Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD - Senate Debate on John G. Roberts for Chief Justice (Confirmed by a vote of 78 - 22)
CSpan ^ | Sept. 29, 2005

Posted on 09/29/2005 6:38:48 AM PDT by katieanna

Vote to occur at 11:30 Eastern Time today. Confirmation is expected.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; breaking; johnroberts; robertshearings; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 561-580 next last
To: katieanna; Lazamataz

Does Leahy sound drunk to anyone besides me. Methinks he and Teddy have had a little brunch...


441 posted on 09/29/2005 9:31:36 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Does anyone remember from the hearings what body of people that the Chief Justice apppoints? I don't think it is well known among the public. It seems like it had something to do with investigations or matters of security. I can't remember any of the details. It also seems that a person who brought it up said it surprised him, too, to learn about it.


442 posted on 09/29/2005 9:32:13 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
JUDGE EDITH HOLLAN JONES
JUDGE EDITH HOLLAN JONES U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, appointed by Reagan, born 1949 A Texan! Nearly nominated to Souter's seat by
G.H.W. Bush. You're hoping the son follows through! Jones is considered radioactive by Democrats, which you (and the administration) might consider a plus!
443 posted on 09/29/2005 9:32:13 AM PDT by cwiz24 (I worked very hard on this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

New York Times: Harriet E. Miers

"Ms. Miers, 60, was the first woman to become a partner at a major Texas law firm and the first woman to be president of the State Bar of Texas. At one point, Ms. Miers was Mr. Bush's personal lawyer."


444 posted on 09/29/2005 9:32:39 AM PDT by johnb838 (New Tone for A-Rats: I want to hear you SCREAM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: southernindymom

Had an interesting conversation with him last year on a LOW-FARE flight to Washington. I worked for him in Northern Indiana in the first campaign for Governor, but I told him that the DEM party in Indiana today, is NOT the party it was then.

In some counties, the DEM HQ's didn't even OPEN in 2004, for lack of Candidates and interest, and no one much seemed to care!

I couldn't even bring myself to VOTE for him this time around, and voted a straight ticket for the first time in my life!


445 posted on 09/29/2005 9:32:44 AM PDT by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
"Does anyone remember from the hearings what body of people that the Chief Justice apppoints?"

I don't know, but if someone answers the question can you ping me?

446 posted on 09/29/2005 9:34:25 AM PDT by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

I agree on the party situation here. My immediate family used to be Democratic, but we all switched with Reagan. The Democrats of today, regardless of what state, just about, is not the Democratic party of Kennedy. When you read what he felt, you'd think that he was a Republican. Or at least, what I have read. I was only 3 when he was killed. I think that Bayh did some decent things here in Indy, but when he went to DC, he became one of them.


447 posted on 09/29/2005 9:39:15 AM PDT by southernindymom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Maybe the Senator was talking about the Tribunals or the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court.
I just really can't remember the details. I do remember the questioner stating he was surprised. Of course, maybe I am experience temporary senility.

http://www.law.yale.edu/outside/html/Public_Affairs/621/yls_article.htm


448 posted on 09/29/2005 9:39:37 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What "milestones?"

Box'o'rocks and Feingold want War in Iraq milestones. It is as if the milestone WIN THE WAR doesn't make sense to them.

What I really didn't like about both of their tones was how they bashed how we got into the war, how we are handling the war, how we are losing the war, how we are funding the war, and how we are equipping the troops, but if they just get some milestones and a timeline, they will be fine with the war.

Gimme a break. They want a list so that they can nitpick that list everytime W doesn't meet a mark.
449 posted on 09/29/2005 9:40:22 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Prayers for Chief Justice John G. Roberts!


450 posted on 09/29/2005 9:44:00 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Families are like fudge, mostly sweet, but with a few nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: mware

As a Grampa , I love that picture!


451 posted on 09/29/2005 9:44:50 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

So Boxer says AQ wasn't in Iraq before the war?

If AQ wasn't in Iraq prior to the war, how come the War Resolution specifically states they were in Iraq. This was signed in 2002!

For some time now, Congressional Democrats have complained that the war in Iraq has drawn Al Qaeda to the region and that the jihadists were not in Iraq prior to the war.

This position is at odds with the Democrat's own words in 2002 when they demanded that an Iraqi war resolution be written and passed by Congress which specifically stated that Al Qaeda jihadists were known to be in Iraq.

Every major Democrat of note signed the War Resolution below which states the exact opposite of what they are now complaining about.

This is what the War Resolution states:

"Whereas member of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq; Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of United States citizens; the attacks on the United States of America on September 11, 2001 underscored the gravity of the threat posted by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorists organizations; we the undersigned, etc.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1138960/posts


452 posted on 09/29/2005 9:45:48 AM PDT by Peach (South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick; Enterprise

It took me a little digging, but I found something about the "special duties" of the Chief Justice here:
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=508401

"The chief justice is often said to be “first among equals” because, despite his lofty title, he only holds a single vote on the Court. However, he does hold several additional powers, both practical and ceremonial, the most important of which is the ability to choose which justice will write an opinion when the chief votes with the majority. This is particularly important because the chief justice can shape precedent by joining with the majority, when he might have voted otherwise.

"The chief justice selects judges to serve on various judicial committees, including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, often called the “wiretap court.” Beyond that, the chief justice holds a variety of other duties, including presiding at impeachment hearings, swearing in the President, and chairing the Judicial Conference of the United States, the top administrative body of the federal court system."


453 posted on 09/29/2005 9:47:26 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Howlin; Mo1

I have just returned from school with Kailey...

and I see Sen. STevens on the floor, saying that work on the defense bill is halted because of a "procedural debate"...does anyone know anything about that?

See what is happening, these bills get held up like this..then time starts running out in the fiscal year..and before Holiday breaks...so they end up with the biggest pork-laden OMNIBUS BILL....we have seen...and there is no way to got through it and figure out what is going on.


454 posted on 09/29/2005 9:49:51 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mike Pence for President of the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Good choice. My test first came up Owen, I improved my answers until I came up with Garza.


455 posted on 09/29/2005 9:50:04 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Go Mike Pence, Operation Offset, and the Cleveland Indians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

Last night there was a thread with two women suggested on it. One in the White House and another from a Circuit Court, I believe.


456 posted on 09/29/2005 9:50:22 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican

So did I! (It's apparently a very good group, LOL!)


457 posted on 09/29/2005 9:51:54 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Families are like fudge, mostly sweet, but with a few nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick; AFPhys

Thank you both.


458 posted on 09/29/2005 9:53:18 AM PDT by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

And he gets a gander at Anna Nicole Smith too!


459 posted on 09/29/2005 9:55:27 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnb838

I bet he announces on Friday afternoon....

I think, that all things considered...with all of the wrath that is being heaped on President Bush...and just about any Republican that opens their mouths, these days...

that President Bush has NOTHING to lose, by nominating the very BEST person for the job....ethnicity, sex, and ultra-conservativness, be damned....

The MEDIA and dems won't come down any harder that they are now...so Bush needs to let them know how much he "worries" about their opinion of him and his choice.


460 posted on 09/29/2005 9:55:50 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mike Pence for President of the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 561-580 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson