More Images Of Abu Ghraib (ACLU)

READ THE ANTI-ACLU VERSION HERE. Where the BS of CBS is taken out.

1 posted on 08/23/2005 7:07:51 AM PDT by Jay777

To: RepCath; Liz; IronJack; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; Iris7; wkdaysoff; EdReform; Nick Danger; ...

2 posted on 08/23/2005 7:09:19 AM PDT by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)

Two can play the "Abu Ghraib" blame game.

Here is how it is done:

3 posted on 08/23/2005 7:10:05 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)

You can join the fight against the ACLU and their ilk by becoming involved with and supporting the following organizations:

Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) - http://www.alliancedefensefund.org

Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) - http://www.thomasmore.org

American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) - http://www.aclj.org

The Rutherford Institute - http://www.rutherford.org/

Stop the ACLU Coalition (GREATLY ORGANIZED ACTIVIST SITE..PLEASE JOIN) - http://www.stoptheaclu.org

Here are a few examples of how two of those organizations are fighting back:

ADF Contacts Over 3,600 School Districts Over Attempts To Censor Christmas

ADF: 700 lawyers ready to fight ACLU lawsuits

ADF: Pentagons' Warning About Boyscouts Is Absurd

Thomas More Law Center: Town of Palm Beach Pays $50,000 In Attorney Fees Apologizes To Women In Nativity Lawsuit

Additional information:

The ACLU must be destroyed: Joseph Farah supports Boy Scouts, urges Americans to fight back

Citizens mobilized to stop ACLU (seeks to consign group to 'ash heap of history')

ACLU fulfilling communist agenda

Revealing FACTS on the ACLU from its own writings

See how YOUR Senator or Representative ranks with the ACLU

This yahoo group just started on December 3, 2004 and is looking for new members

Anti-ACLU Page

The Center For Reclaiming America (petitions to congress)

The Becket Fund

Christian Legal Society

Pacific Justice Institute

Landmark Legal Foundation

American Family Assn. Center for Law and Policy

The Liberty Council

ACLU-Watch

ACLU (Know Thine Enemy)

My personal Anti-ACLU Blog

"I seek social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and sole control of those who produced the wealth: communism is the goal." - Roger Baldwin, ACLU founder, Harvard Reunion Book, 1935

"The establishment of an American Soviet government will involve the confiscation of large landed estates in town and country, and also, the whole body to forests, mineral deposits, lakes, rivers and so on." - William Z. Foster, ACLU co-founder and former chairman, Communist Party USA.

Let me know if you would like to join my ACLU ping list

4 posted on 08/23/2005 7:10:27 AM PDT by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)

To: E. Pluribus Unum

"Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger." "Able Danger."

5 posted on 08/23/2005 7:11:19 AM PDT by Uncle Vlad

I used to be an ACLU member, long before they decided it was more fun to help overseas terrorist prisoners then it is to help Americans who have actually had civil liberty problems. They went to the darkside about 15 years ago.

6 posted on 08/23/2005 7:18:01 AM PDT by oldleft

Ya gotta love the hypocrisy of the MSM. These are people who threw a fit when we dared to show the disheveled pictures of Saddam...or even proof that his sons were killed. Some even went as far to claim Geneva violations, even when there were just glimpses of POWs taken in Iraq.

These same humanitarians also decried the use of photos depicting or recreating the events of 9/11...for fear it would inflame emotional hatred and anger against Muslims. These are interesting concerns when you consider that this same MSM had no problem not only running 50+ days of Abu Ghraib stories (and POWs), but is now demanding access (with the ACU) to even more photos so they can intentionally inflame the emotions of Muslims towards America.

The very hatred and anger towards the USA...that the MSM blames on Bush, has been perpetuated by these same people. Whether it was the flushing Koran story or the inclimate temperatures at Gitmo, our media has been directly responsible for the attitudes and perceptions others have for...and against, this country. And they have the nerve to ask why?...They are the reason why.

7 posted on 08/23/2005 7:18:10 AM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *asses.)

The Washington Post already had all these "new" photos and videos a year and a half ago.

8 posted on 08/23/2005 7:18:43 AM PDT by saquin

9 posted on 08/23/2005 7:19:47 AM PDT by saquin

That's interesting. I hadn't heard that. Why didn't they publish. This one has me nervous, the Government needs to appeal this one.

10 posted on 08/23/2005 7:20:35 AM PDT by Patriot from Philly

I find pictures of terrorists being humiliated rather uplifting.

11 posted on 08/23/2005 7:20:42 AM PDT by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)

"The attacks will continue regardless of whether the photos and tapes are released," testified former US Army Colonel Michael Pheneger. Myers, he said, "mistakes propaganda for motivation."

CBS NEWS ONLY TELLS PART OF THE STORY!!!!!!!

Michael Pheneger was ALSO the treasurer of the ACLU in Florida...
source: "The State"

"Expert/aka Terrorist Helping Pheneger":

12 posted on 08/23/2005 7:23:19 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

To: Patriot from Philly

That's interesting. I hadn't heard that. Why didn't they publish.

They did publish some of them. Some of the ones we've seen are from this batch (like the one with a dog barking close to a prisoner in an orange jumpsuit), not from the original few leaked via 60 Minutes. Obviously, there wasn't much in this "unreleased" batch the Washington Post saw that was that much different from what was already out there.

13 posted on 08/23/2005 7:24:08 AM PDT by saquin

Hmmm. I left those picture the ACLU wanted right there, next to the burn bag.... oops. (problem solved)

14 posted on 08/23/2005 7:24:51 AM PDT by Semper Vigilantis (Why aren't the ACLU and it's members on a terrorist watch list?)

"I find pictures of terrorists being humiliated rather uplifting."

At least you enjoy them. I find I just don't give a crap. Show me a picture of troops sawing off a terrorist's head to encourage his associates to cooperate. That might be uplifting.

15 posted on 08/23/2005 7:26:58 AM PDT by hauerf

16 posted on 08/23/2005 7:30:06 AM PDT by Brilliant

Can't the President override FOA rulings by Judges on the basis of national security? Clearly our troops will be at heightened risk if these photos are released, which is exactly what the ACLU wants--more dead Americans and a weakened U.S. resolve. Bush has every right to refuse any court order to release the photos. We are a balance of powers. The SCOTUS is NOT the ultimate authority.

17 posted on 08/23/2005 7:30:21 AM PDT by montag813

Excellent points.

It's interesting how for some people the undefined notion of freedom of information trumps the concrete reality that the pictures will undermine the effort in Iraq. Of course, for them there's no tension between the two. Instead, it's a two-fer: the information gets out and the effort is undermined. Actually it's a one-fer with an incidental side effect: the effort is undermined, plus there's the freedom of information thing.

BTW, I wonder if the Geneva Convention rule against showing POWs could be used to block the release of the new pictures?

18 posted on 08/23/2005 7:30:56 AM PDT by Yardstick

CBS helpfully posted an article from that objective publication the Nation. The MSM has quietly joined the ACLU in a friend of the court action to support the release of these phots and videos even though polls showed the overwhelmingly the American people don't want to see new pictures.

The good news is that the government can appeal any decision and they better. I'm beginning to get tired of the Bush administration's inability to fight an effective PR war. Not just me, read David Frum, Red State. The conservatives are getting weary.

19 posted on 08/23/2005 7:37:18 AM PDT by Patriot from Philly

"BTW, I wonder if the Geneva Convention rule against showing POWs could be used to block the release of the new pictures?"

That's exactly what I'm wondering. Many in the MSM argued that it was "humiliating" and even culturally insensitive to air those pictures of Saddam and his sons. Yet, here they are promoting the release of some of the most "humiliating" photos the military has...of POWs.

The very reason we don't see the 9/11 attack rebroadcast is because the media fears it will inflame emotions towards Muslims...yet they have no problem inflaming the emotions of others towards America with these photos. These people are dangerous.

20 posted on 08/23/2005 7:46:04 AM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *asses.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794