Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tide of Lies Swamps NY Times: Employees Riot and Steal Office Supplies
Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 1 September 2005 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)

Posted on 09/01/2005 9:23:19 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob

No, this isn’t about Maureen Dowd or Paul Krugman. That’s too easy. It’s about a story on flooding in New Orleans today (1 September). Here’s the lead:

“The 17th Street levee that gave way and led to the flooding of New Orleans was part of an intricate, aging system of barriers and pumps that was so chronically underfinanced that senior regional officials of the Army Corps of Engineers complained about it publicly for years.”

The second and third paragraphs say:

“Often leading the chorus was Alfred C. Naomi, a senior project manager for the corps... [who] grew particularly frustrated this year as the Gulf Coast braced for what forecasters said would be an intense hurricane season and a nearly simultaneous $71 million cut was announced in the New Orleans district budget to guard against such storms.”

Here’s the source: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/01/national/nationalspecial/01levee.html?hp&ex=1125547200&en=8ee34432ae4fa984&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Not until the ninth paragraph does the story imply (but fail to state) that budget cut – even if the intended work could have been done instantaneously, had nothing to do with the flooding. It quotes an expert “at the University of New Orleans, [who] said that was particularly surprising because the break was ‘along a section that was just upgraded.’ ”

The implication, gleefully trumpeted by rabid Democrats, is that George Bush caused the destruction of New Orleans. Not until paragraph 16 does the article note the system was only designed to protect against a Category 3 storm. It neglects to mention that decision was made by local officials, all Democrats.

For the truth, see a Chicago Tribune article the same day. Its lede says: “The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said Thursday that a lack of funding for hurricane-protection projects around New Orleans did not contribute to the disastrous flooding that followed Hurricane Katrina.”

The Tribune notes the decision to build the levees for a Category 3 storm was “made decades ago.” Next, it says, “ ‘I don't see that the level of funding was really a contributing factor in this case,’ said Lt. Gen. Carl Strock, chief of engineers for the corps. ‘Had this project been fully complete, it is my opinion that based on the intensity of this storm that the flooding of ... [New Orleans] would have still taken place.’ ”

Here’s the source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1475305/posts

A competent reporter would have discovered that fact. And honest reporter would have put that fact in or near the lede. The Times failed on both points.

As for possible rioting and theft by Times employees, that was a joke. I assume they steal office supplies year round.

John_Armor@aya.yale.edu


TOPICS: Free Republic; US: Louisiana; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: budgetcuts; chicagotribune; demorattabloid; flooding; georgebush; leveeconstruction; levees; lies; neworleans; nytimes; oldgrayhag; stinkinliars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
I just posted this on Newsbusters. Thought y'all would enjoy seeing it.

John / Billybob

1 posted on 09/01/2005 9:23:33 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Did they rehire Jayson Blair?


2 posted on 09/01/2005 9:25:36 PM PDT by neodad (Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

ROTFLMBO


3 posted on 09/01/2005 9:25:44 PM PDT by aworldtrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Beat you to it.

Intricate Flood Protection Long a Focus of Dispute

4 posted on 09/01/2005 9:27:35 PM PDT by Conservative Firster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

actually, it should be about Krugman in part....he jumped on the bandwagon with both feet in his mouth. Here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1475312/posts


5 posted on 09/01/2005 9:31:10 PM PDT by stylin19a (In golf, some are long, I'm "Lama Long")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Where is Hillary when you need her? </sarcasm>


6 posted on 09/01/2005 9:31:59 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

"All elected democRATS." And Hillary wants to be WHAT!


7 posted on 09/01/2005 9:32:14 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
I view attacking Paul Krugman for dishonesty the same as shooting fish in a barrel. It's so easy that it's not sporting. LOL.

John / Billybob
8 posted on 09/01/2005 9:33:37 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (My tagline is on vacation, lying in the hammock with a cold beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
As for possible rioting and theft by Times employees, that was a joke. I assume they steal office supplies year round.

LOL!

9 posted on 09/01/2005 9:33:41 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (When a Jihadist dies, an angel gets its wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

When Sacramento California, a city of 200,000 that sits at the nexus of two large rivers and is 20' below the water level gets flooded, the situation will be even worse.

The water will be rain and snow runoff because the rivers swell there in the early spring. Sub 50 degrees, it will drown and cause death by hypothermia in minutes.

Tens of thousands will drown.

The flood, caused by aging levees could have been stopped by the construction of the Auburn Dam, a project that started in the 60's, but was stopped by river rafting companies and their allies in the environmental movement and the Democrat party.

When that happens, everyone will say "We saw it coming", they will cite Army Corps of Engineer studies that showed that the only real protection for Sacramento was the Auburn Dam, which was funded and in construction when it was shut down.

Because the rivers won't stop flowing for months, the flooding will be catastrophic, continuous, and unlike New Orleans where the weather is warm right now, it will be freezing cold and hundreds of thousands will be evacuated to nowhere.

Just watch.


10 posted on 09/01/2005 9:34:36 PM PDT by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Great article, as usual, John. But...

Its lede says: "The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said Thursday that a lack of funding for hurricane-protection projects around New Orleans did not contribute to the disastrous flooding that followed Hurricane Katrina."

A competent reporter would have discovered that fact. And honest reporter would have put that fact in or near the lede.

lede ???

And ???

I professionally edit and/or proofread for a small fee :)

11 posted on 09/01/2005 9:35:09 PM PDT by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Thanks for your efforts John.

I am reposting your link.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1475305/posts


12 posted on 09/01/2005 9:36:05 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco

the decision to build the levees for a Category 3 storm was “made decades ago.”

I'm blaming FDR and Huey Long who failed to use all those CCC workers to reinforce the levees adequately


13 posted on 09/01/2005 9:36:14 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
It quotes an expert at the University of New Orleans, [who] said that was particularly surprising because the break was along a section that was just upgraded.

The implication, gleefully trumpeted by rabid Democrats, is that George Bush caused the destruction of New Orleans. Not until paragraph 16 does the article note the system was only designed to protect against a Category 3 storm. It neglects to mention that decision was made by local officials, all Democrats.

This needs to be screamed from the rooftops.

But don't hold your breath till you see this on CNN.

14 posted on 09/01/2005 9:39:04 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

LOL !...Trust me. I understood what you meant. I wasn't sure you had seen Krugman's latest effort, as it is about the flood.. (due out tomorrow - 9/2/05)


15 posted on 09/01/2005 9:42:50 PM PDT by stylin19a (In golf, some are long, I'm "Lama Long")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Just highlighting this....

"Not until the ninth paragraph does the story imply (but fail to state) that budget cut – even if the intended work could have been done instantaneously, had nothing to do with the flooding. It quotes an expert “at the University of New Orleans, [who] said that was particularly surprising because the break was ‘along a section that was just upgraded.’ ”

16 posted on 09/01/2005 9:48:37 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Our military......the world's HEROES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I just posted this on Newsbusters. Thought y'all would enjoy seeing it.

That's good information thanx. The rats still think they can win the propaganda war with the MSM. It's stuff like this that proves to Americans that the MSM is liberal and full of liars.

17 posted on 09/01/2005 9:49:32 PM PDT by Once-Ler (14 months til Byrd is ousted from office, and Kennedy ain't getin younger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

**The implication, gleefully trumpeted by rabid Democrats, is that George Bush caused the destruction of New Orleans**

I heard Mary Landrieu mouthing this a couple days ago. Sickening.


18 posted on 09/01/2005 9:52:40 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

lede-The first paragraph of a newspaper story. It should contain the most important information.


19 posted on 09/01/2005 10:03:33 PM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Come on,stop being a ninny! ;)
20 posted on 09/01/2005 10:10:04 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson