash with ME lobbyist money.... (yes both sides.)


47 posted on 03/03/2006 8:01:34 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

He has to guess what's behind burka's 1,2 and 3 (ala Monty Hall) to claim his prize.


48 posted on 03/03/2006 8:02:39 PM PST by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat
Yep...you may be right about Billy being scared to death of Hitlery gaining access to the white house...

He would soon become the White House capon...and she would keep her pet on a very short leash...being in control of the SS and other intel types would be easy for her...lol

Her majesty would not suffer any damage to her public image and you know what they say about a woman scorned...imagine a scorned woman with absolute power....

I think Bill & Ted put it best...Whoooooaaaaa!......

49 posted on 03/03/2006 8:03:11 PM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

excellent ;)


50 posted on 03/03/2006 8:03:52 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Chuzzlewit

Mostly Democrats watch/read MSM. Smart independents will get the news from other sources. ;)

Hopefully they are the ones who vote!


51 posted on 03/03/2006 8:04:43 PM PST by Chgogal (The US Military fights for Freedom of the Press while the NYT lies about the Military and cowers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom
Probably both. Here is is with Dubai's Sheik Maktoum checking out some prospects. - tom



This guy looks like he sat model to the cartoon of muzziehammed with detonator turban???

Keep on buying DANSK!!!
52 posted on 03/03/2006 8:07:19 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

The clintons believe they can get away with anything.
(The sad fact is that they may be right.)


53 posted on 03/03/2006 8:08:04 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Elyse

Wouldn't we be a lawless country without morals? Laws are basically made on morals.



54 posted on 03/03/2006 8:09:17 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Congressman Duncan Hunter, Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee:

http://www.marinetimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-1574343.php

“The essence of Dubai is that it is the bazaar of weapons of mass destruction components for the world’s rogue regimes.”

55 posted on 03/03/2006 8:12:21 PM PST by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"The clintons believe they can get away with anything."....
as does Carter. These two former Presidents are quite a disappointment.
56 posted on 03/03/2006 8:12:45 PM PST by Chgogal (The US Military fights for Freedom of the Press while the NYT lies about the Military and cowers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: pbrown; TomasUSMC; Do not dub me shapka broham; Stellar Dendrite

ping


57 posted on 03/03/2006 8:15:26 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


58 posted on 03/03/2006 8:16:58 PM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Wouldn't we be a lawless country without morals? Laws are basically made on morals.

You are playing with semantics. Most atheists find nothing wrong with abortion and euthanasia and they will insure you that their morals are of the highest quality.

59 posted on 03/03/2006 8:18:20 PM PST by Elyse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I'm trying to remember when Buddhism renounced the privilege of kicking around the state (when it can), ...

I'd like to know what examples you can remember to support that blanket statement. Out of curiosity.

60 posted on 03/03/2006 8:20:08 PM PST by TigersEye (Walk as if your footsteps shake the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson