Posted on 11/17/2005 9:03:19 PM PST by Mia T
bill clinton made page one of Aljazeera today. The reportage was a schizophrenic mix of schadenfreude and agitprop. It was the story of an impeached ex-president of America trashing America--to standing Os--in the Arab state of Dubai--in the middle of a war zone--only several hundred miles from the American troops. And, if that weren't enough, the traitor pocketed $200,000 from the Arabs for his efforts.
Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect: Carter received his 1978 Peace Prize in 2002.
Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (although not without bird problems of another sort).
Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04.
Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are?
This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.
Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.
According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.
Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.
If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004
id you see it? More to the point, did the American press?
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t
by Mia T, 11.11.05
COMPLETE ARTICLE
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor by Mia T, 8.03.05 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) MAD hillary series #5 WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS FOR THE CHILDREN FOR AMERICA FOR THE WORLD
|
You're right, of course.
And you've cleared away my denial and my projection.
Now just how dangerous does that make Bush?
Gulp.
You may force me to upgrade my system periodically, but it is a small price to pay for your well researched and well founded insights.
Regards,
You're on fire this week, Mia. Great work!
thanx. :)
bump
bump and thank you.
What country? What conscience?
... And as for the money and adoration, note how the seditious, self-serving, poor excuse for a human being has to go abroad for both... And after yesterday, when he did what he did less than a few hundred miles from soldiers spilling their blood for him (as worthless and as despicable and as treasonous as he is), this will be increasingly true, I suspect....
Imagine the damage he would do if he and his puppet were back in the White House.... Scratch 'imagine'... Remember.
Great Post Mia
As usual
RB
;)
He's dead Jim.
You are totally correct of course. But unfortunately the old media types will never inform the unknowing and disinterested public about this presidential tradition. So again Clinton gets to spew anything he wants to destroy this administration and the country.
I've been around for about 59 years, and I have never seen the old media as biased and outrightly lying and deceptive as they have been for the past few years.
I fear for the republic.
We all know there is a growing conservative "new media" that is telling much more truth, but at the same time, the populace is being dumbed down at a greater and faster rate than ever. Therefor the old media is still as effective as ever. They have taken to passing along their biases and distortions in advertising, on tv dramas, in movies, and certainly even in children's cartoons and other programming.
The bias and the destruction is worse than ever.
****
The old established/liberal/socialist media is America's most ruthless, relentless, and destructive enemy.
***
Mia didn't you read, history was rewritten a couple of weeks ago.
Is this a real recording? He sounds either drunk or drugged or in early stages of dementia. He's almost a parody of himself now.
Exactly!
"WE" must give up power. "WE" must share. "WE" must come under a multi-national governance and "I" will lead you!
- Thanks for putting into words what I find the most disturbing about this whole deal.
I believe Clinton is consistently attempting to diminish the US as a superpower.
That is his theme nite and day. We must give up power. We must share.--Lijahsbubbe
excellent point!
Recall this:
Broad writes in part:
Broad would have us believe we are watching "Being There" and not "The Manchurian Candidate." His argument is superficially appealing as most reasonable people would conclude that it requires the simplemindedness of a Chauncy Gardener (in "Being There") to reason that instructing China and a motley assortment of terrorist nations on how to beef up their atom bombs and how not to omit the "key steps" when building hydrogen bombs would somehow blunt and not stimulate their appetites for bigger and better bombs and a higher position in the power food chain. But it is Broad's failure to fully connect the dots -- clinton's wholesale release of atomic secrets, decades of Chinese money sluicing into clinton's campaigns, clinton pushing the test ban treaty, clinton's concomitant sale of supercomputers, and clinton's noxious legacy -- that blows his argument to smithereens and reduces his piece to just another clinton apologia by The New York Times. But even a Times apologia cannot save clinton from the gallows. Clinton can be both an absolute (albeit postmodern) moron and a traitor. The strict liability Gump-ism, "Treason is as treason does" applies. The idea that an individual can be convicted of the crime of treason only if there is treasonous intent or *mens rea* runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare. Calling his position on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty "an historic milestone," (if he must say so himself) clinton believed that if he could get China to sign it, he would go down in history as the savior of mankind. This was 11 August 1995. (Similar motivation (and danger) in clinton's arm-twisting, phony rapprochement in the Mideast.) According to James Risen and Jeff Gerth of The New York Times, "the legacy codes and the warhead data that goes with them" -- apparently stolen from the Los Alamos weapons lab by scientist, Wen Ho Lee aided and abetted by bill clinton, hillary clinton, the late Ron Brown, Sandy Berger, Hazel O'Leary, Janet Reno, Eric Holder and others in the clinton administration [not to mention congressional clinton accomplices Glenn, Daschle, Bumpers, Harkin, Boxer, Feinstein, Lantos, Levin. Lautenberg, Torricelli et al.] -- "could [especially when combined with the supercomputers that clinton sold to China to help them finish the job] be particularly valuable for a country, like China, that has signed onto the nuclear test ban treaty and relies solely on computer simulations to upgrade and maintain its nuclear arsenal. The legacy codes are now used to maintain the American nuclear arsenal through computer simulation. audio Most of Lee's transfers occurred in 1994 and 1995, just before China signed the test ban treaty in 1996, according to American officials." Few who have observed clinton would argue against the proposition that this legacy-obsessed megalomaniac would trade our legacy codes for his rehabilitated legacy in a Monica minute and to hell with "the children." Mia T, 8.06.05 |
This would be far too cumbersome a process.
A better course would be to tie a rope around his leg and drag him around the mall a couple of times.
You are so right!
A+ in content and visual! You are truly in a class of your own.
Xprez is still out of control; it was never the will of the people, it was and is his will. he is a king in his own mind and the clueless bow under the spell of the witch. they are worse than any hurricane w/their distruction.
Good stuff, Mia. The American Democrats, IMHO, would love to see the most ardent radical SHIITE faction rule the world. Under the guise of the UN, no doubts.
thanx. :)
I don't believe the Ds want to cede power to the Shiites; I don't think, therefore, that they have thought this thing through to its logical conclusion.
They are truly power-obsessed idiots, this even discounting for the self-selected career variable.
Hitler thought it too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.