Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter says no 'blank check' for Bush on spying
Reuters ^ | 16 January 2006

Posted on 01/15/2006 4:15:00 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee promised a thorough investigation on Sunday into President George W. Bush's secret domestic eavesdropping program and said there would be no blank check for Bush.

Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican from Pennsylvania, said Bush in theory could face impeachment charges if found to have violated the law by authorizing the program, but he did not endorse that approach and had heard no serious talk of it.

News of the covert domestic spying program last month sparked an outcry by both Democrats and some members of Bush's Republican party. Many lawmakers and rights groups questioned whether it violates the U.S. Constitution.

The judiciary committee has scheduled hearings on the issue and U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has said he will testify on the administration's legal justification. The operation includes eavesdropping on U.S. phone calls and reading e-mails. The hearings are expected next month.

"We're going to explore it in depth," Specter said on ABC television's "This Week With George Stephanopoulos."

"I don't see any talk about impeachment here," Specter said. "I don't think anybody doubts that the president is making a good faith effort, that he sees a real problem as we all do, and he's acting in a way that he feels he must."

Still, the senator insisted, "we're not going to give him a blank check, and just because we're of the same party doesn't mean we're not going to look at this very closely."

(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; arlenbloodyspecter; georgewbush; homelandsecurity; nationalsecurity; patriotleak; rino; scottishlaw; security; specter; sphincter; spying; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: thelastvirgil

Pretty much the jist of it.

The Executive, at least under Bush, has been fairly accomodating to the other branches. They in turn have sought to seize every last inch of his power. It's a power grab. IMO, this is partly why the President includes in consideration for the judges he places on the bench their approach to the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. And, this is why Luttig is unlikely to ever be nominated by this President despite some conservatives holding him up as their number one choice. In two decisions that I know of he's contradicted the Executive. One I can semi agree with, another not so much.

As for Specter, he's helping put Alito on the bench. In return he exacts a pound of flesh by stabbing the administration to get face Time and take heat off from his own constituents in voting for Alito. It's dirty politics, but the bottom line is that Specter doesn't have a damn bit of ability to start impeachment hearings. He knows it as well. Unless he suddenly wants to run for the House. Even then he'd be in the minority.

So, it's all talk without ability to follow through. Liberal constituences of his that lap it up and take their focus off the courts are idiots. I welcome their diversion because I want Alito confirmed and Specter is helping that process through, but it's simply bait and switch here. He's protecting his own skin for putting Alito on Court, and Bush will allow it because he gets Alito and Specter has no power to threaten him in this manner.


21 posted on 01/15/2006 7:03:40 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Guess what, Arlen. You don't have a say in the matter. Investigate all you like, but it won't mean anything because, at the end of the day, you are powerless on this issue.


22 posted on 01/15/2006 7:28:41 PM PST by dinoparty (In the beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Sorry but if Bush should be impeached for anything, it should be for supporting that scumbag Specter!


23 posted on 01/15/2006 7:59:54 PM PST by Bommer (Ted Kenndy - Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg2000

That's just too cute!


24 posted on 01/15/2006 8:14:58 PM PST by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
I think that the President should consider whether he would be comfortable with the precedent that he is setting being used by his least favorite Democrat. Eventually the Democrats will return to the White House if our history is any guide. What then?

I would also like to add that the government has three branches: executive, legislative and judicial. Each is to be checked by the other two. The legislature currently is engaged in checking the President, as our founding fathers intended. The other check would be the judiciary's enforcement of the Fourth Amendment prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures.

The founding fathers were an unbelievably wise group of people. They knew British tyranny first hand and many were serious students of history, ancient and modern (to them). They also were uncanny observers of human nature and knew how easily events sway human opinion.

I think that we must remain ever vigilant not only of the actions and passions of others but also of our own. This is my first and will be my last post on this topic.
25 posted on 01/15/2006 10:13:03 PM PST by oceanagirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
I don't think he should spy on our end, he should spy on the other end. But I don't think that is too easy, so I'm ok with this.

I may be mistaken and we certainly don't have all the facts, but it is my understanding that they are monitoring calls made to and from numbers outside the country. Is that your understanding?

26 posted on 01/16/2006 7:50:15 AM PST by The Shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

"Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican from Pennsylvania"

This guy can be a first class a@@ sometimes. He should just kept his mouth shut and if this needs investigation, do it. All he did is add more fotter to the RATS playbook.


27 posted on 01/16/2006 8:55:24 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
Guess what, Arlen. You don't have a say in the matter. Investigate all you like, but it won't mean anything because, at the end of the day, you are powerless on this issue.

See my post here Specter wants hearings

28 posted on 01/16/2006 1:16:47 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
I don't think he should spy on our end

He's not.

29 posted on 01/16/2006 1:22:18 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Gee, just a few short months ago, Cindy Sheehan was bitching that this President wasn't listening to Americans!!!


30 posted on 01/16/2006 1:25:51 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

cBS radio rolled out Al Gore today, to speak about this, in a spot I heard while driving.

He was just about screaming about how corrupt Bush has been.

I also noted cBS didn't have time for any other viewpoint on the matter.


31 posted on 01/16/2006 1:38:54 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"we're not going to give him a blank check, and just because we're of the same party doesn't mean we're not going to look at this very closely."

NO one thinks the president should have a "blank check" on spying, including the president.

Bush was a FOOL to support Specter over Toomey. What a traitorous pain in the butt Specter is.

32 posted on 01/16/2006 5:28:27 PM PST by TAdams8591 (The first amendment does NOT protect vulgar and obscene speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Oh, so very true.


33 posted on 01/16/2006 5:29:34 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

34 posted on 01/16/2006 8:33:34 PM PST by End_Clintonism_Now (MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL CLINTON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

He no Republican - he the counterfeit - A RINO.

If you watched the Alito hearings - you could see that over 90% of the time - Specter was shaking hands, deeply in conference, or slapping some DemocRat's back.

I believe - he's also the one who called for the hearings coming up that they call "spying on Americans" (conveniently not being called "spying on the terrorists"!)

As the DemocRats look for dirt in their quest of Impeachment hearings of the President, who do you think these hearings help in their wicked plan to attack the President???

Specter is no friend of President Bush!


35 posted on 02/06/2006 2:38:54 AM PST by Anita1 (You can't argue against the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson