A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA

Aljazeera | 11.18.05 | Mia T

[Mia T]

A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA



by Mia T, 11.17.05

 

 

 

 

id you see it? More to the point, did the American press?

bill clinton made page one of Aljazeera today. The reportage was a schizophrenic mix of schadenfreude and agitprop. It was the story of an impeached ex-president of America trashing America--to standing Os--in the Arab state of Dubai--in the middle of a war zone--only several hundred miles from the American troops. And, if that weren't enough, the traitor pocketed $200,000 from the Arabs for his efforts.

Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect: Carter received his 1978 Peace Prize in 2002.

Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (although not without bird problems of another sort).

Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04.

Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are?

 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t


by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

COMPLETE ARTICLE

 

IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY

by Mia T, 11.14.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004

SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor

by Mia T, 8.03.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
MAD hillary series #5
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN
FOR AMERICA
FOR THE WORLD

They turned our bridge to the 21st century into a tunnel back into the 19th century. Back us out of that Republican tunnel, fill it in, go back across the bridge.... We'll have a giant celebration when we come back to Columbus in 2020. There's nothing more wonderful than making dreams come true.

hear hillary clinton
address to the Democratic Leadership Council
Columbus, Ohio
7.31.05

issus clinton is a dud.

I could say she has all of bill clinton's baggage and none of his charm, except I don't find bill clinton charming. What she lacks, in my view, is lubricant. Snake oil. She grates.

It's more than simple dislike. You don't want to see her; and you definitely don't want to hear her.

Missus clinton is everyman's worst nightmare: ex-wife, fishwife, frigid wife, mother-in-law; worse, the abusive Nazi commandant in the Lina Wertmuller masterpiece. When she humiliates, which is always, she dons the military-issue undershirt, she grabs the whip.

The clintons are clearly aware of this problem and are attempting to mitigate it with veneer.

Their first ploy is to pushpoll to artificially jack up missus clinton's numbers; this is a relatively easy task, given a compliant press. This illusion of electability is intended to fool the voters, activate the herd mentality and ultimately fool the smart money of the David Geffen-Harold Ickes stripe.

It won't work. Missus clinton has 100% name recognition. Any vote she doesn't already have, she won't get. Conversely, many voters have 0% information on the clinton abuses of power and utter failures. From this it follows that many votes she has today, she won't have tomorrow.

Their second ploy is to conflate "bill" and "hillary." "The clintons" become a single construct. Missus clinton arrogates bill's "bridge to the 21st century " as "theirs." And, by lifting the lyrics straight from Pinocchio, she becomes "the man from 'hope'."

The danger here for missus clinton is that with the bridge and the hope come the abuses and the utter failures.

---

AFTERWORD:

Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches? They make her sound like a cross between Pinocchio on Halcyon and a clueless tourist from Park Ridge, Illinois driving into Manhattan during rush hour. Oops.

And the plagiarizing... I mean, the clintons are shameless. And it isn't only Pinocchio.

In 2002, I wrote that the bridge to the 21st century was, arguably, clinton's most delusional conceit, that it overshot the mark by at least 1400 years.

To be fair, missus clinton's 19th-century reference is to that <yawn> retrograde 'retrograde Republicans' cliché, whereas my 7th-century reference is to the retrograde-in-fact islamofascist terrorists, whose jihadi declarations and acts of war against us the clintons willfully ignored for eight long years--allowing al Qaeda to grow exponentially in strength and reach, setting us up--very nicely, thank you--for 9/11 and its cataclysmic aftermath.

[Hoosier-Daddy]

I'm sure your postings are excellent, but your artwork is... distracting.

[Mia T]

ping

[Youngman442002]

Democrats are traitors....
Republicans are AMERICANS

[coconutt2000]

What gets me is that he still collected an engagement fee. A former President speaking on current American policy, against that policy, is a big break from tradition and a dangerous precedent.

There is a reason why former Presidents are supposed to remain out of politics, except when tapped by sitting Presidents to use their celebrity status for some cause or another. Comments regarding current policy are supposed to be noncommittal at worst, or non-forthcoming at best.

Former Presidents are supposed to fade into the woodwork. It is a very important part of our traditions that is geared toward maintaining the stability of our Republic. It is just as important as the immunity former Presidents receive from prosecution for actions taken while they were in office. These are traditions that are important to securing our Republic from the same forces that brought down past democracies and republics in our distant past.

The Clintons have too much pride in themselves, and not enough love for our country. They must be viewed with suspicion because they will put their good over the good of the nation. They have done this in the past, and they will do it again, and the immunity tradition has given them is being abused by them. If they continue to push the envelope, I wonder if Bush would be willing to set aside tradition to put the Clintons in their proper place.

[Mia T]

Thanx. It's supposed to be....

[Mia T]

excellent points.

If they continue to push the envelope, I wonder if Bush would be willing to set aside tradition to put the Clintons in their proper place.

...which is the slammer, at a minimum.

Bush, I'm afraid, doesn't seem to understand their danger.

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[nopardons]

One of your best!

[Mia T]

ping

[JSteff]

"Bush, I'm afraid, doesn't seem to understand their danger."

You are so right. Your post (and the artwork is, as usual, insightful and brilliant.

Well done.

[Brian Allen]

<< A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA >>

G-d bless you, Dear Mia but aren't you being too kind?

Why stop at only one of the evil recidivist bastards?

Or waste time with impeachment?

Sedition?! subversion?! Treason?! All in time of war and in the face of our nation's enemies.

The example set by General Washington in the matter of Major John Andre: - ordered by Military Tribunal and carried out at noon of October 2, 1781; - springs to mind as an excellent example of how the Clintons' perfidies might be put behind us.

And perhaps behind each of them?

Back-to-back at high noon!

Short drop.

[Oztrich Boy]

Does the US have an extradition treaty with Absentia?

[Lijahsbubbe]

A former President speaking on current American policy, against that policy, is a big break from tradition and a dangerous precedent.

Thanks for putting into words what I find the most disturbing about this whole deal.

I believe Clinton is consistently attempting to diminish the US as a superpower.

That is his theme nite and day. We must give up power. We must share. We must come under a multi-national governance.

[Brian Allen]

<< Bush, I'm afraid, doesn't seem to understand their danger. >>

Wish I could any longer believe that.

More and more I am of the opinion Bush's primary instinct insofar as the Clintons are concerned is to first protect the Oligarchy - 'do unto others - and second centers on his belief in the inseparability of the Office and its occupants.

And never mind the insurmountable mountain of evidence - down to their looting of the knives and forks - of their having spent eight years bemanuring the joint. And their along the way and for pennies on the Million Bucks flogging to their Peking masters a Trillion Dollars worth of our Nation's most vital nuclear and military, computer, rocketry, engineering, aeronautical and every other imaginable secrets and treasures.

Bush knows all of that.

Bush is a politician.

[Mia T]

I agree with you. There's a patrician mindset that almost works in opposition to the political one.

But, in the end, it necessarily reduces to a failure to understand the danger; if he understood the danger, how could it not trump all his other priorities?