Posted on 01/26/2006 10:22:20 PM PST by Congressman Billybob
On 12 January, 2006, the New York Times ran an article entitled “Thrust into the Limelight, and for Some A Symbol of Washington’s Bite.” It was a mini-biography of Mrs. Martha-Ann Alito, and it purported to explain the reasons for Mrs. Alito’s tears during her husband Samuel’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. It blamed them on a follow-up question by Senator Lindsay Graham, rather than on the verbal savaging of Judge Alito by the Democrats on the Committee, led by Senator Ted Kennedy.
The Times should have gotten the story right, because one of the three reporters on the story was in their New Jersey Bureau, and based in Caldwell. But they didn’t. Here are the operative paragraphs from that article on the cause of her tears:
She has sat behind him [her husband] all week, a pleasant-looking woman in sensible clothes, peering through rimless glasses as Democrats grilled Judge Alito about his investments and his affiliation with a conservative Princeton alumni group and Republicans tried to provide him some relief.
On Wednesday, one of those Republicans, Mr. Graham, tried to mock the Democrats with a question about the alumni group, which opposed affirmative action.
"Are you really a closet bigot?" Mr. Graham asked, at which point Mrs. Alito drew her hands to her face and left the hearing room weeping.
Source: http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F20C14FD3C5B0C708DDDA80894DE404482
As the article explained, Mrs. Alito is “fiercely protective” of her husband. And she was upset by the attacks on him as if he were dishonest, or a bigot, or a poor judge. But there was an additional reason, much older and much darker than what happened at that hearing. It concerns the fact that Senator Kennedy led the attack against Judge Alito.
Mrs, Alito was born Martha-Ann Bomgardner in Ft. Knox, Kentucky. The family moved with her father’s profession as an air traffic controller to New Jersey, where she attended Rancocas Valley Regional High School in Mount Holly. After earning bachelor’s and master’s degrees at the University of Kentucky, she returned to New Jersey and became a librarian in the US Attorney’s office, where she met her husband.
Through her husband’s family, she learned of their personal friendship with another young woman who was also an only child. This other woman and her family were staunch Catholics. On occasion, they attended the same church in Roseland, New Jersey, as the Alitos, Our Lady of the Blessed Sacrament, one of only two churches in that town of 5,298. The Alitos live in Caldwell, population 7,584, where this other woman graduated from Caldwell College, probably as a commuter student from her home, rather than a resident student.
From the personal memories of this woman that Mrs. Alito got from her husband’s family, and from her own understanding of what it means to be an only child, Mrs. Alito knew of the worst thing that any human being could do to another. She also heard of its impact on the family.
That other woman’s name was Mary Jo Kopeckne. She was killed by Senator Ted Kennedy, in an auto accident on Chappaquiddick Island, Massachusetts, on 18 July, 1969. That was the other reason for Mrs. Alito’s tears.
[Author’s notes: The author did not bother any of the three families referred to here in writing this. All the information was gathered from reputable Internet sources. If the Times puts a competent reporter on the story, it can find the same information. It should also then apologize for its original article, in which the three reporters presented their personal assumptions as facts on the cause of Mrs. Alito’s upset at the hearing.]
John_Armor@aya.yale.edu
Yep. And guess what...I found it.
>>>True, but it needs to be rewritten to conform to that, and not as fact.<<<
You're grasping. It's an opinion piece. I can clearly see that as it is. It needs no re-write. You need a re-think.
What the matter with menopause .:)
It might not need a re-write, but it shouldn't be in Breaking News.
Did you see #173, which was posted by this author?
You could send all of them a correction. I think the connections you have drawn are strong enough to warrant that tiny edit.
>>>It might not need a re-write, but it shouldn't be in Breaking News.<<<
I think the post itself covers that issue. That it is still where it is indicates someone in authority has decided to leave it there - for the time being at least.
Well, I didn't get that, except in the sense that she was caught up in the irony of the situation. While we are speculating on her motives, let us not forget anger. Women have been known to shed tears of anger. ;-)
Anything that bites leeches can't be good for you.
You're really creeping me out paulat.
Are you kidding me?!?! She just posted a picture of a woman's vagina on a public internet thread and subsequently declared she will send the same picture to every press organization that wants to publish this article about Mrs Alito. What would you call the picture she posted? And what part of the word "distribution" is unclear to you.
His post from 1/19/06 creeps me out.
See #173.
Very good point. And please note the autopsy showed that Mary Jo died of asphyxiation rather than drowning (a much longer period perhaps struggling in the car.
I have no idea why Republicans use the familiar "Ted" when we are not friends with this (apparent) scoundrel. ---
That is a great question! The kindly, familiar "Ted" should NEVER be used when referring to him............ never.
you might note this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1564776/posts
I'm on the floor .... LOLOLOL!!!
I definitely see the irony. Kennedy certainly shouldn't be questioning anyone's integrity, least of all Judge (and soon to be Justice) Alito.
And now, as much as I'd like to continue this discussion all night, I shall go to bed because unfortunately, I have classes in the morning. Or...later in the morning.
paulat,I saw it but went back after you drew it to my attention.I see what you are saying.I am out of here.Night (((Hugs)))
She knew her by reputation. by word of mouth, which is a lot more personal than knowing only about her from what is said about her in print.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.