Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hannity radio show will have Sen. Lindsey Graham @ 1630 EST - Sen. Bill Frist scheduled for 1700 EST
Hannity Radio Show | 5/24/05 | Libloather

Posted on 05/24/2005 1:23:58 PM PDT by Libloather

Frist's first interview since the musshy middle announced their deal. As far actual news goes - Rush called Frist's office and at this point all judges will get a vote.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 430; 500; bill; est; filibuster; frist; graham; hannity; lindsey; radio; scheduled; sen; senator; show; simperingpansygraham; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-335 next last
To: advance_copy

Graham spinning spinning spinning


41 posted on 05/24/2005 1:43:30 PM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

At least Hannity is giving Graham very little quarter. Graham sounds like a linguini-spined poof. He appears to believe that the agreement precludes the possibility of filibustering WRT any of the nominees in question. Maybe he really believes it, but the hard language of the "agreement" belies the truth of the matter


42 posted on 05/24/2005 1:43:31 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This whole filibuster fight is not about the current nominees! It's getting the senate ready for the upcoming Supreme court vacancies. Debating the qualifications of the current nominees is a waste of energy.


43 posted on 05/24/2005 1:43:36 PM PDT by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bella1

sean is sort of ragging on Lindsey. Graham just doesn't get it.

Now he's going on "can I explain how it works?" What an idiot. WE know how it works.


44 posted on 05/24/2005 1:44:12 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Prolifeconservative

He's taking cues from Reid now?


45 posted on 05/24/2005 1:44:39 PM PDT by jayef (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

elect sanford/revenell/inglis


46 posted on 05/24/2005 1:44:52 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad

I didn't hear it anywhere...It just popped into my head that Graham was a McCain supporter in 2000.


47 posted on 05/24/2005 1:45:07 PM PDT by Guillermo (Bush is no conservative. Don't insult my intelligence by telling me that he is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent
"can I explain how it works?"

That's at least twice I've heard him say that!
48 posted on 05/24/2005 1:45:30 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: andyk

It sounds like Graham knows he screwed up. What a putz...

At least Sean isn't giving him any slack.


49 posted on 05/24/2005 1:45:38 PM PDT by demkicker (Warning the GOP Senators: Nuke the filibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo

I hope rush is wrong when he said that Bush will nominate Gonzales to the SCOTUS. If he does that, it's the last straw as far as I'm concerned.


50 posted on 05/24/2005 1:45:56 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Allen/DeLay '08!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo

If I'm not mistaken, I believe Graham was McCain's "chair" in South Carolina in 2000. I could be wrong, but seems like I remember that.


51 posted on 05/24/2005 1:45:58 PM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan ("My Friends we did it....we made a difference. ...All in all not bad, not bad at all." Pres. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

Sean, you are doing an awesome job today.




Got the interview, being firm and fair.


52 posted on 05/24/2005 1:46:12 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: freemama

"This whole filibuster fight is not about the current nominees! It's getting the senate ready for the upcoming Supreme court vacancies. Debating the qualifications of the current nominees is a waste of energy."

BINGO!!!

I saw Howie Dean on Judy Woodruff just a few minutes ago and he as much said the same thing.


53 posted on 05/24/2005 1:46:38 PM PDT by Prolifeconservative (If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan
I think you are right because I remember him standing up against X42 during impeachment, but then he flip flopped in 2000 and went to the dark side with McCain.
54 posted on 05/24/2005 1:47:07 PM PDT by b4its2late (It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: hansel

It seems like Graham is getting the best of Sean.

Now Graham is talking about polls. That Republicans want to keep the right to filibuster---but if it's wrong, why should we do it?


55 posted on 05/24/2005 1:47:07 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Sen. Lindsey Graham: Still one of the seven morons! "Dopey" played by Graham! He's an idiot! Get him Sean! If you can.


56 posted on 05/24/2005 1:47:08 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hansel

"Ha! He knows he's screwed the pooch...."

I wonder if McAssclown aka McBenedict-Arnold knows what he's done.


57 posted on 05/24/2005 1:47:10 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Allen/DeLay '08!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

Let me explain to you, Senator Graham, how it works. At every opportunity, when I see your name on a ballot, I pull the lever for the other candidate. Got it?


58 posted on 05/24/2005 1:47:12 PM PDT by jayef (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: petercooper

Hannity: "Why would seven Republicans undermine the President?"


59 posted on 05/24/2005 1:47:29 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Just where do the Republicans stand?

1.LEAD????????,
2.FOLLOW?????????
OR
3.GET OUT OF THE WAY????????

Time will tell. So far,I pick 3


60 posted on 05/24/2005 1:47:44 PM PDT by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-335 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson