Posted on 08/28/2005 2:14:36 PM PDT by AZLiberty
...
Is "intelligent design" a legitimate school of scientific thought? Is there something to it, or have these people been taken in by one of the most ingenious hoaxes in the history of science? Wouldn't such a hoax be impossible? No. Here's how it has been done.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Since I have called you directly on several, I note that you are AGAIN bearing false witness.
An even simpler fact is that you cannot possibly know what Einstein would believe given new information or data.
It is one thing to quote the man, another thing entirely to define his potential beliefs.
He said Darwin's idea was dangerous? Why are we still teaching it in the schools? Will noöne think of the children?
Care to mention them?
Hey man did you get banned at CU?
A creationist believes that God is the intelligent designer of all life because all evidence suggests that wrist watches don't randomly occur in nature.
Evolutionists on the other hand believe that over the course of millions of years simple life sprang from non-living matter. Then, after millions of years, the simple organism gradually became more complex in design and variety until what you see today came into existence.
I know BS when I see it.
Evolutionists believe the watchmaker was blind.
Evolutionists on the other hand believe that over the course of millions of years simple life sprang from non-living matter.
Though I'm sure you've heard it before and choose to ignore it, the TOE does not say this.
You HAD to read that off of some creationist website. No thinking person would really post that.
"Hey man did you get banned at CU?"
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Is ad hominen innuendo the best you can do? Yes? Oh, then without even reading any of your other posts, I'll bet you're an evolutionist.
"Hey man did you get banned at CU?"
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Is ad hominen innuendo the best you can do? Yes? Oh, then without even reading any of your other posts, I'll bet you're an evolutionist.
"Speciation is at the boundary between microevolution and macroevolution. Microevolution is a change over the genetics in a population's allele frequencies, mainly by genetic drift and natural selection. ...Yet the cumulative change during millions of speciation episodes over vast tracts of time must account for macroevolution, the level of change that is evident over the time scale of the fossil record."
Einstein had some problems, obviously, with an anthropomorhic judgemental and personal god. Yet he spoke of G-d, too. Especially when ticked off as the "God doesn't play dice with the universe." quote shows. Then he was ticked off at quantum mechanics and uncertainty (the physics theory uncertainty).
What a person says when ticked off or emotionally distressed often opens the locked doors of what elsewise can a very close-to-the-vest, or controlled, or carefully presented personality.
Einstein clearly recognized at a deep level the inference of Divine Action upon the everyday realm of physics and the universe.
Einstein's lament shows that at heart he was not some modern Pythagorean.
Another double post. I've got to stop doing that.
I thought you believed it because the Bible said so?
Another double post. I've got to stop doing that.
And creationism is winning.
I remember the druggies saying the same thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.