Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN
Drudge Report ^ | August 3, 2005 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 08/04/2005 8:48:41 AM PDT by kennedy

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2005 11:35:09 ET XXXXX

NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN

**Exclusive**

The DRUDGE REPORT has uncovered a plot in the NEW YORK TIMES' newsroom to look into the adoption of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoptions are part of the paper's "standard background check."

Roberts’ young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father’s Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn’t stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.

Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Josie’s and Jack’s mother had them wear at the announcement ceremony.

One top Washington official with knowledge of the NEW YORK TIMES’ plans declared: “Trying to pry into the lives of the Roberts’ family like this is despicable. Children’s lives should be off limits. The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency.”

One top Republican official when told of the situation was incredulous. “This can’t possibly be true?”

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adoption; appallingdems; democratsarescum; desperatedummies; dirtdigging; disgusting; drudgelovespopups; howlowcanyougo; johnroberts; liberalmedia; liberaltolerance; newyorkgaytimes; newyorkslimes; notfittoprint; nyslimes; oleyellowjournalism; pinchsgoons; privacy; roberts; scotus; scum; scumofny; slime; supremecourt; theagonyofdefeat; whataboutgoreskid; wonttouchairamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780781-789 last
To: dubyaismypresident
Cute little blond/e kids could come from Argentina. Remember, there are cute little children of Nazis living there. AND there's the Castillian Spanish who emigrated there. Looking at them will give you a double-take if you're not expecting blonde, blue-eyed young ladies to speak Spanish fluently.

Anyone can check these facts, but I guess the NYT has no computer access to truth.
781 posted on 08/07/2005 10:22:44 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (It translates as "72 raisins of startling white clarity" NOT 72 fair skinned maidens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

This is more than sickening.


782 posted on 08/07/2005 10:26:44 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Never forget Terri Schindler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

This has plunged into farce.


783 posted on 08/07/2005 9:25:10 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
I'm just coming to this thread, and haven't sifted through all the posts; so forgive if this has already been brought up.

Some Latin American countries have blonde haired/blue eyed folks in their population. I was in Argentina, and our tour guide, 100% pure Argentinian, looked like she'd grown up in London. Blonde hair, blue eyes -- but Argentinian. I remember remarking to her about the surprise, and she told me something about how it's not as uncommon as you might think.

784 posted on 08/09/2005 12:09:11 AM PDT by Proud2BAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

has ther been blackmail? vote our way or else?


785 posted on 06/28/2012 7:13:11 PM PDT by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bookmark


786 posted on 06/28/2012 7:35:12 PM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: DocRock

For later reading.


787 posted on 06/29/2012 9:58:03 AM PDT by txnuke (Drip Drip Drip goes the eligibility questions. Vet the candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Trying to think of a reason for Roberts’ bizarre reasoning, I wondered if his family had been threatened, but I was thinking of something more physical.


788 posted on 06/30/2012 8:42:05 AM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/2001. NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
"has there been blackmail...."

Sure seems that way. Obama got on the TV and basically threatened that it be passed.

APRIL 2, 2012

789 posted on 07/01/2012 3:02:57 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780781-789 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson