Skip to comments.
Bush will veto any bill to stop port deal
AP ALERT
Posted on 02/21/2006 12:32:20 PM PST by Brian Mosely
ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (AP) President Bush says the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and he will veto any bill that would stop it.
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 1handwashestheother; blahblahblah; botsusingtheracecard; buchananbrigade; bushbotsbluedresses; bushbotscirclewagons; bushclintonbushclint; bushsellout; clownposse; coulterwillexplode; d; dontworrybehappy; downfallofbush; dubaidubaidu; dubaidubya; dusappersinatizzy; eternalevil; failedcivicsclass; gameoverman; globalists; homelandsecurity; homosexual; howlermonkeys; howlinbots; howlinmonkeys; howlinsgang; hysteriatrain; ilovekeywords; jorgealbush; kneejerk; kneepadsstat; libtard; masshysteria; moonbatsonparade; muchadoaboutnothing; newworldorder; nonstory; openborderbushbots; pantiesinabunch; ports; ratpackattack; ratpackdunces; religionofports; surrendermonkeys; texasholdem; treason; uae; vetothisbutnotcfr; waronterror; wppff; wsayswhatmeworry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 3,061-3,079 next last
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Could this be in exchange for their support when we take out Iran?
To: finnman69
"Except he is doing no such thing. Our ports remain US ports. It's a management deal. Port Security remains US Customs just like before."
Port security as EVERYONE in the whole world now knows is less than acceptable given that only 5% of cargo is scrutinized. That leaves "management" to pick up the slack.
342
posted on
02/21/2006 1:05:02 PM PST
by
markedman
(Islam means surrender, and I will NEVER surrender!)
To: W04Man
OK-What did they say?
343
posted on
02/21/2006 1:05:05 PM PST
by
Diva Betsy Ross
(Embrace peace- Hug an American soldier- the real peace keepers.)
To: YOUGOTIT
"The company that has the contract now is not American either and the company that has won this contract already has multi contracts around the world in port management. And NASA buys its rocket fuel from a French company so what is the big deal." We are not at war with the French, but we are at war with Arab muslim terrorists, whom the government of Dubai openly and proudly support. And the company that has the contract now is from GB, America's greatest and closest ally on earth.
I think if you look into this thing a little more deeply you'll be appalled too. The company that gets this job will be working hand-in-hand with the U.S. Coast Guard security operations, and hence will be aware of our national port security procedures. They will be responsible for the hiring of civilian port security personnel and dock workers. This is not good.
344
posted on
02/21/2006 1:05:21 PM PST
by
TheCrusader
("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
To: cripplecreek
Probably none. As far as I know, the UAE is not considered a state sponsor of terror. Want to make that analysis with where we're sending our oil money? I guarantee those numbers are far worse.
345
posted on
02/21/2006 1:05:22 PM PST
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: dirtboy
Click on the link I posted, and then come back and tell me what you think Congress will propose as an alternative to the acquisition by the UAE company.
Based on the cast of characters who have been complaining the loudest about this deal, I am fully confident that Congress will propose absolutely NOTHING as an alternative.
346
posted on
02/21/2006 1:05:22 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
To: Lazamataz
Since Pres. Bush forced Israel to allow Hamas to come to power, I no longer trust his judgment.
This is another case in point.
347
posted on
02/21/2006 1:05:29 PM PST
by
tomahawk
(Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
To: DC Ripper
If your understanding of this deal is equal to the profundity of your witticisms, I understand why you feel as you do.
To: Stuart Scott
"Wow, is Bush a complete moron or what?"
Whenever I hear him speak in public and attempt to complete a sentence without stumbling...I think so.
To: Swordfished
Ever heard of the city of Dubai? Look it up.
Is this the same Dubai where their Royal Family invited Michael Jackson to live in one of their palaces after he beat pedophilia and child molestation charges in the U.S.? THAT DUBAI?
To: Lazamataz
351
posted on
02/21/2006 1:05:49 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: Esther Ruth
It really shocked me when Rush went spinning on this, especially because he earlier took the other view, the view most of us are taking here. All of this causes me to sit back, wonder what's really going on, and be inclined to cut Bush some slack. It's just possible he's planning some kind of secret military operation against Iran where the UAE is an essential player. If so, he can't talk about it until it's happened. Rush's spinning could also be explained by the fact that Bush let him in on the operation in confidence.
I'm just going to sit back and see what happens for now. If my guess turns out to be wrong, I'll join the crowd attacking Bush.
To: indcons
The UAE is a federation of seven INDEPENDENT Emirates: Abu Dhabi, Ajmān, Dubai, Fujairah, Ras al-Khaimah, Sharjah and Umm al-Qaiwain.
Six out of the seven are fairly repressive. Dubai, on the other hand, is a totally different story.
Don't judge Dubai by the actions of the UAE.
353
posted on
02/21/2006 1:05:59 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked...)
To: veronica
He's gonna lose this one, and hand the Dems a jewel.
Exactly. He has overplayed his hand. GOP leaders are jumping onboard the no-sale side, and most conservative pundits too. He better do some much-needed spin control in private with the GOP leaders.
354
posted on
02/21/2006 1:06:06 PM PST
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when")
To: Brian Mosely
Dang, I guess I can forget about those macadamia nuts I just ordered from Hawaii.
355
posted on
02/21/2006 1:06:22 PM PST
by
Crawdad
(So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
To: markedman
That leaves "management" to pick up the slack. And what if some members of the new management are al Qaeda sympathizers who can tell terrorists where the security holes are?
356
posted on
02/21/2006 1:06:26 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: jdm
What's next? Hamas running airport security? If they were the only ones that wanted to do it, what else could we do? /sarc
357
posted on
02/21/2006 1:06:27 PM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: DC Ripper
If he does his very first veto to keep the UAE in control of US ports, the symbolism will be breathtaking. This has as much potential to shatter the GOP coalition as did Harriet Miers... perhaps more.
358
posted on
02/21/2006 1:06:28 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(I understand Democrats' impatience; If Kerry were President, Iran would have nuked Israel by now)
To: Lazamataz
However, the British at least are not an Islamic country that openly harbors extremist Muslims.Hahahahahahahaa
359
posted on
02/21/2006 1:06:31 PM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
To: hipaatwo
This whole episode has really shown the Dems to be opportuinsts. Either they are against racial profiling, or they are not. The dems have always been opportunist .. and hypocrites
It will be a cold day in hell before I ever go to them for help in defending our country
360
posted on
02/21/2006 1:06:41 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 3,061-3,079 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson