Posted on 10/03/2005 4:06:25 AM PDT by johnmecainrino
Harriet Miers
Really? Why don't you take a poll in here and see who watches "Sex in the City", "Will & Grace" & "Desparate Housewives" and then tell me who is supporting immoral principles.
And when it came down to Bush vs. Gore, she made her largest political contributions to Bush's recount efforts.
She speaks for a lot of people.
Yes, peoples politics do change over time. My wife was a registered Democrat for 30 years until she seen what Clinton did. That's when she switched to Republican.
We're both middle of the road Republicans and her meatloaf is very good.
What's that got to do with anything? Condoleezza Rice is in her 50's and she isn't married either.
That is the exact thought that came to my mind as well.
It's worth a lot to Hillary and she hasn't even had to spend a dime yet. She thanks you!
I noticed that..........
>>Wasn't Einstein basically a commie?
Einstein was basically a commie, yes. Here's a link to his famoous "Why Socialism?" Be careful not to read it while operating heavy machinery:
http://www.monthlyreview.org/598einst.htm
and here's The Einstein File, a book about Einstein's political mischief, recorded in the FBI files:
http://www.theeinsteinfile.com/
You know why all the trees in Ohio bend towards Columbus?
Because Taft sucks.
The fact that I haven't heard any concerns or outrage from the RATs gives me reason to question this nominee.
I suspect we'll know in time for the '06 elections. If she's Souter in a skirt I'll be sitting home too.
Since when do opinion polls determine moral standards?
Giuliani tops McCain in all those polls, read them again.
Seems like I keep having to say 'read it again'. But that's part of the problem, too many people ASSUMING too much too early in the process.
Initial disappointment is one thing, and understandable. Declaring that one is going to sit out or join a 3rd party is quite another.
The more I see all these "true" conservatives panic and run around screaming, threatening to never support the party again every time there is a moment of uncertainty, the less I trust them.
So given the choice in 1988 between continuing the Reagan Revolution or making Albert "Insufferable Pr*ck" Gore President she chose the latter... God, that makes me really gung ho for her nomination. It certainly shows she's a fantabulous judge of character.
Don't matter what you or we are "fine" with.
Bush's goal is to nominate the rightward most nominee who is confirmable. This may be that person. In his opinion, it is.
She donated to the DNC and ALGORE for President!
**
What was Bush thinking?
****
Drudge is now reporting she donated to Clinton/Gore campaign.
Is it true that Reid recommended her ... and Schumer calls her "mainstream"?
The only hopeful news percolating out there is a report of an evangelical Christian conversion in fairly recent years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.