Skip to comments.
Hannity radio show will have Sen. Lindsey Graham @ 1630 EST - Sen. Bill Frist scheduled for 1700 EST
Hannity Radio Show
| 5/24/05
| Libloather
Posted on 05/24/2005 1:23:58 PM PDT by Libloather
Frist's first interview since the musshy middle announced their deal. As far actual news goes - Rush called Frist's office and at this point all judges will get a vote.
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 430; 500; bill; est; filibuster; frist; graham; hannity; lindsey; radio; scheduled; sen; senator; show; simperingpansygraham; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-335 next last
To: advance_copy
Graham spinning spinning spinning
41
posted on
05/24/2005 1:43:30 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
To: Libloather
At least Hannity is giving Graham very little quarter. Graham sounds like a linguini-spined poof. He appears to believe that the agreement precludes the possibility of filibustering WRT any of the nominees in question. Maybe he really believes it, but the hard language of the "agreement" belies the truth of the matter
42
posted on
05/24/2005 1:43:31 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: Libloather
This whole filibuster fight is not about the current nominees! It's getting the senate ready for the upcoming Supreme court vacancies. Debating the qualifications of the current nominees is a waste of energy.
43
posted on
05/24/2005 1:43:36 PM PDT
by
freemama
To: bella1
sean is sort of ragging on Lindsey. Graham just doesn't get it.
Now he's going on "can I explain how it works?" What an idiot. WE know how it works.
44
posted on
05/24/2005 1:44:12 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
To: Prolifeconservative
He's taking cues from Reid now?
45
posted on
05/24/2005 1:44:39 PM PDT
by
jayef
(e)
To: Libloather
elect sanford/revenell/inglis
46
posted on
05/24/2005 1:44:52 PM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: econ_grad
I didn't hear it anywhere...It just popped into my head that Graham was a McCain supporter in 2000.
47
posted on
05/24/2005 1:45:07 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(Bush is no conservative. Don't insult my intelligence by telling me that he is)
To: wouldntbprudent
"can I explain how it works?"
That's at least twice I've heard him say that!
48
posted on
05/24/2005 1:45:30 PM PDT
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: andyk
It sounds like Graham knows he screwed up. What a putz...
At least Sean isn't giving him any slack.
49
posted on
05/24/2005 1:45:38 PM PDT
by
demkicker
(Warning the GOP Senators: Nuke the filibuster!)
To: Guillermo
I hope rush is wrong when he said that Bush will nominate Gonzales to the SCOTUS. If he does that, it's the last straw as far as I'm concerned.
To: Guillermo
If I'm not mistaken, I believe Graham was McCain's "chair" in South Carolina in 2000. I could be wrong, but seems like I remember that.
51
posted on
05/24/2005 1:45:58 PM PDT
by
IMissPresidentReagan
("My Friends we did it....we made a difference. ...All in all not bad, not bad at all." Pres. Reagan)
To: wouldntbprudent
Sean, you are doing an awesome job today.
Got the interview, being firm and fair.
52
posted on
05/24/2005 1:46:12 PM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: freemama
"This whole filibuster fight is not about the current nominees! It's getting the senate ready for the upcoming Supreme court vacancies. Debating the qualifications of the current nominees is a waste of energy."
BINGO!!!
I saw Howie Dean on Judy Woodruff just a few minutes ago and he as much said the same thing.
53
posted on
05/24/2005 1:46:38 PM PDT
by
Prolifeconservative
(If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
To: IMissPresidentReagan
I think you are right because I remember him standing up against X42 during impeachment, but then he flip flopped in 2000 and went to the dark side with McCain.
54
posted on
05/24/2005 1:47:07 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
To: hansel
It seems like Graham is getting the best of Sean.
Now Graham is talking about polls. That Republicans want to keep the right to filibuster---but if it's wrong, why should we do it?
55
posted on
05/24/2005 1:47:07 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
To: Libloather
Sen. Lindsey Graham: Still one of the seven morons! "Dopey" played by Graham! He's an idiot! Get him Sean! If you can.
56
posted on
05/24/2005 1:47:08 PM PDT
by
Road Warrior ‘04
(Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
To: hansel
"Ha! He knows he's screwed the pooch...."
I wonder if McAssclown aka McBenedict-Arnold knows what he's done.
To: wouldntbprudent
Let me explain to you, Senator Graham, how it works. At every opportunity, when I see your name on a ballot, I pull the lever for the other candidate. Got it?
58
posted on
05/24/2005 1:47:12 PM PDT
by
jayef
(e)
To: petercooper
Hannity: "Why would seven Republicans undermine the President?"
59
posted on
05/24/2005 1:47:29 PM PDT
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: Libloather
Just where do the Republicans stand?
1.LEAD????????,
2.FOLLOW?????????
OR
3.GET OUT OF THE WAY????????
Time will tell. So far,I pick 3
60
posted on
05/24/2005 1:47:44 PM PDT
by
jos65
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-335 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson