Posted on 10/25/2005 5:48:08 AM PDT by reelfoot
A very confusing article...and no where did it tell about attacks from muslims on blacks or of a religious war...
One black girl raped by 19 men, one black youth dead, one Asian man dead"
The dead Asian man I believe is the Pakistani who as you suggest cannot be mentioned because of the higherarchy of political correctness in which Islam trumps all.
What? If you ban firearms only the criminals have guns? Hmmmmm....
Are we to understand that there are organized South Asian street gangs in in Birmingham and that these gangs have initiated violence against Caribbean gangs?
Are these South Asian street gangs predominantly Muslim or Hindu?
Was the "mixed race" individual in question Asian/African or Asian/European or European/African?
Also, like Greece, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finnland, Switzerland, Germany, China, that is, most countries who insist on preserving their own native culture, tradition, histories, language, etc.
This news story has SUCH a familiar ring to it -- Los Angeles, black and Hispanic gangs.
Everybody loses with multiculturalism, even, to some extent in multi-ethnic/racial/religious societies where the dominant culture is under CONSTANT attack, via 1. worship of other cultures/ethnicities/races/religions and 2. self-hatred, from its own members.
See America, Euro-Americans and Chrisitanity.
Just remember, diversity is our greatest strength. Anerica never accomplished much of anything in the dark days before diversity. Just look at NASA or World War II or the Constitution: when none of the astronauts or generals or politicians were diverse, America's record was one of abject failure.
In Britain the term "Asian" means an Indian or Pakistani person, not an east Asian as here.
Very confusing.
Asians= Pakistanis?
Diversity, thy name is failure.
I believe the Brits have declared the AK-47, the RPG-7, and Semtex to be religious worship articles....
Well, Islam trumps all....in Britain.
We have our own "trumps."
Lol. I saw a Phil Donahue show many years ago. It was right during/after the big broo-ha-ha between African-Americans and Hadisic Jews in New York.
Donahue had on a panel of four members from each of the above mentioned groups.
Each group had a middle-aged male leader and three younger men who did most of the talking. All were very smart, well-rehearsed and all had done their homework.
It was a pissing contest between them of whose sufferings trumped whose. Slavery versus anti-Semiticism.
Donahue sat back and watched them. Each group was absolutely positive that IT had undergone the most suffering (from guess who?) in America and the history of the planet (from guess who?) and was therefore entitled, because of its mighty courage, for the most sympathy, honor and admiration (and benefit$ from guess who?). Each group felt that it was OWED (by guess who?) because it was superior to the other group (and to guess who?) in its suffering.
Donahue wound it up by telling them, MOST humorously, that they were both the EXACT same -- elitist, racist, bigots who were flip side of the same coin.
Almost everyone laughed, including the young men from each group. The two middle-aged male leaders of said groups did NOT laugh. They KNEW that although Donahue was wrong, everyone else thought he was right....and they were NOT amused.
That was Donahue of many, many years ago. He's a pimp for the leftists now. But he did have one good show.
Same old violent stupidity. Some things never change.
Shcmuck. No, wait, that insult's too "diverse". Nincompoop.
It depends on what your definition of diversity involves.
If it is simple RACIAL or SEXUAL diversity, then it's not so. The diversity that is so good is the INTELLECTUAL diversity from each unique individual. That MAY come from different cultures, but those cultures shouldn't be racially or religously specific. That really doesn't matter.
We CAN have tremendous DIVERSITY from other European cultures. It DOESN'T have to come from a different group based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion. It MIGHT, but it doesn't guarantee any more diversity than anything else.
Diversity based on p.c. (race, ethnicity, gender. sexual orientation or religion) is crap, racist, bigoted, elitist, sexist, relative-morality crap.
I live in Birmingham UK. All I can say is - it's perfectly safe to walk the streets here. There are no "no-go" areas. But if it does end up as a post-apocalyptic society with flesh-eating zombies prowling the streets then I'll post pictures for you guys.
One interesting byproduct of multiculturalism: if you get enough "minorities" into a western society then most of the violence and race hatred will be between them. I always remember a little hindu girl who pointed to a picture of a venomous spitting cobra on my TV and said "it's a Muslim!". (I'm not saying this with any sense of superiority BTW: IMO that little girl had a point.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.